Intracoronary Bone MarrowDerived Progenitor Cells in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Volker Schächinger, M.D., Sandra Erbs, M.D., Albrecht Elsässer, M.D., Werner Haberbosch, M.D., Rainer Hambrecht, M.D., Hans Hölschermann, M.D., Jiangtao Yu, M.D., Roberto Corti, M.D., Detlef G. Mathey, M.D., Christian W. Hamm, M.D., Tim Süselbeck, M.D., Birgit Assmus, M.D., Torsten Tonn, M.D., Stefanie Dimmeler, Ph.D., Andreas M. Zeiher, M.D., for the REPAIR-AMI Investigators
Background Pilot trials suggest that the intracoronary administrationof autologous progenitor cells may improve left ventricularfunction after acute myocardial infarction.
Methods In a multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 204 patientswith acute myocardial infarction to receive an intracoronaryinfusion of progenitor cells derived from bone marrow (BMC)or placebo medium into the infarct artery 3 to 7 days aftersuccessful reperfusion therapy.
Results At 4 months, the absolute improvement in the globalleft ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantlygreater in the BMC group than in the placebo group (mean [±SD]increase, 5.5±7.3% vs. 3.0±6.5%; P=0.01). Patientswith a baseline LVEF at or below the median value of 48.9% derivedthe most benefit (absolute improvement in LVEF, 5.0%; 95% confidenceinterval, 2.0 to 8.1). At 1 year, intracoronary infusion ofBMC was associated with a reduction in the prespecified combinedclinical end point of death, recurrence of myocardial infarction,and any revascularization procedure (P=0.01).
Conclusions Intracoronary administration of BMC is associatedwith improved recovery of left ventricular contractile functionin patients with acute myocardial infarction. Large-scale studiesare warranted to examine the potential effects of progenitor-celladministration on morbidity and mortality. (ClinicalTrials.govnumber, NCT00279175
[ClinicalTrials.gov]
.)
Prompt reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery hasconsiderably improved the clinical outcome in patients withacute myocardial infarction.1 Although contemporary reperfusionstrategies using stent implantation and aggressive inhibitionof platelet aggregation have been shown to increase myocardialsalvage,2 improvements in global left ventricular function arerather modest, despite the use of optimal reperfusion therapy.3,4Heart failure that develops after infarction remains a majorcause of morbidity and mortality.5,6
Experimental studies suggested that intravascular or intramyocardialadministration of progenitor cells derived from bone marrow(BMC) or blood may contribute to functional regeneration ofinfarcted myocardium and enhance neovascularization of ischemicmyocardium.7,8,9,10 Moreover, clinical pilot studies demonstratedthat intracoronary infusion of progenitor cells is feasibleand may improve the recovery of left ventricular contractilityin patients with acute myocardial infarction.11,12,13,14,15,16We therefore designed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomizedmulticenter trial the Reinfusion of Enriched ProgenitorCells and Infarct Remodeling in Acute Myocardial Infarction(REPAIR-AMI) trial to determine whether intracoronaryinfusion of enriched BMC is associated with improved globalleft ventricular function in patients with myocardial infarctiontreated with state-of-the-art methods.
Methods
Study Population and Protocol
We enrolled the first patient in the study on April 16, 2004,and the last 4-month angiographic follow-up was performed onOctober 31, 2005. The definition of primary and secondary endpoints, as well as the prespecified subgroup analyses, havebeen published previously.17 In brief, patients 18 to 80 yearsof age were eligible for the study if they had had an acuteST-elevation myocardial infarction that had been successfullyreperfused by means of stent implantation and had a substantialresidual left ventricular regional wall-motion abnormality (asdefined by an ejection fraction 45% according to a visual estimate).Written informed consent was obtained within 3 days after thereperfusion therapy if the patients no longer required intravenouspressor substances or mechanical hemodynamic support. The ethicsreview board at each participating center approved the protocol,and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declarationof Helsinki. A total of 16 centers in Germany and 1 in Switzerlandparticipated in this investigator-initiated trial.
All patients underwent bone marrow aspiration 3 to 6 days afterreceiving reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction.The bone marrow aspirate was sent by courier to the centralcell-processing laboratory (Institute for Transfusion Medicine,Frankfurt, Germany), where patients were randomly assigned toreceive placebo medium or BMC, and the study medication wassent back to the centers. Temperature-registering isolationboxes were used for the shipment of bone marrow aspirates andthe study medication to monitor the quality of the materialsduring transportation. Baseline left ventricular angiographywas performed at the time of intracoronary infusion of studymedication and was repeated in identical projections at 4 monthsof follow-up (Figure 1). All patients undergoing bone marrowaspiration underwent randomization, and clinical follow-up startedat the time of bone marrow aspiration.
LVEF denotes left ventricular ejection fraction, CRP C-reactive protein, and LV left ventricular.
Cell Preparation and Administration
A total of 50 ml of bone marrow was aspirated into heparin-treatedsyringes from the iliac crest with the use of local anesthesia.The bone marrow aspirate was shipped at room temperature togetherwith 20 ml of venous blood used to produce patients' own serumto the central cell-processing laboratory. Progenitor cellswere isolated and enriched with the use of FicollHypaquecentrifugation procedures.14 The cell suspension consisted ofa heterogeneous cell population including hematopoietic, mesenchymal,and other progenitor cells, as well as mononuclear cells. Thecells were suspended in 10 ml of X VIVO 10 medium (a serum-freemedium containing pharmaceutical-grade human components, Cambrex),including 2 ml of the patient's own serum. The placebo mediumconsisted of the 10 ml of X VIVO 10 medium, including 2 ml ofthe patient's own serum (without BMC). Frequencies of BMC wereassessed according to the guideline of the International Societyof Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering.18
After undergoing arterial puncture, all patients received 7500to 10,000 U of heparin, and the first 85 patients received abolus of abciximab (0.25 mg per kilogram of body weight). Cellswere infused with the use of a stop-flow technique through anover-the-wire balloon catheter (Opensail, Guidant) positionedwithin the segment containing the stent, as described previously.12
Left Ventricular Angiography
Left ventricular angiograms were obtained in identical standardprojections at the time of the baseline procedure (immediatelybefore intracoronary cell infusion) and at 4 months. An experiencedinvestigator in a central core laboratory who was unaware ofthe patient's treatment assignment quantitatively analyzed theleft ventricular angiograms from individual patients with theuse of CMS software (version 6.0, Medis), as previously described.12Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricularvolumes were calculated with the use of the arealengthmethod, and regional wall motion in the infarcted zone was determinedwith the use of the center-line chord method.12
End Points
The primary end point was the absolute change in global LVEFfrom baseline to 4 months, as measured by quantitative leftventricular angiography.17 Secondary end points included changesin left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume andchanges in regional wall motion. Prespecified subgroup analyseswere conducted to determine whether there was an interactionof the primary end point with baseline LVEF and the time tointracoronary-infusion therapy. Prespecified clinical end pointsincluded major adverse events (defined as death, recurrenceof myocardial infarction, or any revascularization procedure)and rehospitalization for heart failure. Other clinical eventsor combined end points were assessed as a post hoc analysis.Only the first event for each patient was included in the analysis.As of June 16, 2006, 1-year clinical follow-up data were availablefor 168 patients.
