Five-Year Follow-up of Patients Receiving Imatinib for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Brian J. Druker, M.D., François Guilhot, M.D., Stephen G. O'Brien, M.D., Ph.D., Insa Gathmann, M.Sc., Hagop Kantarjian, M.D., Norbert Gattermann, M.D., Michael W.N. Deininger, M.D., Ph.D., Richard T. Silver, M.D., John M. Goldman, D.M., Richard M. Stone, M.D., Francisco Cervantes, M.D., Andreas Hochhaus, M.D., Bayard L. Powell, M.D., Janice L. Gabrilove, M.D., Philippe Rousselot, M.D., Josy Reiffers, M.D., Jan J. Cornelissen, M.D., Ph.D., Timothy Hughes, M.D., Hermine Agis, M.D., Thomas Fischer, M.D., Gregor Verhoef, M.D., John Shepherd, M.D., Giuseppe Saglio, M.D., Alois Gratwohl, M.D., Johan L. Nielsen, M.D., Jerald P. Radich, M.D., Bengt Simonsson, M.D., Kerry Taylor, M.D., Michele Baccarani, M.D., Charlene So, Pharm.D., Laurie Letvak, M.D., Richard A. Larson, M.D., for the IRIS Investigators
Background The cause of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is aconstitutively active BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase. Imatinib inhibitsthis kinase, and in a short-term study was superior to interferonalfa plus cytarabine for newly diagnosed CML in the chronicphase. For 5 years, we followed patients with CML who receivedimatinib as initial therapy.
Methods We randomly assigned 553 patients to receive imatiniband 553 to receive interferon alfa plus cytarabine and thenevaluated them for overall and event-free survival; progressionto accelerated-phase CML or blast crisis; hematologic, cytogenetic,and molecular responses; and adverse events.
Results The median follow-up was 60 months. KaplanMeierestimates of cumulative best rates of complete cytogenetic responseamong patients receiving imatinib were 69% by 12 months and87% by 60 months. An estimated 7% of patients progressed toaccelerated-phase CML or blast crisis, and the estimated overallsurvival of patients who received imatinib as initial therapywas 89% at 60 months. Patients who had a complete cytogeneticresponse or in whom levels of BCR-ABL transcripts had fallenby at least 3 log had a significantly lower risk of diseaseprogression than did patients without a complete cytogeneticresponse (P<0.001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events diminishedover time, and there was no clinically significant change inthe profile of adverse events.
Conclusions After 5 years of follow-up, continuous treatmentof chronic-phase CML with imatinib as initial therapy was foundto induce durable responses in a high proportion of patients.(ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00006343
[ClinicalTrials.gov]
.)
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative disordercharacterized by the expansion of a clone of hematopoietic cellsthat carries the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph).1 The Ph chromosomeresults from a reciprocal translocation between the long armsof chromosomes 9 and 22, t(9;22)(q34;q11).2 The molecular consequenceof this translocation is a novel fusion gene, BCR-ABL, whichencodes a constitutively active protein, tyrosine kinase.3,4,5Imatinib (Gleevec, Novartis; formerly called STI571) is a relativelyspecific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase and has efficacyin CML.6,7,8,9,10,11
Before the availability of imatinib, interferon alfa plus cytarabinewas considered standard therapy for patients with CML who werenot planning to undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.12,13A randomized trial that compared imatinib with interferon alfaplus cytarabine in the chronic phase of CML demonstrated thesignificant superiority of imatinib in all standard indicatorsof the disease within a median follow-up of 19 months.14 Thetrial was designed as a crossover study, and given the superiorresults with imatinib, a large proportion of patients in theinterferon group switched to imatinib. In addition, at the timeof Food and Drug Administration approval of imatinib, many patientswho were assigned to receive interferon alfa plus cytarabineleft the study. Consequently, the trial has evolved into a long-termstudy of the result of treating newly diagnosed patients inthe chronic phase of CML with imatinib. We now report 60 monthsof follow-up data and focus on patients who received imatinibas a primary treatment.
Methods
Study Design
The design of the study has been described previously.14 TheInternational Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS)was a multicenter, international, open-label, phase III randomizedstudy. Eligible patients had to be between 18 and 70 years ofage, must have been diagnosed with Ph-positive CML in chronicphase within 6 months before study entry, and must not havereceived treatment for CML, except for hydroxyurea or anagrelide.
