On February 9, 2006, the Drug Safety and Risk Management AdvisoryCommittee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voted bya narrow margin eight to seven to recommenda "black-box" warning describing the cardiovascular risks ofstimulant drugs used to treat attention deficithyperactivitydisorder (ADHD). This action was unexpected, largely becausethe FDA had not requested a review of current labeling for thisclass of drugs; it had merely asked for recommendations of approachesto studying the cardiovascular risks associated with these drugs.The committee, however, decided to take an independent course.As a consultant to this committee, I introduced two motions,one recommending the black-box warning and the other proposingthe development of a guide for patients, which was approvedby a vote of 15 to 0. The guides are handouts that are requiredto be provided at the time prescriptions are dispensed; theycontain information, written in nontechnical language, aboutthe potential hazards of the medication.
The drugs under review were primarily amphetamines (Adderalland other brands) and methylphenidate (Ritalin, Concerta, andother brands). These agents are closely related members of theclass of sympathomimetic amines, the structures of several ofwhich are shown in the diagram. These compounds exert potentstimulant effects on the cardiovascular and central nervoussystems. One of the oldest such agents, methamphetamine, wasoriginally synthesized in 1891 and first widely used duringWorld War II in Nazi Germany to enhance the ability of Luftwaffepilots to stay alert during extended hours of combat. Medicaluse of this agent is now limited, but illicit use has grownrapidly and now represents an increasing public health problem.When smoked or injected intravenously, methamphetamine ("speed")is associated with hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis, myocardialinfarction, stroke, and sudden death effects well knownto coroners in regions of the United States where abuse is common.Beginning in the 1950s, the stereoisomer dextroamphetamine andrelated agents were introduced as appetite suppressants.
ADHD is a disorder commonly diagnosed in school-age boys (lesscommonly in girls) and is characterized by increased activity,an inability to concentrate, and poor school performance. Theeffectiveness of stimulants in treating ADHD has been well documentedin randomized clinical trials. Amphetamines and amphetamine-likestimulants were introduced to treat ADHD in the 1950s, but thefrequency of this diagnosis and the use of stimulants to treatit have accelerated enormously in recent years. The FDA advisorycommittee heard testimony indicating that 2.5 million childrennow take stimulants for ADHD, including nearly 10 percent ofall 10-year-old boys in the United States.1 The committee alsolearned that the use of these agents is much less prevalentin European countries, where the diagnosis of ADHD is relativelyuncommon. Even more strikingly, 1.5 million adults now takesuch stimulants on a daily basis, with 10 percent of users olderthan 50 years of age. The diagnosis of "adult" ADHD is a relativelyrecent phenomenon and has resulted in the most rapid growthin the use of such agents.1
The concern of the advisory committee reflected several considerations.The cardiovascular effects of the sympathomimetic amines havebeen thoroughly described in the medical literature. These agentssubstantially increase the heart rate and blood pressure. Ina placebo-controlled trial, mixed amphetamine salts (Adderall)administered to adults increased systolic blood pressure byabout 5 mm Hg; similar effects were found with methylphenidateformulations.2 Blood-pressure changes of this magnitude, particularlyduring long-term therapy, are known to increase morbidity andmortality. In 2005, a separate FDA advisory committee that Ichaired concluded that blood-pressure changes represented sucha reliable predictor of cardiovascular outcomes that class labelingwould be appropriate in most cases.3 The increases in heartrate induced by sympathomimetic agents also have well-describedadverse cardiovascular effects. The administration of thesedrugs produces persistent increases in heart rate, inducingchronic heart failure in animal models of dilated cardiomyopathy.
A review of the regulatory history of this class of drugs alsohelps to explain why the advisory committee took decisive action.The dietary supplement ephedra, sometimes called ma huang, containstwo alkaloids, ephedrine (see diagram) and its enantiomer, pseudoephedrine.These supplements have been used by millions of Americans toassist in weight loss or to increase energy. Some athletes haveadvocated the use of ephedra-containing dietary supplementsas performance-enhancing agents. On December 31, 2003, federalofficials announced plans to ban ephedra immediately. Healthand Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson told reporters,"The time to stop using these products is now." This actionfollowed several high-profile catastrophic outcomes linked toephedra products, including the death of 23-year-old BaltimoreOrioles pitcher Steve Bechler. Published studies reported thatsales of ephedra-containing supplements represented less than1 percent of all dietary-supplement sales but that these productsaccounted for 64 percent of the serious adverse reactions tosupplements reported to the Centers for Disease Control andPrevention.4 Unfortunately, in April 2005, a federal court inUtah struck down the federal ban on ephedra. Many companiesthat make these products are located in Utah.
Similar regulatory actions have been proposed for phenylpropanolamine(PPA), another closely related sympathomimetic amine (see diagram).On December 22, 2005, the FDA issued a notice of "proposed rulemakingfor over-the-counter nasal decongestant and weight control products"containing PPA. The notice called for a public comment perioduntil March 22, 2006, after which the FDA would undertake regulatoryaction that would probably include banning the use of the agentin over-the-counter preparations. The FDA's action followedmany years of concern about the potential of PPA products tocause hemorrhagic stroke. Six years ago, a casecontrolstudy published in the Journal reported a 16-fold increase inthe risk of stroke among women taking PPA for appetite suppression.5
Briefing documents prepared for the February 9 advisory-committeemeeting described cases of myocardial infarction, stroke, andsudden death in children and adults taking ADHD stimulants.1These narratives were derived from the FDA's Adverse Event ReportingSystem (AERS), a database containing reports of adverse eventssubmitted by health care providers. The AERS is a voluntaryreporting system that has been criticized because only 1 to10 percent of serious adverse events are actually reported,limiting the database's usefulness for identifying emergingdrug hazards. The drug-related events reviewed by the committeeincluded 25 cases of sudden death in children or adults (seetable), some with evidence on autopsy of undiagnosed congenitalheart disease, such as hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.The physiology of this condition renders patients particularlyvulnerable to the adverse effects of sympathomimetic drugs,because such agents increase contractility, thereby increasingthe pressure gradient in the left ventricular outflow tract.Many additional cases of major adverse cardiovascular events,including myocardial infarction, stroke, and serious arrhythmias,were reviewed by the committee. However, the documentation ofcases was frequently incomplete, and neither the FDA reviewersnor the committee considered the AERS data to be definitive.