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables are presented as means ±SD (unlessstated otherwise). Analysis-of-variance testing was used tocompare the incidence of the primary end point the changein LVEF between the groups. For subgroup analyses, subgroupvariables were entered as effects into the univariate analysis-of-variancemodel to determine whether there was an interaction with thetreatment assignment. An analysis-of-variance model was usedto adjust for effects, and an analysis-of-covariance model wasused to adjust for covariates. To estimate the treatment effect,differences in least-square means and corresponding 95% confidenceintervals (CIs) were calculated on the basis of the analysis-of-variancemodel. All other analyses were performed in a nonparametricpaired fashion with the use of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test,if not stated otherwise. Nonparametric MannWhitney Uand KruskalWallis tests were used to compare continuouswith categorical variables. Categorical variables were comparedwith the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to correlate continuousdata. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicatestatistical significance. All reported P values are two-sided.Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software (version13.0, SPSS).
Results
Enrollment and Baseline Characteristics
A total of 217 patients with an acute myocardial infarctionsuccessfully reperfused by means of stent implantation gavewritten informed consent to participate in the trial. Of thesepatients, 13 were excluded before undergoing bone marrow aspiration(Figure 1). Of the remaining 204 patients undergoing bone marrowaspiration, 103 were randomly assigned to receive an infusionof placebo medium and 101 to receive a BMC infusion into theinfarct-related coronary artery. The two groups were well matchedwith respect to baseline characteristics and procedural characteristicsof the reperfusion therapy and concomitant pharmacologic therapyduring the study (Table 1). The characteristics of the BMC areprovided in the Supplementary Appendix (available with the fulltext of this article at www.nejm.org).
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Patients and Concomitant Therapy.
Procedural Results of Intracoronary Infusion
After bone marrow aspiration, one patient withdrew consent andone patient was excluded owing to fever and an increase in thelevel of C-reactive protein. No patient had bleeding complicationsor hematoma formation at the bone marrow puncture site. Intracoronaryinfusion was successful in all patients in the BMC group. Inthe placebo group, intracoronary infusion was not performedin three patients: in one the guidewire could not be advancedinto the infarct-related artery, one had an air embolism duringinitial angiography before the guidewire could be advanced,and one had angiographic evidence of a thrombus in a noninfarct-relatedartery.
Quantitative Variables of Left Ventricular Function
Baseline measurements of left ventricular function and volumesdid not differ significantly between the two groups (Table 1).At 4 months, paired left ventricular angiograms with adequatecontrast opacification for quantitative analysis were availablefor 95 patients in the BMC group and 92 patients in the placebogroup. Paired left ventricular angiograms were not availablefor the two patients in each group who died, five patients (threein the placebo group and two in the BMC group) who declinedto undergo angiography at follow-up, three patients who missedone angiographic session (two patients in the placebo groupand one patient in the BMC group), and one patient with leftventricular thrombus in the placebo group. In addition, in onepatient in each group, poor contrast opacification precludedquantitative analysis of the left ventricular angiogram (Figure 1).
Global LVEF increased from a mean of 46.9±10.4% at baselineto 49.9±13.0% at 4 months in the placebo group. In theBMC group, global LVEF increased from 48.3±9.2% to 53.8±10.2%(Table 2). At 4 months, LVEF was significantly higher in theBMC group than in the placebo group (P=0.02). The absolute increasein LVEF was significantly greater in the BMC group than in theplacebo group (2.5%; 95% CI, 0.5 to 4.5; P=0.01).
Table 2. Quantitative Measures of Left Ventricular Function.
In order to document that the primary end point of the studywas not affected by the subtle, nonsignificant differences inboth baseline variables and clinical end points during follow-upbetween the two groups, we reanalyzed the data after adjustmentfor a variety of effects or covariates (Figure 2). None of theadjustments altered the primary finding that intracoronary administrationof BMC was associated with a significantly greater increasein global LVEF than was placebo.
Figure 2. Effect of BMC Therapy as Compared with Placebo on the Primary End Point of the Absolute Change in the Global LVEF from Baseline to 4 Months.
The primary end point is shown before and after adjustment for effects according to analysis of variance (ANOVA) or analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The large diamonds show the absolute change in LVEF, and the small diamonds show the 95% CI.
Selective analysis of the infarcted zone revealed a significantlygreater improvement in regional contractility in the BMC groupthan in the placebo group (Table 2). End-diastolic volumes slightlyincreased in both groups (Table 2). In contrast, left ventricularend-systolic volumes remained constant in the BMC group butincreased in the placebo group. The absolute change in leftventricular end-systolic volumes differed significantly betweenthe two groups (Table 2).
Interaction between Change in LVEF and Both Baseline LVEF and Time to Infusion
There was a significant inverse relation between baseline LVEFand the absolute change in LVEF at 4 months in the BMC group(r=0.21, P=0.04) but not in the placebo group (r=+0.11,P=0.31). When the total patient population was dichotomizedaccording to the median value of LVEF at baseline, there wasa significant interaction between the treatment effect of theBMC infusion and the baseline LVEF (P=0.02). Among patientswith a baseline LVEF at or below the median value (48.9%), patientsin the BMC group had an absolute increase in LVEF that was threetimes that in the placebo group (Figure 3A): 7.5±7.1%as compared with 2.5±7.7% (absolute difference, 5.0%;95% CI, 2.0 to 8.1). Among patients with a baseline LVEF abovethe median, the absolute difference between groups was 0.3%(95% CI, 2.2 to 2.8), with an absolute improvement inLVEF in the placebo group of 3.7±4.6%, as compared with4.0±7.1% in the BMC group.
Figure 3. Interaction between Baseline LVEF and the Absolute Change in LVEF (Panel A) and between the Timing of Intracoronary Infusion of BMC or Placebo after Reperfusion Therapy and the Absolute Change in LVEF (Panel B).