Patients were recruited from June 2000 through January 2001and were randomly assigned to receive imatinib at a dose of400 mg orally per day or subcutaneous interferon alfa at a dailytarget dose of 5 million U per square meter of body-surfacearea, plus 10-day cycles of cytarabine at a daily dose of 20mg per square meter every month. Patients receiving imatinibwho did not have a complete hematologic response within 3 monthsor whose bone marrow contained more than 65% Ph-positive cellsat 12 months could have a stepwise increase in the dose of imatinibto 400 mg orally twice daily as long as there were no dose-limitingadverse events. Patients were allowed to cross over to the othertreatment group if they did not achieve either a complete hematologicresponse after 6 months of therapy or a major cytogenetic responseafter 12 months or if they had a relapse or an increase in white-cellcount or could not tolerate treatment. All crossover requestswere made anonymously and considered weekly by the study managementcommittee (see the Appendix).
End Points
The primary end point was event-free survival, which was referredto in previous presentations and articles as the time to progression,or progression-free survival. Events were defined by the firstoccurrence of any of the following: death from any cause duringtreatment, progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisisof CML, or loss of a complete hematologic or major cytogeneticresponse. Secondary end points were the rate of complete hematologicresponse (defined as a leukocyte count <10x109 per liter,a platelet count of <450x109 per liter, <5% myelocytesplus metamyelocytes, no blasts or promyelocytes, no extramedullaryinvolvement, and no signs of the accelerated phase or blastcrisis of CML); a cytogenetic response in marrow cells, categorizedas complete (no Ph-positive metaphases), partial (1 to 35% Ph-positivemetaphases), or major (complete plus partial responses) on thebasis of G-banding in at least 20 cells in metaphase per sample;progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis; overallsurvival; safety; and tolerability. Signs of a molecular responsewere sought every 3 months after a complete cytogenetic responsewas obtained with the use of real-time quantitative polymerasechain reaction to measure the ratio of BCR-ABL transcripts toBCR transcripts. Results were expressed as "log reductions"below a standardized baseline derived from a median ratio ofBCR-ABL to BCR obtained from 30 untreated patients with chronic-phaseCML.15
Ethics and Study Management
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration ofHelsinki. The study protocol was reviewed by the ethics committeeor institutional review board at each participating center.All patients gave written informed consent, according to institutionalregulations. The academic investigators and representativesof the sponsor, Novartis, designed the study. Data-managementand statistical-support staff at a contract research organizationcollected the data, which were analyzed and interpreted by abiostatistician from Novartis in close collaboration with theinvestigators. The study management committee and all academicinvestigators had access to the raw data. The study managementcommittee, composed of four academic investigators, served asthe writing committee. Along with the Novartis biostatistician,they vouch for the accuracy and completeness of the data.
Statistical Analysis
The study is ongoing, but January 31, 2006, was the cutoff datefor this analysis. This date marked 5 to 5.5 years after patientsstarted to receive imatinib treatment. We followed all 553 patientswho were assigned to receive imatinib for an analysis of safetyand efficacy until they stopped taking imatinib, and we havecontinued to follow all patients until death, loss to follow-up,or withdrawal of consent. Survival data were also collectedon patients who underwent bone marrow transplantation afterimatinib treatment. We performed analyses of survival and event-freesurvival, using the KaplanMeier method according to theintention-to-treat principle and using all data available, regardlessof whether crossover occurred. Differences between subgroupsof patients receiving imatinib were calculated by the log-ranktest. Cumulative rates of complete hematologic and cytogeneticresponses were estimated according to the KaplanMeiermethod, in which data from patients receiving imatinib who didnot have an adequate response, who had switched to interferonalfa plus cytarabine, or who had discontinued treatment forreasons other than progression of CML were censored at the lastfollow-up visit. For the estimation of cumulative response rates,we censored data from patients with progressive CML at maximumfollow-up. We used the life-table method to determine yearlyevent probabilities. The safety of imatinib was analyzed for551 patients who received at least one dose of the study drugduring the trial. For the 553 patients assigned to receive interferonalfa plus cytarabine, disposition and overall survival weresummarized.
Results
Patients
Five years after the last of 1106 patients had started treatment,and with a median of 60 months of follow-up, 382 of 553 patients(69%) in the imatinib group and 16 of 553 patients (3%) in thegroup given interferon alfa plus cytarabine continued with theirinitially assigned treatment (Table 1). Of the patients giveninterferon plus cytarabine, 359 (65%) had crossed over to imatinib,whereas 14 patients (3%) in the imatinib group had switchedto the alternative treatment. The most common reason for crossoveramong patients given interferon plus cytarabine was intoleranceof treatment (26%). Of these patients, 90 (16%) switched becausethey did not achieve a complete hematologic or major cytogeneticresponse by the designated target dates, as did 77 patients(14%) with disease progression. An additional 178 patients (32%)given interferon alfa plus cytarabine discontinued therapy.The reasons most commonly reported were withdrawal of consent(14%) and adverse events (6%). In the imatinib group, 23 patients(4%) discontinued therapy owing to an adverse event, and 25patients (5%) withdrew consent (Table 1).