Cases of Sudden Death Reported to the FDA Advisory Committee from the AERS Database.
Despite the difficulty of interpreting these data, the advisorycommittee acted preemptively to recommend strong regulatoryaction. The majority of the group accepted my argument thatthe propensity of sympathomimetic agents to raise blood pressureand heart rate, the history of serious adverse effects associatedwith two members of the class (ephedra and PPA), and the rapidincrease in exposure, particularly among adults, warranted strongand immediate action. Although the committee recognized thatthere are important potential benefits of these drugs for certainhighly dysfunctional children, we rejected the notion that theadministration of potent sympathomimetic agents to millionsof Americans is appropriate. We sought to emphasize more selectiveand restricted use, while increasing awareness of potentialhazards. We argued that the FDA should act soon, and decisively.
Source Information
Dr. Nissen is the interim chairman of the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, and was a consultant to the FDA's Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee for the hearings on ADHD drugs.
This article was published at www.nejm.org on March 20, 2006.
An interview with Dr. Nissen can be heard at www.nejm.org.
Wilens TE, Hammerness PG, Biederman J, et al. Blood pressure changes associated with medication treatment of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66:253-259. [ISI][Medline]
Nissen SE, Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee. Report from the Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee: US Food and Drug Administration: June 15-16, 2005: Gaithersburg, Md. Circulation 2005;112:2043-2046. [Medline]
Kingston RL, Borron SW. The relative safety of ephedra compared with other herbal products. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:385-385. [Medline]
Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Brass LM, et al. Phenylpropanolamine and the risk of hemorrhagic stroke. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1826-1832. [Free Full Text]
Vetter, V. L., Elia, J., Erickson, C., Berger, S., Blum, N., Uzark, K., Webb, C. L.
(2008). Cardiovascular Monitoring of Children and Adolescents With Heart Disease Receiving Stimulant Drugs: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation
117: 2407-2423
[Full Text]
Lower, E. E., Harman, S., Baughman, R. P.
(2008). Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Dexmethylphenidate Hydrochloride for the Treatment of Sarcoidosis-Associated Fatigue. Chest
133: 1189-1195
[Abstract][Full Text]
Harpin, V A
(2008). Medication options when treating children and adolescents with ADHD: interpreting the NICE guidance 2006. EDUCATION AND PRACTICE
93: 58-65
[Abstract][Full Text]
Winterstein, A. G, Gerhard, T., Shuster, J., Zito, J., Johnson, M., Liu, H., Saidi, A.
(2008). Utilization of Pharmacologic Treatment in Youths with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Medicaid Database. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
42: 24-31
[Abstract][Full Text]
Segal, M. M., Rogers, G. F., Needleman, H. L., Chapman, C. A.
(2007). Hypokalemic Sensory Overstimulation. J Child Neurol
22: 1408-1410
[Abstract]
Winterstein, A. G., Gerhard, T., Shuster, J., Johnson, M., Zito, J. M., Saidi, A.
(2007). Cardiac Safety of Central Nervous System Stimulants in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Pediatrics
120: e1494-e1501
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rosner, A.
(2007). Adverse Events in the Manipulation of Pediatric Patients: Flaws in a Systematic Review. Pediatrics
119: 1261-1264
[Full Text]
(2007). Update on drugs for hyperactivity in childhood. DTB
45: 37-40
[Abstract][Full Text]
Nutt, J. G., Carter, J. H., Carlson, N. E.
(2007). Effects of Methylphenidate on Response to Oral Levodopa: A Double-blind Clinical Trial. Arch Neurol
64: 319-323
[Abstract][Full Text]
Furman, L.
(2007). Stimulants and Sudden Death: What Is the Real Risk?. Pediatrics
119: 409-409
[Full Text]
Vohra, S., Johnston, B. C., Cramer, K., Humphreys, K.
(2007). Adverse Events Associated With Pediatric Spinal Manipulation: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics
119: e275-e283
[Abstract][Full Text]
Califf, R. M
(2006). Clinical trials bureaucracy: unintended consequences of well-intentioned policy. Clin Trials
3: 496-502
[Abstract]
Wilens, T. E., Prince, J. B., Spencer, T. J., Biederman, J.
(2006). Stimulants and Sudden Death: What Is a Physician to Do?. Pediatrics
118: 1215-1219
[Abstract][Full Text]
(2006). Reviews of Note. JWatch Psychiatry
2006: 2-2
[Full Text]
Anders, T., Sharfstein, S., Rappley, M. D., Moore, J. W., Dokken, D., Wojnowski, L., Nissen, S. E.
(2006). ADHD drugs and cardiovascular risk.. NEJM
354: 2296-2298
[Full Text]