In Panel A, the P value for interaction was determined by analysis of variance. In both panels, the upper and lower edges of each box plot indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, the "whiskers" the 10th and 90th percentiles, the solid horizontal line the median, and the dotted line the mean. All outliers are shown as individual data points. In Panel B, the P value for interaction was calculated with the use of a general linear model. The solid line in Panel B shows the regression curve for the BMC group, and the dotted line shows the regression curve for the placebo group
Correlating the absolute changes in LVEF at 4 months with thetime from reperfusion therapy to intracoronary infusion of BMCor placebo medium revealed a significant interaction, with aprogressive increase in BMC-associated recovery of contractilefunction as the interval between reperfusion therapy and BMCinfusion increased (P=0.01) (Figure 3B). In fact, the beneficialeffects of BMC infusion on the recovery of contractile functionwere confined to patients who were treated more than 4 daysafter infarct reperfusion. BMC infusion on day 5 or later wasassociated with an absolute increase in LVEF of 5.1% (95% CI,1.7 to 8.5; absolute improvement in LVEF, 1.9±7.6% inthe placebo group vs. 7.0±7.7% in the BMC group; P=0.004),whereas no benefit was observed in patients treated up to day4 after reperfusion (treatment-associated increase in LVEF,0.6%; 95% CI, 1.8 to 3.0; absolute improvement in LVEF,3.9±5.4% in the placebo group vs. 4.5±6.8% inthe BMC group; P=0.62). The interaction between the BMC treatmenteffect and the timing of the procedure (4 days vs. 5 days) wassignificant (P=0.03) and remained significant when baselineLVEF was also entered into the model as a covariate (P=0.04).
Clinical Outcomes
Table 3 summarizes the adverse clinical events during hospitalizationfor acute myocardial infarction, at 4 months, and at 1 year(data were available for 168 patients as of June 16, 2006).The occurrence of the individual major adverse cardiac eventsof death, recurrence of myocardial infarction, and rehospitalizationfor heart failure did not differ significantly between the twogroups during follow-up. However, the incidence of the prespecifiedcombined clinical end point of death, recurrence of myocardialinfarction, and coronary revascularization was significantlylower in the BMC group than in the placebo group (Table 3).Likewise, the post hoc combined clinical end point of death,recurrence of myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization forheart failure occurred less frequently in the BMC group thanin the placebo group.
The principal finding of our study is that intracoronary administrationof BMC is associated with a significant increase in the recoveryof left ventricular contractile function in patients with optimallytreated acute myocardial infarction. Because the results ofearly pilot studies were promising,11,12,13,14,15,16 we designeda placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial in whichpatients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly assignedto receive an infusion of either BMC or placebo medium in theinfarct-related artery within 3 to 7 days after successful reperfusiontherapy and the implantation of a stent. After 4 months, theglobal LVEF was significantly higher in the BMC group than inthe placebo group. The enhanced recovery of global left ventricularcontractile function after the intracoronary administrationof BMC was due to a significant reduction in the extent andmagnitude of regional left ventricular dysfunction within theterritory of the infarct. Thus, segments with the most severeimpairment in contractility at baseline appear to derive thegreatest benefit from BMC administration. Moreover, intracoronaryadministration of BMC abrogated left ventricular end-systolicvolume expansion after the infarction. Taken together, our findingsindicate that when combined with optimal reperfusion therapy(stent implantation) and state-of-the-art medical treatment,intracoronary administration of BMC enhances the recovery ofglobal and regional left ventricular function after myocardialinfarction.
The results of our predefined subgroup analysis generate someimportant hypotheses essential for designing trials that addressthe clinical relevance of BMC administration. The magnitudeof left ventricular contractile recovery was inversely relatedto the baseline LVEF, confirming similar observations in theTransplantation of Progenitor Cells and Regeneration Enhancementin Acute Myocardial Infarction (TOPCARE-AMI) pilot trial.14Patients with the most severely depressed left ventricular contractilefunction had the greatest improvement in contractile functionafter the intracoronary administration of BMC. A reduced LVEFduring the acute phase of myocardial infarction is the mostimportant independent predictor of a poor outcome, even in theera of optimal reperfusion therapy with the use of stentingof the infarct-related artery.19 Thus, enhanced recovery ofcontractile function may be beneficial specifically in patientswith large infarcts and depressed left ventricular function.
The mechanisms involved in mediating the recovery of contractilefunction after the intracoronary infusion of BMC are not wellunderstood.20 The microenvironment within the infarct tissueand the timing of cell delivery may be important determinantsof the incorporation and effect of BMC.20 We found that an intracoronaryinfusion of BMC within 4 days after reperfusion therapy foracute myocardial infarction had only marginal effects on therecovery of left ventricular contractile function. This findingis in agreement with the preliminary results of a small, randomized,placebo-controlled trial in which intracoronary infusion ofbone marrowderived mononuclear progenitor cells within24 hours after reperfusion therapy failed to improve left ventricularfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction.21
Our study was not powered to assess whether intracoronary infusionof BMC can reduce the risk of complications and death amongpatients with acute myocardial infarction. However, the incidenceof individual adverse clinical end points tended to be lowerin the BMC group than in the placebo group. Thus, the intracoronaryadministration of BMC appears to be safe and feasible.
A major limitation of our study was the exclusive use of leftventricular angiography for the serial assessment of left ventricularfunction. Although angiography is well suited to delineate regionalcontractile function, the use of magnetic resonance imagingto assess global left ventricular function would have more preciselydepicted changes in the distorted geometry of the infarctedhearts.
In summary, after acute myocardial infarction, the intracoronaryadministration of BMC enhances left ventricular contractilerecovery. Given the safety profile of this treatment and thebeneficial effects in patients with the most severely impairedleft ventricular function, large-scale studies are warrantedto examine the potential effects of this novel approach on therisk of death and complications in patients with large acutemyocardial infarctions and depressed left ventricular contractilefunction.
Supported by an unrestricted research grant from Guidant. Guidantprovided balloon catheters, and Eli Lilly provided the abciximab.
Dr. Schächinger reports having received consulting feesfrom Guidant and AstraZeneca and lecture fees from Pfizer, Novartis,Merck Sharp & Dohme, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi-Aventis,and Boston Scientific. Dr. Dimmeler reports having receivedconsulting fees from Guidant and Genzyme and lecture fees fromMedtronic. Dr. Zeiher reports having received consulting feesfrom Guidant. Dr. Haberbosch reports having received lecturefees from Takeda, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Essex, and Pfizer.Drs. Dimmeler and Zeiher report that they are cofounders oft2cure, a for-profit company focused on regenerative therapiesfor cardiovascular disease. They serve as scientific advisersand are shareholders. No other potential conflict of interestrelevant to this article was reported.