Table 1. Enrollment, Outcomes, and Reasons for Crossover and Discontinuation.
Since few patients were still receiving interferon alfa pluscytarabine at 60 months, the remainder of this report focuseson the long-term follow-up of patients who received imatinibas the initial therapy for CML. They had been treated with imatinibfor a mean (±SD) of 50±19 months (median, 60 months).Among the 382 patients who continued receiving imatinib, themean daily dose during this reporting period was 382±50mg. In 82% of these patients, the last reported daily dose was400 mg; 6% were receiving 600 mg, 4% were receiving 800 mg,and 8% were receiving less than 400 mg.
Adverse Events
After a median follow-up of 60 months, the adverse events reportedwere similar to those reported previously.14 The most commonlyreported adverse events were edema (including peripheral andperiorbital edema) (60%), muscle cramps (49%), diarrhea (45%),nausea (50%), musculoskeletal pain (47%), rash and other skinproblems (40%), abdominal pain (37%), fatigue (39%), joint pain(31%), and headache (37%). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events consistedof neutropenia (17%), thrombocytopenia (9%), anemia (4%), elevatedliver enzymes (5%), and other drug-related adverse events (17%).Congestive heart failure was reported as being drug-relatedin one patient (<1%). Newly occurring or worsening grade3 or 4 hematologic or biochemical adverse events were infrequentafter both 2 and 4 years of therapy (Table 2).
Table 2. Proportion of Patients Receiving First-Line Imatinib Therapy with Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Events.
Efficacy
Figure 1 shows the estimated cumulative rates of complete hematologicremission: 96% at 12 months and 98% at 60 months. The best observedrate of complete hematologic response was 97%. At 12 months,the estimated rate of major cytogenic response was 85% and thatof complete cytogenetic response was 69%. At 60 months, theestimated rates were 92% and 87%, respectively. With a medianfollow-up of 60 months, the best observed rate of major cytogeneticresponse was 89%, and the best rate of complete cytogeneticresponse was 82%. Of the 382 patients who still received imatinibat 60 months, 368 (96%) had a complete cytogenetic response.
Figure 1. KaplanMeier Estimates of the Cumulative Best Response to Initial Imatinib Therapy.
At 12 months after the initiation of imatinib, the estimated rates of having a response were as follows: complete hematologic response, 96%; major cytogenetic response, 85%; and complete cytogenetic response, 69%. At 60 months, the respective rates were 98%, 92%, and 87%. Data for patients who discontinued imatinib for reasons other than progression and who did not have an adequate response were censored at the last follow-up visit. Data for patients who did not have an adequate response and who stopped imatinib because of progression were censored at maximum follow-up.
There were significant differences in the rates of cytogeneticresponse, according to a scoring system devised by Sokal andcolleagues,16 which divides patients with CML into low-risk,intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups. In patients who weredeemed to be at low risk on the Sokal scoring system, the rateof complete cytogenetic response was 89%; the rate among patientsat intermediate risk was 82%; and for those at high risk, therate was 69% (P<0.001).
Among 124 patients who had a complete cytogenetic response andwhose blood samples taken at 1 and 4 years were available, BCR-ABLtranscripts in the blood samples were measured. After 1 year,levels of BCR-ABL transcripts had fallen by at least 3 log in66 of 124 patients (53%); after 4 years, levels had fallen in99 of 124 patients (80%) (P<0.001). The proportion of patientswith a reduction of at least 4 log in transcript levels increasedfrom 22 to 41% between 1 and 4 years (P<0.001). The medianlog reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts was 3.08 at 1 year and3.78 at 4 years (P<0.001).
Long-Term Outcomes
At 60 months, the estimated rate of event-free survival was83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79 to 87), and an estimated93% of patients (95% CI, 90 to 96) had not progressed to theaccelerated phase or blast crisis (Figure 2). Of the 553 patientsreceiving imatinib, 35 (6%) progressed to the accelerated phaseor blast crisis, 14 (3%) had a hematologic relapse, 28 (5%)had a loss of major cytogenetic response, and 9 (2%) died froma cause unrelated to CML. The estimated annual rate of treatmentfailure after the start of imatinib therapy was 3.3% in thefirst year, 7.5% in the second year, 4.8% in the third year,1.5% in the fourth year, and 0.9% in the fifth year. The correspondingannual rates of progression to the accelerated phase or blastcrisis were 1.5%, 2.8%, 1.6%, 0.9%, and 0.6%, respectively.In the 454 patients who had a complete cytogenetic response,the annual rates of treatment failure were 5.5% in the firstyear, 2.3% in the second year, 1.1% in the third year, and 0.4%in the fourth year after a response was achieved. The correspondingannual rates of progression to the accelerated phase or blastcrisis were 2.1%, 0.8%, 0.3%, and 0%, respectively, in thesepatients.
Figure 2. KaplanMeier Estimates of the Rates of Event-free Survival and Progression to the Accelerated Phase or Blast Crisis of CML for Patients Receiving Imatinib.
At 60 months, the estimated rate of event-free survival was 83%. At that time, 93% of the patients had not progressed to the accelerated phase or blast crisis. The following were considered events: death from any cause during treatment, progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis, loss of a complete hematologic response, loss of a major cytogenetic response, or an increasing white-cell count. The number of patients with events and the number of patients available for analysis are shown.
Effect of Response on Outcome
Cytogenetic and molecular responses had significant associationswith event-free survival and deterrence against progressionto the accelerated phase or blast crisis (Figure 3). A landmarkanalysis of the 350 patients who had had a complete cytogeneticresponse at 12 months after the initiation of imatinib treatmentrevealed that at 60 months, 97% of the patients (95% CI, 94to 99) had not progressed to the accelerated phase or blastcrisis. For the 86 patients with a partial cytogenetic response,the estimate was 93% (95% CI, 87 to 99); for the 73 patientswho did not have a major cytogenetic response within 12 months,the estimate was 81% (95% CI, 70 to 92) (overall, P<0.001;P<0.001 for the comparison between patients with a completeresponse and those without a complete response, and P=0.20 forthe comparison between patients with a complete response andthose with a partial response) (Figure 3A).
Figure 3. Rate of Progression to the Accelerated Phase or Blast Crisis on the Basis of Cytogenetic Response after 12 Months or Molecular Response after 18 Months of Imatinib Therapy.
Panel A shows that at 60 months, of the 350 patients with a complete cytogenetic response after 12 months of imatinib therapy, an estimated 97% had not progressed to the accelerated phase or blast crisis. The corresponding rates for 86 patients with a partial cytogenetic response and for 73 patients who did not have a major cytogenetic response were 93% and 81%, respectively (P<0.001; P=0.20 for the comparison between patients with a complete cytogenetic response and those with a partial response). At 12 months, 44 patients had discontinued imatinib and thus were not included in this analysis. Panel B shows that at 60 months, of the 139 patients with a complete cytogenetic response and a reduction in levels of BCR-ABL transcripts of at least 3 log, 100% were free from progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis. The corresponding rate for 54 patients with a complete cytogenetic response and a reduction in levels of BCR-ABL transcripts of less than 3 log was 98%; the rate for 88 patients without a complete cytogenetic response was 87% (P<0.001; P=0.11 for the comparison between patients with a major molecular response and those without a major molecular response). At 18 months, 86 patients had discontinued imatinib and 186 patients had achieved a complete cytogenetic response but did not have a PCR result available.
At 60 months, the estimated risk of disease progression wassignificantly higher for the high-risk group of patients, accordingto the Sokal scoring system (P=0.002); the estimated rates forpatients in the high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk groupswere 17%, 8%, and 3%, respectively. However, the Sokal scorewas not associated with disease progression in patients whohad a complete cytogenetic response (95%, 95%, and 99% in thehigh-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk groups, respectively)(P=0.20 overall; P=0.92 for the comparison between the intermediate-riskgroup and the high-risk group, and P=0.16 for the comparisonbetween the low-risk group and the high-risk group).
The molecular responses at 12 and 18 months were also associatedwith long-term outcomes. At 60 months, the patients who hada complete cytogenetic response and a reduction of at least3 log in levels of BCR-ABL transcripts in bone marrow cellsafter 18 months of treatment had an estimated rate of survivalwithout progression of CML of 100%. In the group with a reductionof less than 3 log in levels of BCR-ABL transcripts, the estimatedrate was 98% (P=0.11). However, in the absence of a completecytogenetic response, the rate was 87% (P<0.001) (Figure 3B).No patient who had a complete cytogenetic response and reductionof at least 3 log in levels of Bcr-Abl transcripts at 12 monthshad progressed to the accelerated phase or blast crisis at 60months.