We are indebted to Hans Martin (Department of Hematology) forexpert advice, to Tina Rasper and Nicola Krzossok for technicalassistance in cell processing, to Wilhelm Sauermann for statisticaladvice, to Tayfun Aybek for database assistance, to FlorianSeeger and Jörg Honold for logistic support, and to thefollowing nonprofit research organizations, which supportedthe research leading to the initiation of the study: AlfriedKrupp Stiftung, German Research Foundation, and European VascularGenomics Network.
* Members of the Reinfusion of Enriched Progenitor Cells and InfarctRemodeling in Acute Myocardial Infarction (REPAIR-AMI) studygroup are listed in the Appendix.
Source Information
From the Department of Internal Medicine III, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt (V.S., B.A., S.D., A.M.Z.); the Department of Cardiology, Herzzentrum Leipzig, Leipzig (S.E., R.H.); the Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Klinik, Bad Nauheim (A.E., C.W.H.); the Department of Internal Medicine, Zentralklinikum Suhl, Suhl (W.H.); the Department of Cardiology, Universitätsklinikum Giessen, Giessen (H.H.); the Department of Cardiology, Zentralklinikum, Bad Berka (J.Y.); the Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center, Hamburg (D.G.M.); the Department of Cardiology, Universitätsklinikum, Mannheim (T.S.); and the Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Red Cross Blood Donor Service BadenWürttembergHessen, Frankfurt (T.T.) all in Germany; and the Department of Cardiology, Universitätsspital, Zurich, Switzerland (R.C.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Zeiher at the Department of Internal Medicine III, J.W. Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany, or at zeiher{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de.
References
Lange RA, Hillis LD. Reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:954-955. [Free Full Text]
Schomig A, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, et al. Coronary stenting plus platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:385-391. [Free Full Text]
Montalescot G, Barragan P, Wittenberg O, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1895-1903. [Free Full Text]
Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, et al. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:957-966. [Free Full Text]
Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1309-1321. [Erratum, N Engl J Med 2003;348:2271.] [Free Full Text]
Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJV, Velazquez EJ, et al. Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1893-1906. [Free Full Text]
Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, et al. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature 2001;410:701-705. [CrossRef][Medline]
Kawamoto A, Gwon HC, Iwaguro H, et al. Therapeutic potential of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for myocardial ischemia. Circulation 2001;103:634-637. [Free Full Text]
Kocher AA, Schuster MD, Szabolcs MJ, et al. Neovascularization of ischemic myocardium by human bone-marrow-derived angioblasts prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis, reduces remodeling and improves cardiac function. Nat Med 2001;7:430-436. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mangi AA, Noiseux N, Kong D, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells modified with Akt prevent remodeling and restore performance of infarcted hearts. Nat Med 2003;9:1195-1201. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Strauer BE, Brehm M, Zeus T, et al. Repair of infarcted myocardium by autologous intracoronary mononuclear bone marrow cell transplantation in humans. Circulation 2002;106:1913-1918. [Free Full Text]
Assmus B, Schächinger V, Teupe C, et al. Transplantation of Progenitor Cells and Regeneration Enhancement in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TOPCARE-AMI). Circulation 2002;106:3009-3017. [Free Full Text]
Britten MB, Abolmaali N, Assmus B, et al. Infarct remodeling after intracoronary progenitor cell treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction TOPCARE-AMI): mechanistic insights from serial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2003;108:2212-2218. [Free Full Text]
Schächinger V, Assmus B, Britten MB, et al. Transplantation of progenitor cells and regeneration enhancement in acute myocardial infarction: final one-year results of the TOPCARE-AMI Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1690-1699. [Free Full Text]
Wollert KC, Meyer GP, Lotz J, et al. Intracoronary autologous bone-marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: the BOOST randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2004;364:141-148. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Fernandez-Aviles F, San Roman JA, Garcia-Frade J, et al. Experimental and clinical regenerative capability of human bone marrow cells after myocardial infarction. Circ Res 2004;95:742-748. [Free Full Text]
Schächinger V, Tonn T, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM. Bone-marrow-derived progenitor cell therapy in need of proof of concept: design of the REPAIR-AMI trial. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2006;3:Suppl 1:S23-S28.
Sutherland DR, Anderson L, Keeney M, Nayar R, Chin-Yee I. The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry. J Hematother 1996;5:213-226. [Medline]
Halkin A, Singh M, Nikolsky E, et al. Prediction of mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: the CADILLAC risk score. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1397-1405. [Free Full Text]
Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM, Schneider MD. Unchain my heart: the scientific foundations of cardiac repair. J Clin Invest 2005;115:572-583. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Janssens S, Dubois C, Bogaert J, et al. Autologous bone marrow-derived stem-cell transfer in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;367:113-121. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Appendix
The following investigators and committee members participatedin the REPAIR-AMI study (numbers in parentheses are the numbersof patients enrolled): Germany Herzzentrum, Leipzig(35) S. Erbs, R. Hambrecht; J.W. Goethe Universität,Frankfurt (28) V. Schächinger, A. Zeiher; KerckhoffKlinik, Bad Nauheim (22) A. Elsässer, M. Stanisch,C. Hamm; Zentralklinikum, Suhl (18) W. Haberbosch; Universitätsklinikum,Giessen (15) H. Hölschermann, H. Tillmanns; Zentralklinikum,Bad Berka (14) J. Yu, B. Lauer; Hamburg University CardiovascularCenter, Hamburg (13) D. Mathey, T. Tübler; Universitätsklinikum,Mannheim (11) T. Süselbeck, M. Brückmann,K. Haase; Universitätsklinikum, Homburg/Saar (9) G. Nickenig, N. Werner, M. Böhm; Kardiologisches CentrumRotes Kreuz, Frankfurt (8) J. Haase; Klinikum, Kassel(5) C. Hansen, J. Neuzner; Bergmannshaeil Klinik, UniversitätBochum, Bochum (4) A. Germing, A. Mügge; HerzzentrumLudwigshafen (4) B. Mark, J. Senges; Herzzentrum NordrheinWestfalen, Bad Oeynhausen (3) C. Hoffmann, M. Farr,D. Horstkotte; Klinikum, Lippe (1) A. Cuneo, U. Tebbe;Universitätsklinik, Mainz (1) S. Genth-Zotz, T.Münzel; Switzerland Universitätsspital, Zurich(13) R. Corti, T. Lüscher; Steering Committee A.M. Zeiher (principal investigator), S. Dimmeler, V. Schächinger,W. Haberbosch, K.K. Haase, D. Mathey, R. Hambrecht; Study CoordinatingCenter, Frankfurt, Germany H. Braun, V. Schächinger;Angiographic Core Laboratory, Frankfurt, Germany B.Assmus, A.M. Zeiher; Safety Committee T. Bonzel (Fulda,Germany), W. Kasper (Wiesbaden, Germany).