Overall Survival
By the cutoff date for this analysis, 57 patients (10%) whoreceived imatinib had died; 5 of these patients had switchedto interferon alfa plus cytarabine. The estimated overall survivalrate at 60 months was 89% (95% CI, 86 to 92) (Figure 4). Allogeneichematopoietic stem-cell transplantation was carried out in 44patients who discontinued imatinib: 11 had progressed to theaccelerated phase or blast crisis, 15 had had a hematologicor cytogenetic relapse, and 18 had stopped therapy for otherreasons (including safety and withdrawal of consent). Of the44 patients who underwent transplantation, 14 (32%) died. At60 months, with data censored at the time of transplantation,the estimated overall survival rate was 92% (95% CI, 89 to 95).After data were censored for patients who had died from causesunrelated to CML or transplantation, the overall estimated survivalrate was 95% (95% CI, 93 to 98) at 60 months (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Overall Survival among Patients Treated with Imatinib Based on an Intention-to-Treat Analysis.
The estimated overall survival rate at 60 months was 89%. After the censoring of data for patients who died from causes unrelated to CML or transplantation, the estimated overall survival was 95% at 60 months. At the time of analysis, 57 patients had died. The number of patients with events and the number of patients available for analysis are shown.
Discussion
The initial analysis of this study, performed at a median follow-upof 19 months, showed a high rate of response and an acceptablerate of side effects of imatinib as initial therapy for newlydiagnosed chronic-phase CML.14 The present analysis, with amedian follow-up of 60 months, showed an estimated relapse rateof 17% at 60 months, and an estimated 7% of all patients progressedto the accelerated phase or blast crisis. The 5-year estimatedoverall survival rate for patients who received imatinib asinitial therapy (89%) is higher than that reported in any previouslypublished prospective study of the treatment of CML.17
This trial allowed patients to cross over to the alternate treatment,and most patients in the interferon group either switched toimatinib or discontinued interferon. On the basis of an intention-to-treatanalysis, there was no significant difference in overall survivalbetween the group of patients who began their treatment withinterferon and those who began their treatment with imatinib(data not shown). Previous randomized studies of interferonalfa plus cytarabine, performed before the availability of imatinib,showed a 5-year overall survival of 68 to 70%.12,13 With theuse of historical comparisons, a survival advantage for initialtherapy with imatinib over interferon alfa can be demonstrated.18
In a landmark analysis, 97% of patients with a complete cytogeneticresponse within 12 months after starting imatinib did not progressto the accelerated phase or blast crisis by 60 months. Notably,patients who were deemed to be at high risk on the basis ofSokal scores had a lower rate of complete cytogenetic response(69%) than did patients who were at low risk or intermediaterisk (89% and 82%, respectively). However, the risk of relapsein patients who had a cytogenetic response was not associatedwith the Sokal score. With interferon treatment, by contrast,the Sokal score was important even among patients with a completecytogenetic response.19
Remarkably, no patient who had a complete cytogenetic responseand a reduction in levels of BCR-ABL transcripts of at least3 log at 12 or 18 months after starting imatinib had progressionof CML by 60 months. Only 2% of patients who had a completecytogenetic response and a reduction in levels of BCR-ABL transcriptsof less than 3 log at 18 months had progressed to the acceleratedphase or blast crisis at 60 months.
It is currently recommended that imatinib therapy be continuedindefinitely. Anecdotal reports suggest that the discontinuationof imatinib, even in patients with undectectable levels of BCR-ABLtranscripts, results in relapse.20,21,22,23,24 Although it isnot known why imatinib is not able to eradicate the malignantclone, potential mechanisms include drug efflux25 and amplificationor mutation of the BCR-ABL gene.26 It is also possible thatimatinib cannot completely inhibit BCR-ABL kinase activity;low levels of activity would allow cells to survive but notproliferate. As an alternative, the malignant clone could persistthrough mechanisms that are independent of the BCR-ABL kinase.27
Initial studies of two new inhibitors of the BCR-ABL kinasethat are more potent than imatinib dasatinib and nilotinib showed high response rates in patients who had had arelapse during imatinib therapy.28,29 Despite their potency,these inhibitors cannot eradicate all CML cells in vitro.30As was the case in patients in our study, it is assumed thatin patients receiving these drugs a durable response can beachieved even without disease eradication if there is a reductionin levels of BCR-ABL transcripts of at least 3 log.
Notably, the rate of disease progression in patients in ourstudy is apparently trending downward, although the trend hasnot reached statistical significance. If it persists, such atrend would be consistent with the findings that mutations inthe BCR-ABL gene are the major cause of relapse in patientstreated with imatinib.31 If we presume that mutations precedeimatinib therapy (as the data suggest),32,33 the emergence ofresistance to the drug would depend on the size of the mutantclone at the start of therapy and its doubling time. Since mostmutated and unmutated BCR-ABL clones have similar doubling times,34a patient with a mutant clone should be at highest risk forrelapse during the first several years of therapy. This predictionis in line with the apparent downward trend in the risk of diseaseprogression observed in our study.
Dr. Druker's institution is the site of clinical trials sponsoredby Novartis, but neither he nor his laboratory reports receivingfunds from Novartis. Dr. Guilhot reports receiving consultingand lecture fees from Novartis; Dr. O'Brien, consulting feesfrom Novartis and Bristol-Myers Squibb and lecture fees fromNovartis; Ms. Gathmann, being an employee of and having equityownership in Novartis; Dr. Kantarjian, consulting fees fromNovartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and MGI Pharma; Dr. Gattermann,consulting and lecture fees from Novartis and Pharmion; Dr.Deininger, consulting and lecture fees from Novartis and Bristol-MyersSquibb; Dr. Silver, consulting fees from Novartis; Dr. Goldman,lecture fees from Novartis; Dr. Stone, consulting and lecturefees and grant support from Novartis and Bristol-Myers Squibb;Dr. Cervantes, consulting fees from Novartis and lecture feesfrom Novartis and Bristol-Myers Squibb; Dr. Hochhaus, consultingand lecture fees from Novartis and Bristol-Myers Squibb; Dr.Powell, lecture fees from Pharmion; Dr. Gabrilove, consultingfees from Novartis; Dr. Rousselot, lecture fees from NovartisOncology; Dr. Cornelissen, consulting fees from Novartis Oncology;Dr. Hughes, consulting and lecture fees from Novartis; Dr. Fischer,consulting fees from LymphoSign and Novartis and lecture feesfrom Novartis; Dr. Saglio, consulting and lecture fees fromNovartis; Dr. Gratwohl, consulting fees from Novartis, Pfizer,and Amgen and lecture fees from Novartis; Dr. Radich, consultingfees from Novartis and Bristol-Myers Squibb and lecture feesfrom Novartis; Dr. Simonsson, consulting fees from Novartisand Bristol-Myers Squibb; Dr. Taylor, consulting fees from Amgen,Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Celgene and lecture feesfrom Novartis; Dr. Baccarani, consulting fees from Novartis,Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Pfizer and lecture fees fromNovartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Schering, and Pfizer; Dr. So,being an employee of Novartis and having equity ownership inNovartis and Pfizer; Dr. Letvak, being an employee of and havingequity ownership in Novartis; and Dr. Larson, consulting andlecture fees from Novartis. No other potential conflict of interestrelevant to this article was reported.
We thank the coinvestigators; the members of the medical, nursing,and research staff at the trial centers; the clinical trialmonitors and the data managers and programmers at Novartis fortheir contributions; and Tillman Krahnke and Manisha Mone fortheir invaluable collaboration.
* Authors' affiliations and investigators in the InternationalRandomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS) are listedin the Appendix.
Source Information
Address reprint requests to Dr. Druker at the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, L592, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97239, or at drukerb{at}ohsu.edu.
References
Nowell PC, Hungerford DA. A minute chromosome in human chronic granulocytic leukemia. Science 1960;132:1497-1497.
Rowley JD. A new consistent abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukaemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa staining. Nature 1973;243:290-293. [CrossRef][Medline]
Heisterkamp N, Stam K, Groffen J, de Klein A, Grosveld G. Structural organization of the bcr gene and its role in the Ph' translocation. Nature 1985;315:758-761. [CrossRef][Medline]
Konopka JB, Watanabe SM, Witte ON. An alteration of the human c-abl protein in K562 leukemia cells unmasks associated tyrosine kinase activity. Cell 1984;37:1035-1042. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Shtivelman E, Lifshitz B, Gale RP, Canaani E. Fused transcript of abl and bcr genes in chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Nature 1985;315:550-554. [CrossRef][Medline]
Druker BJ, Tamura S, Buchdunger E, et al. Effects of a selective inhibitor of the ABL tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr-Abl positive cells. Nat Med 1996;2:561-566. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Druker BJ, Sawyers CL, Kantarjian H, et al. Activity of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1038-1042. [Erratum, N Engl J Med 2001;345:232.] [Free Full Text]
Druker BJ, Talpaz M, Resta DJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1031-1037. [Free Full Text]
Kantarjian H, Sawyers C, Hochhaus A, et al. Hematologic and cytogenetic responses to imatinib mesylate in chronic myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med 2002;346:645-652. [Erratum, N Engl J Med 2002;346:1923.] [Free Full Text]
Sawyers CL, Hochhaus A, Feldman E, et al. Imatinib induces hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast crisis: results of a phase II study. Blood 2002;99:3530-3539. [Free Full Text]
Talpaz M, Silver RT, Druker BJ, et al. Imatinib induces durable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a phase 2 study. Blood 2002;99:1928-1937. [Free Full Text]