Loinard, C., Ginouves, A., Vilar, J., Cochain, C., Zouggari, Y., Recalde, A., Duriez, M., Levy, B. I., Pouyssegur, J., Berra, E., Silvestre, J.-S.
(2009). Inhibition of Prolyl Hydroxylase Domain Proteins Promotes Therapeutic Revascularization. Circulation
120: 50-59
[Abstract][Full Text]
Boudoulas, K. D., Hatzopoulos, A. K.
(2009). Cardiac repair and regeneration: the Rubik's cube of cell therapy for heart disease. DMM
2: 344-358
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bahlmann, F. H., Fliser, D.
(2009). The plasticity of progenitor cells--why is it of interest to the nephrologists?. Nephrol Dial Transplant
24: 2018-2020
[Full Text]
Rolf, A., Nef, H. M., Mollmann, H., Troidl, C., Voss, S., Conradi, G., Rixe, J., Steiger, H., Beiring, K., Hamm, C. W., Dill, T.
(2009). Immunohistological basis of the late gadolinium enhancement phenomenon in tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J
30: 1635-1642
[Abstract][Full Text]
Yao, K., Huang, R., Sun, A., Qian, J., Liu, X., Ge, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., Niu, Y., Wang, Q., Zou, Y., Ge, J.
(2009). Repeated autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy in patients with large myocardial infarction. Eur J Heart Fail
11: 691-698
[Abstract][Full Text]
Willmann, J. K., Paulmurugan, R., Rodriguez-Porcel, M., Stein, W., Brinton, T. J., Connolly, A. J., Nielsen, C. H., Lutz, A. M., Lyons, J., Ikeno, F., Suzuki, Y., Rosenberg, J., Chen, I. Y., Wu, J. C., Yeung, A. C., Yock, P., Robbins, R. C., Gambhir, S. S.
(2009). Imaging Gene Expression in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells: From Small to Large Animals. Radiology
252: 117-127
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cao, F., Sun, D., Li, C., Narsinh, K., Zhao, L., Li, X., Feng, X., Zhang, J., Duan, Y., Wang, J., Liu, D., Wang, H.
(2009). Long-term myocardial functional improvement after autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells transplantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 4 years follow-up. Eur Heart J
0: ehp220v1-ehp220
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tendera, M., Wojakowski, W., Ruzyllo, W., Chojnowska, L., Kepka, C., Tracz, W., Musialek, P., Piwowarska, W., Nessler, J., Buszman, P., Grajek, S., Breborowicz, P., Majka, M., Ratajczak, M. Z., for the REGENT Investigators (REGENT investigators,
(2009). Intracoronary infusion of bone marrow-derived selected CD34+CXCR4+ cells and non-selected mononuclear cells in patients with acute STEMI and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: results of randomized, multicentre Myocardial Regeneration by Intracoronary Infusion of Selected Population of Stem Cells in Acute Myocardial Infarction (REGENT) Trial. Eur Heart J
30: 1313-1321
[Abstract][Full Text]
Landmesser, U.
(2009). Bone marrow cell therapy after myocardial infarction. What should we select?. Eur Heart J
30: 1310-1312
[Full Text]
Moriya, J., Minamino, T., Tateno, K., Shimizu, N., Kuwabara, Y., Sato, Y., Saito, Y., Komuro, I.
(2009). Long-Term Outcome of Therapeutic Neovascularization Using Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells for Limb Ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Intervent
2: 245-254
[Abstract][Full Text]
Penn, M. S.
(2009). Importance of the SDF-1:CXCR4 Axis in Myocardial Repair. Circ. Res.
104: 1133-1135
[Full Text]
Capoccia, B. J., Robson, D. L., Levac, K. D., Maxwell, D. J., Hohm, S. A., Neelamkavil, M. J., Bell, G. I., Xenocostas, A., Link, D. C., Piwnica-Worms, D., Nolta, J. A., Hess, D. A.
(2009). Revascularization of ischemic limbs after transplantation of human bone marrow cells with high aldehyde dehydrogenase activity. Blood
113: 5340-5351
[Abstract][Full Text]
van Ramshorst, J., Bax, J. J., Beeres, S. L. M. A., Dibbets-Schneider, P., Roes, S. D., Stokkel, M. P. M., de Roos, A., Fibbe, W. E., Zwaginga, J. J., Boersma, E., Schalij, M. J., Atsma, D. E.
(2009). Intramyocardial Bone Marrow Cell Injection for Chronic Myocardial Ischemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA
301: 1997-2004
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sieveking, D. P, Ng, M. K.
(2009). Cell therapies for therapeutic angiogenesis: back to the bench. Vasc Med
14: 153-166
[Abstract]
Li, S.-H., Lai, T. Y.Y., Sun, Z., Han, M., Moriyama, E., Wilson, B., Fazel, S., Weisel, R. D., Yau, T., Wu, J. C., Li, R.-K.
(2009). Tracking cardiac engraftment and distribution of implanted bone marrow cells: Comparing intra-aortic, intravenous, and intramyocardial delivery.. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.
137: 1225-33.e1
[Abstract][Full Text]
Macia, E., Boyden, P. A.
(2009). Stem Cell Therapy Is Proarrhythmic. Circulation
119: 1814-1823
[Full Text]
Ly, H. Q., Nattel, S.
(2009). Stem Cells Are Not Proarrhythmic: Letting the Genie out of the Bottle. Circulation
119: 1824-1831
[Full Text]
Xiao, Q., Xu, Q.
(2009). Caspase-8, a Double-Edged Sword for EPC Functioning. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.
29: 444-446
[Full Text]
Scharner, D., Rossig, L., Carmona, G., Chavakis, E., Urbich, C., Fischer, A., Kang, T.-B., Wallach, D., Chiang, Y. J., Deribe, Y. L., Dikic, I., Zeiher, A. M., Dimmeler, S.
(2009). Caspase-8 Is Involved in Neovascularization-Promoting Progenitor Cell Functions. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.
29: 571-578
[Abstract][Full Text]
Herbots, L., D'hooge, J., Eroglu, E., Thijs, D., Ganame, J., Claus, P., Dubois, C., Theunissen, K., Bogaert, J., Dens, J., Kalantzi, M., Dymarkowski, S., Bijnens, B., Belmans, A., Boogaerts, M., Sutherland, G., Van de Werf, F., Rademakers, F., Janssens, S.
(2009). Improved regional function after autologous bone marrow-derived stem cell transfer in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized, double-blind strain rate imaging study. Eur Heart J
30: 662-670
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tendera, M., Wojakowski, W.