Baccarani M, Rosti G, de Vivo A, et al. A randomized study of interferon-alpha versus interferon-alpha and low-dose arabinosyl cytosine in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2002;99:1527-1535. [Free Full Text]
Guilhot F, Chastang C, Michallet M, et al. Interferon alfa-2B combined with cytarabine versus interferon alone in chronic myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med 1997;337:223-229. [Free Full Text]
O'Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA, et al. Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003;348:994-1004. [Free Full Text]
Hughes TP, Kaeda J, Branford S, et al. Frequency of major molecular responses to imatinib or interferon alfa plus cytarabine in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1423-1432. [Free Full Text]
Sokal JE, Cox EB, Baccarani M, et al. Prognostic discrimination in "good-risk" chronic granulocytic leukemia. Blood 1984;63:789-799. [Free Full Text]
Silver RT, Woolf SH, Hehlmann R, et al. An evidence-based analysis of the effect of busulfan, hydroxyurea, interferon, and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in treating the chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia: developed for the American Society of Hematology. Blood 1999;94:1517-1536. [Free Full Text]
Roy L, Guilhot J, Krahnke T, et al. Survival advantage from imatinib compared with the combination interferon-alpha plus cytarabine in chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia: historical comparison between two phase 3 trials. Blood 2006;108:1478-1484. [Free Full Text]
Bonifazi F, de Vivo A, Rosti G, et al. Chronic myeloid leukemia and interferon-alpha: a study of complete cytogenetic responders. Blood 2001;98:3074-3081. [Free Full Text]
Rousselot P, Huguet F, Rea D, et al. Imatinib mesylate discontinuation in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in complete molecular remission for more than two years. Blood (in press).
Breccia M, Diverio D, Pane F, et al. Discontinuation of imatinib therapy after achievement of complete molecular response in a Ph+ CML patient treated while in long lasting complete cytogenetic remission (CCR) induced by interferon. Leuk Res 2006;30:1577-1579. [CrossRef][Medline]
Mauro MJ, Druker BJ, Maziarz RT. Divergent clinical outcome in two CML patients who discontinued imatinib therapy after achieving a molecular remission. Leuk Res 2004;28:Suppl 1:S71-S73. [Medline]
Merante S, Orlandi E, Bernasconi P, Calatroni S, Boni M, Lazzarino M. Outcome of four patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib mesylate discontinuation. Haematologica 2005;90:979-981. [Free Full Text]
Cortes J, O'Brien S, Kantarjian H. Discontinuation of imatinib therapy after achieving a molecular response. Blood 2004;104:2204-2205. [Free Full Text]
Thomas J, Wang L, Clark RE, Pirmohamed M. Active transport of imatinib into and out of cells: implications for drug resistance. Blood 2004;104:3739-3745. [Free Full Text]
Chu S, Xu H, Shah NP, et al. Detection of BCR-ABL kinase mutations in CD34+ cells from chronic myelogenous leukemia patients in complete cytogenetic remission on imatinib mesylate treatment. Blood 2005;105:2093-2098. [Free Full Text]
Graham SM, Jorgensen HG, Allan E, et al. Primitive, quiescent, Philadelphia-positive stem cells from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia are insensitive to STI571 in vitro. Blood 2002;99:319-325. [Free Full Text]
Talpaz M, Shah NP, Kantarjian H, et al. Dasatinib in imatinib-resistant Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2531-2541. [Free Full Text]
Kantarjian H, Giles F, Wunderle L, et al. Nilotinib in imatinib-resistant CML and Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2542-2551. [Free Full Text]
Copland M, Hamilton A, Elrick LJ, et al. Dasatinib (BMS-354825) targets an earlier progenitor population than imatinib in primary CML but does not eliminate the quiescent fraction. Blood 2006;107:4532-4539. [Free Full Text]
Shah NP, Sawyers CL. Mechanisms of resistance to STI571 in Philadelphia chromosome-associated leukemias. Oncogene 2003;22:7389-7395. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Willis SG, Lange T, Demehri S, et al. High-sensitivity detection of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations in imatinib-naive patients: correlation with clonal cytogenetic evolution but not response to therapy. Blood 2005;106:2128-2137. [Free Full Text]
Roche-Lestienne C, Preudhomme C. Mutations in the ABL kinase domain pre-exist the onset of imatinib treatment. Semin Hematol 2003;40:Suppl 2:80-82. [Web of Science][Medline]
Griswold IJ, MacPartlin M, Bumm T, et al. Kinase domain mutants of Bcr-Abl exhibit altered transformation potency, kinase activity, and substrate utilization, irrespective of sensitivity to imatinib. Mol Cell Biol 2006;26:6082-6093. [Free Full Text]
Appendix