(2009). Cell therapy--success does not come easy. Eur Heart J
30: 640-641
[Full Text]
Hamamoto, H., Gorman, J. H. III, Ryan, L. P., Hinmon, R., Martens, T. P., Schuster, M. D., Plappert, T., Kiupel, M., St. John-Sutton, M. G., Itescu, S., Gorman, R. C.
(2009). Allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cell therapy to limit remodeling after myocardial infarction: the effect of cell dosage.. Ann. Thorac. Surg.
87: 794-801
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mollmann, H., Nef, H., Elsasser, A., Hamm, C.
(2009). Stem cells in myocardial infarction: from bench to bedside. Heart
95: 508-514
[Full Text]
Lucia, A, De La Rosa, A, Silvan, M A., Lopez-Mojares, L M, Boraita, A, Perez, M, Foster, C, Garcia-Castro, J, Ramirez, M
(2009). Mobilisation of mesenchymal cells in cardiac patients: is intense exercise necessary?. Br. J. Sports. Med.
43: 221-223
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bagi, Z., Kaley, G.
(2009). Where Have All the Stem Cells Gone?. Circ. Res.
104: 280-281
[Full Text]
Jeong, J.-O., Kim, M.-O., Kim, H., Lee, M.-Y., Kim, S.-W., Ii, M., Lee, J.-u., Lee, J., Choi, Y. J., Cho, H.-J., Lee, N., Silver, M., Wecker, A., Kim, D.-W., Yoon, Y.-s.
(2009). Dual Angiogenic and Neurotrophic Effects of Bone Marrow-Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cells on Diabetic Neuropathy. Circulation
119: 699-708
[Abstract][Full Text]
Nicolini, F., Gherli, T.
(2009). Alternatives to transplantation in the surgical therapy for heart failure. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.
35: 214-228
[Abstract][Full Text]
Schirmer, S H, van Nooijen, F C, Piek, J J, van Royen, N
(2009). Stimulation of collateral artery growth: travelling further down the road to clinical application. Heart
95: 191-197
[Abstract][Full Text]
Frank, K. F, Muller-Ehmsen, J.
(2009). Angiostatin: drying out the roots in cardiac muscle. Heart
95: 269-270
[Full Text]
The STEPS Participants,
(2009). Stem Cell Therapies as an Emerging Paradigm in Stroke (STEPS): Bridging Basic and Clinical Science for Cellular and Neurogenic Factor Therapy in Treating Stroke. Stroke
40: 510-515
[Abstract][Full Text]
Reffelmann, T., Konemann, S., Kloner, R. A.
(2009). Promise of Blood- and Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cell Transplantation for Functional Cardiac Repair Putting It in Perspective With Existing Therapy.. J Am Coll Cardiol
53: 305-308
[Abstract][Full Text]
Strauer, B.-E., Ott, G., Schannwell, C. M., Brehm, M.
(2009). Bone marrow cells to improve ventricular function. Heart
95: 98-99
[Full Text]
van Ramshorst, J, Atsma, D E, Beeres, S L M A, Mollema, S A, Ajmone Marsan, N, Holman, E R, van der Wall, E E, Schalij, M J, Bax, J J
(2009). Effect of intramyocardial bone marrow cell injection on left ventricular dyssynchrony and global strain. Heart
95: 119-124
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pula, G., Mayr, U., Evans, C., Prokopi, M., Vara, D. S., Yin, X., Astroulakis, Z., Xiao, Q., Hill, J., Xu, Q., Mayr, M.
(2009). Proteomics Identifies Thymidine Phosphorylase As a Key Regulator of the Angiogenic Potential of Colony-Forming Units and Endothelial Progenitor Cell Cultures. Circ. Res.
104: 32-40
[Abstract][Full Text]
Urish, K. L., Vella, J. B., Okada, M., Deasy, B. M., Tobita, K., Keller, B. B., Cao, B., Piganelli, J. D., Huard, J.
(2009). Antioxidant Levels Represent a Major Determinant in the Regenerative Capacity of Muscle Stem Cells. Mol. Biol. Cell
20: 509-520
[Abstract][Full Text]
Chien, K. R., Domian, I. J., Parker, K. K.
(2008). Cardiogenesis and the Complex Biology of Regenerative Cardiovascular Medicine. Science
322: 1494-1497
[Abstract][Full Text]
Korf-Klingebiel, M., Kempf, T., Sauer, T., Brinkmann, E., Fischer, P., Meyer, G. P., Ganser, A., Drexler, H., Wollert, K. C.
(2008). Bone marrow cells are a rich source of growth factors and cytokines: implications for cell therapy trials after myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J
29: 2851-2858
[Abstract][Full Text]
van Oostrom, M. C., van Oostrom, O., Quax, P. H. A., Verhaar, M. C., Hoefer, I. E.
(2008). Insights into mechanisms behind arteriogenesis: what does the future hold?. J. Leukoc. Biol.
84: 1379-1391
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kische, S., Nienaber, C. A., Ince, H.
(2008). Clinical view on experimental stem cell and cytokine research in cardiac disease. Eur Heart J Suppl
10: K2-K6
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lunde, K., Aakhus, S.
(2008). Intracoronary injection of mononuclear bone marrow cells after acute myocardial infarction: lessons from the ASTAMI trial. Eur Heart J Suppl
10: K35-K38
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kang, H.-J., Kim, H.-S.
(2008). Safety and efficacy of intracoronary infusion of mobilized peripheral blood stem cell in patients with myocardial infarction: MAGIC Cell-1 and MAGIC Cell-3-DES-trials. Eur Heart J Suppl
10: K39-K43
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gnecchi, M., Zhang, Z., Ni, A., Dzau, V. J.
(2008). Paracrine Mechanisms in Adult Stem Cell Signaling and Therapy. Circ. Res.
103: 1204-1219
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ziebart, T., Yoon, C.-H., Trepels, T., Wietelmann, A., Braun, T., Kiessling, F., Stein, S., Grez, M., Ihling, C., Muhly-Reinholz, M., Carmona, G., Urbich, C., Zeiher, A. M., Dimmeler, S.
(2008). Sustained Persistence of Transplanted Proangiogenic Cells Contributes to Neovascularization and Cardiac Function After Ischemia. Circ. Res.
103: 1327-1334
[Abstract][Full Text]
Huikuri, H. V., Kervinen, K., Niemela, M., Ylitalo, K., Saily, M., Koistinen, P., Savolainen, E.-R., Ukkonen, H., Pietila, M., Airaksinen, J. K.E., Knuuti, J., Makikallio, T. H., for the FINCELL Investigators,
(2008). Effects of intracoronary injection of mononuclear bone marrow cells on left ventricular function, arrhythmia risk profile, and restenosis after thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J
29: 2723-2732
[Abstract][Full Text]
Aicher, A., Kollet, O., Heeschen, C., Liebner, S., Urbich, C., Ihling, C., Orlandi, A., Lapidot, T., Zeiher, A. M., Dimmeler, S.
(2008). The Wnt Antagonist Dickkopf-1 Mobilizes Vasculogenic Progenitor Cells via Activation of the Bone Marrow Endosteal Stem Cell Niche. Circ. Res.
103: 796-803
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hendry, S. L. II, van der Bogt, K. E.A., Sheikh, A. Y., Arai, T., Dylla, S. J., Drukker, M., McConnell, M. V., Kutschka, I., Hoyt, G., Cao, F., Weissman, I. L., Connolly, A. J., Pelletier, M. P., Wu, J. C., Robbins, R. C., Yang, P. C.
(2008). Multimodal evaluation of in vivo magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial restoration by mouse embryonic stem cells.. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.
136: 1028-1037.e1
[Abstract][Full Text]
Yamada, S., Nelson, T. J., Crespo-Diaz, R. J., Perez-Terzic, C., Liu, X.-K., Miki, T., Seino, S., Behfar, A., Terzic, A.
(2008). Embryonic Stem Cell Therapy of Heart Failure in Genetic Cardiomyopathy. Stem Cells
26: 2644-2653
[Abstract][Full Text]
Schachinger, V., Aicher, A., Dobert, N., Rover, R., Diener, J., Fichtlscherer, S., Assmus, B., Seeger, F. H., Menzel, C., Brenner, W., Dimmeler, S., Zeiher, A. M.
(2008). Pilot Trial on Determinants of Progenitor Cell Recruitment to the Infarcted Human Myocardium. Circulation
118: 1425-1432
[Abstract][Full Text]
van der Bogt, K. E.A., Sheikh, A. Y., Schrepfer, S., Hoyt, G., Cao, F., Ransohoff, K. J., Swijnenburg, R.-J., Pearl, J., Lee, A., Fischbein, M., Contag, C. H., Robbins, R. C., Wu, J. C.
(2008). Comparison of Different Adult Stem Cell Types for Treatment of Myocardial Ischemia. Circulation
118: S121-S129
[Abstract][Full Text]
Farahmand, P., Lai, T. Y.Y., Weisel, R. D., Fazel, S., Yau, T., Menasche, P., Li, R.-K.
(2008). Skeletal Myoblasts Preserve Remote Matrix Architecture and Global Function When Implanted Early or Late After Coronary Ligation Into Infarcted or Remote Myocardium. Circulation
118: S130-S137
[Abstract][Full Text]
Foubert, P., Matrone, G., Souttou, B., Lere-Dean, C., Barateau, V., Plouet, J., Le Ricousse-Roussanne, S., Levy, B. I., Silvestre, J.-S., Tobelem, G.
(2008). Coadministration of Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Progenitor Cells Enhances the Efficiency of Proangiogenic Cell-Based Therapy. Circ. Res.
103: 751-760
[Abstract][Full Text]
Beeres, S. L M A, Atsma, D. E, van Ramshorst, J., Schalij, M. J, Bax, J. J
(2008). Cell therapy for ischaemic heart disease. Heart
94: 1214-1226
[Full Text]
Gyongyosi, M., Blanco, J., Marian, T., Tron, L., Petnehazy, O., Petrasi, Z., Hemetsberger, R., Rodriguez, J., Font, G., Pavo, I. J., Kertesz, I., Balkay, L., Pavo, N., Posa, A., Emri, M., Galuska, L., Kraitchman, D. L., Wojta, J., Huber, K., Glogar, D.
(2008). Serial Noninvasive In Vivo Positron Emission Tomographic Tracking of Percutaneously Intramyocardially Injected Autologous Porcine Mesenchymal Stem Cells Modified for Transgene Reporter Gene Expression. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
1: 94-103
[Abstract][Full Text]
Yao, K, Huang, R, Qian, J, Cui, J, Ge, L, Li, Y, Zhang, F, Shi, H, Huang, D, Zhang, S, Sun, A, Zou, Y, Ge, J
(2008). Administration of intracoronary bone marrow mononuclear cells on chronic myocardial infarction improves diastolic function. Heart
94: 1147-1153
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tanabe, S., Sato, Y., Suzuki, T., Suzuki, K., Nagao, T., Yamaguchi, T.
(2008). Gene Expression Profiling of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Identification of Novel Markers in Early- and Late-Stage Cell Culture. J Biochem
144: 399-408
[Abstract][Full Text]
Psaltis, P. J., Zannettino, A. C.W., Worthley, S. G., Gronthos, S.
(2008). Concise Review: Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Potential for Cardiovascular Repair. Stem Cells
26: 2201-2210
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lunde, K., Aakhus, S.
(2008). Cell therapy in acute myocardial infarction: measures of efficacy. Heart
94: 969-970
[Full Text]
Rupp, S., Koyanagi, M., Iwasaki, M., Bauer, J., von Gerlach, S., Schranz, D., Zeiher, A. M., Dimmeler, S.
(2008). Characterization of long-term endogenous cardiac repair in children after heart transplantation. Eur Heart J
29: 1867-1872
[Abstract][Full Text]
Martin-Rendon, E., Brunskill, S. J., Hyde, C. J., Stanworth, S. J., Mathur, A., Watt, S. M.
(2008). Autologous bone marrow stem cells to treat acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Eur Heart J
29: 1807-1818
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tossios, P., Krausgrill, B., Schmidt, M., Fischer, T., Halbach, M., Fries, J. W.U., Fahnenstich, S., Frommolt, P., Heppelmann, I., Schmidt, A., Schomacker, K., Fischer, J. H., Bloch, W., Mehlhorn, U., Schwinger, R. H.G., Muller-Ehmsen, J.
(2008). Role of balloon occlusion for mononuclear bone marrow cell deposition after intracoronary injection in pigs with reperfused myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J
29: 1911-1921
[Abstract][Full Text]
Chang, S-A, Kim, H-K, Lee, H-Y, Choi, S-Y, Koo, B-K, Kim, Y-J, Sohn, D-W, Oh, B-H, Park, Y-B, Choi, Y-S, Kang, H-J, Kim, H-S
(2008). Restoration of left ventricular synchronous contraction after acute myocardial infarction by stem cell therapy: new insights into the therapeutic implication of stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Heart
94: 995-1001
[Abstract][Full Text]
Chase, A J, Fretz, E B, Warburton, W P, Klinke, W P, Carere, R G, Pi, D, Berry, B, Hilton, J D
(2008). Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart
94: 1019-1025
[Abstract][Full Text]
Carr, C. A., Stuckey, D. J., Tatton, L., Tyler, D. J., Hale, S. J. M., Sweeney, D., Schneider, J. E., Martin-Rendon, E., Radda, G. K., Harding, S. E., Watt, S. M., Clarke, K.
(2008). Bone marrow-derived stromal cells home to and remain in the infarcted rat heart but fail to improve function: an in vivo cine-MRI study. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
295: H533-H542
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ward, M. R., Stewart, D. J.
(2008). Erythropoietin and mesenchymal stromal cells in angiogenesis and myocardial regeneration: one plus one equals three?. Cardiovasc Res
79: 357-359
[Full Text]
Stone, G. W.
(2008). Angioplasty Strategies in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Part II: Intervention After Fibrinolytic Therapy, Integrated Treatment Recommendations, and Future Directions. Circulation
118: 552-566
[Full Text]
Burchfield, J. S., Iwasaki, M., Koyanagi, M., Urbich, C., Rosenthal, N., Zeiher, A. M., Dimmeler, S.
(2008). Interleukin-10 From Transplanted Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Contributes to Cardiac Protection After Myocardial Infarction. Circ. Res.
103: 203-211
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rota, M., Padin-Iruegas, M. E., Misao, Y., De Angelis, A., Maestroni, S., Ferreira-Martins, J., Fiumana, E., Rastaldo, R., Arcarese, M. L., Mitchell, T. S., Boni, A., Bolli, R., Urbanek, K., Hosoda, T., Anversa, P., Leri, A., Kajstura, J.
(2008). Local Activation or Implantation of Cardiac Progenitor Cells Rescues Scarred Infarcted Myocardium Improving Cardiac Function. Circ. Res.
103: 107-116
[Abstract][Full Text]
Atoui, R., Shum-Tim, D., Chiu, R. C.J.
(2008). Myocardial Regenerative Therapy: Immunologic Basis for the Potential "Universal Donor Cells". Ann. Thorac. Surg.
86: 327-334
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hung, T.-C., Suzuki, Y., Urashima, T., Caffarelli, A., Hoyt, G., Sheikh, A. Y., Yeung, A. C., Weissman, I., Robbins, R. C., Bulte, J. M., Yang, P. C.
(2008). Multimodality Evaluation of the Viability of Stem Cells Delivered Into Different Zones of Myocardial Infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
1: 6-13
[Abstract][Full Text]
Surdacki, A., Marewicz, E., Wieteska, E., Szastak, G., Rakowski, T., Wieczorek-Surdacka, E., Dudek, D., Pryjma, J., Dubiel, J. S.
(2008). Association between endothelial progenitor cell depletion in blood and mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency in stable angina. Nephrol Dial Transplant
23: 2265-2273
[Abstract][Full Text]
Diederichsen, A. C.P., Moller, J. E., Thayssen, P., Junker, A. B., Videbaek, L., Saekmose, S. G., Barington, T., Kristiansen, M., Kassem, M.
(2008). Effect of repeated intracoronary injection of bone marrow cells in patients with ischaemic heart failure The Danish Stem Cell study--Congestive Heart Failure trial (DanCell-CHF). Eur J Heart Fail
10: 661-667
[Abstract][Full Text]
Chang, S.-A, Lee, E. J., Kang, H.-J., Zhang, S.-Y., Kim, J.-H., Li, L., Youn, S.-W., Lee, C.-S., Kim, K.-H., Won, J.-Y., Sohn, J.-W., Park, K.-W., Cho, H.-J., Yang, S.-E., Oh, W. I., Yang, Y. S., Ho, W.-K., Park, Y.-B., Kim, H.-S.
(2008). Impact of Myocardial Infarct Proteins and Oscillating Pressure on the Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Effect of Acute Myocardial Infarction on Stem Cell Differentiation. Stem Cells
26: 1901-1912
[Abstract][Full Text]
Penn, M. S., Mangi, A. A.
(2008). Genetic Enhancement of Stem Cell Engraftment, Survival, and Efficacy. Circ. Res.
102: 1471-1482
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rupp, S., Koyanagi, M., Iwasaki, M., Diehl, F., Bushoven, P., Schranz, D., Zeiher, A. M., Dimmeler, S.
(2008). Genetic proof-of-concept for cardiac gene expression in human circulating blood-derived progenitor cells.. J Am Coll Cardiol
51: 2289-2290
[Full Text]
Kasama, S., Furuya, M., Toyama, T., Ichikawa, S., Kurabayashi, M.
(2008). Effect of atrial natriuretic peptide on left ventricular remodelling in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J
29: 1485-1494
[Abstract][Full Text]
Zhao, T. C., Tseng, A., Yano, N., Tseng, Y., Davol, P. A., Lee, R. J., Lum, L. G., Padbury, J. F.
(2008). Targeting human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells with anti-CD45 x anti-myosin light-chain bispecific antibody preserves cardiac function in myocardial infarction. J. Appl. Physiol.
104: 1793-1800
[Abstract][Full Text]
Veltman, C. E., Soliman, O. I.I., Geleijnse, M. L., Vletter, W. B., Smits, P. C., ten Cate, F. J., Jordaens, L. J., Balk, A. H.H.M., Serruys, P. W., Boersma, E., van Domburg, R. T., van der Giessen, W. J.
(2008). Four-year follow-up of treatment with intramyocardial skeletal myoblasts injection in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J
29: 1386-1396
[Abstract][Full Text]
Nelson, T. J., Faustino, R. S., Chiriac, A., Crespo-Diaz, R., Behfar, A., Terzic, A.
(2008). CXCR4+/FLK-1+ Biomarkers Select a Cardiopoietic Lineage from Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem Cells
26: 1464-1473
[Abstract][Full Text]
Dawn, B., Tiwari, S., Kucia, M. J., Zuba-Surma, E. K., Guo, Y., SanganalMath, S. K., Abdel-Latif, A., Hunt, G., Vincent, R. J., Taher, H., Reed, N. J., Ratajczak, M. Z., Bolli, R.
(2008). Transplantation of Bone Marrow-Derived Very Small Embryonic-Like Stem Cells Attenuates Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction. Stem Cells
26: 1646-1655
[Abstract][Full Text]
Zampetaki, A., Kirton, J. P., Xu, Q.
(2008). Vascular repair by endothelial progenitor cells. Cardiovasc Res
78: 413-421
[Abstract][Full Text]
Smart, N., Riley, P. R.
(2008). The Stem Cell Movement. Circ. Res.
102: 1155-1168
[Abstract][Full Text]