From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute,Portland (B.J.D.); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Poitiers,France (F.G.); University of Newcastle, Newcastle, United Kingdom(S.G.O.); Novartis, Basel, Switzerland (I.G.); M.D. AndersonCancer Center, Houston (H.K.); Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf,Germany (N.G.); Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany (M.W.N.D.);WeillCornell Medical Center, New York (R.T.S.); NationalHeart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD (J.M.G.); DanaFarberCancer Institute, Boston (R.M.S.); Hospital Clinic I Provincial,Barcelona (F.C.); University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany(A.H.); Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem,NC (B.L.P.); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York (J.L.G.);Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris (P.R.); Centre HospitalierUniversitaire de Bordeaux, Pessac, France (J.R.); Erasmus MedicalCenter, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (J.J.C.); Royal AdelaideHospital, Adelaide, Australia (T.H.); Universitätsklinikfür Innere Medizin I, Vienna (H.A.); Johannes GutenbergUniversität, Mainz, Germany (T.F.); University HospitalGasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (G.V.); Vancouver Hospital, Vancouver,BC, Canada (J.S.); Azienda Ospedaliera S. Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano,Italy (G.S.); University Hospital Basel, Switzerland (A.G.);Aarhus Amtssygehus, Aarhus, Denmark (J.L.N.); Fred HutchinsonCancer Research Center, Seattle (J.P.R.); Akademiska Sjukhuset,Uppsala, Sweden (B.S.); Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Australia(K.T.); Policlinico S. OrsolaMalpighi, Bologna, Italy(M.B.); Novartis, Florham Park, NJ (C.S., L.L.); and Universityof Chicago, Chicago (R.A.L.).
The following investigators participated in IRIS: Australia Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston: S. Durrant; MonashMedical Centre, Melbourne: A. Schwarer; Sir Charles GairdnerHospital, Perth: D. Joske; Australian Leukemia and LymphomaGroup, Melbourne: J. Seymour; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville:A. Grigg; St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst: D. Ma; RoyalNorth Shore Hospital, St. Leonards: C. Arthur; Westmead Hospital,Westmead: K. Bradstock; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney:D. Joshua. Belgium A.Z. Sint-Jan, Brugge: A. Louwagie;Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels: P. Martiat; Cliniques Universitaires,Yvoir: A. Bosly. Canada McGill University, Montreal:C. Shustik; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto: J. Lipton;Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS: D. Forrest;McMaster University Medical Centre, West Hamilton, ON: I. Walker;Université de Montréal, Montreal: D.-C. Roy; CancerCareManitoba, Winnipeg: M. Rubinger; Ottawa Hospital Regional CancerCentre, Ottawa: I. Bence-Bruckler; University of Calgary andTom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB: D. Stewart; London RegionalCancer Centre, London, ON: M. Kovacs; Cross Cancer Center, Edmonton,AB: A.R. Turner. Denmark Kobenhavns Amts Sygehus i Gentofte,Hellerup: H. Birgens; Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciencesand University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen: O. Bjerrum.France Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille: T. Facon;Hôtel Dieu Hospital, Nantes: J.-L. Harousseau; Henri MondorHospital, Creteil: M. Tulliez; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire(CHU) Brabois, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy: A. Guerci; Institut Paoli-Calmettes,Marseille: D. Blaise; Hopital Civil, Strasbourg: F. Maloisel;CHU la Milétrie, Poitiers: M. Michallet. Germany University of Regensburg, Regensburg: R. Andreesen; KrankenhausMuenchen Schwabing, Munich: C. Nerl; UniversitätsklinikumRostock, Rostock: M. Freund; Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf:N. Gattermann; Carl-Gustav Carus Universität, Dresden:G. Ehninger; Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig: M. Deininger;Medizinische Klinik III, Frankfurt: O. Ottmann; Clinical CenterRechts der Isar, Munich: C. Peschel; University of Heidelberg,Heidelberg: S. Fruehauf; Philipps-Universität Marburg,Baldingerstraße, Marburg: A. Neubauer; Humboldt Universität,Berlin: P. Le Coutre; Robert Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart: W. Aulitzky.Italy University Hospital, Udine: R. Fanin; San OrsolaHospital, Bologna: G. Rosti; Università La Sapienza,Rome: F. Mandelli; Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico(IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia: M. Lazzarino; NiguardaCa' Granda Hospital, Milan: E. Morra; Azienda Ospedaliera eCliniche Universitarie San Martino, Largo R Benzi, Genoa: A.Carella; University of Pisa, Pisa: M. Petrini; Azienda OspedalieraBianchi-Malacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria: F. Nobile; Universityof Bari, Policlinico, Bari: V. Liso; Cardarelli Hospital, Naples:F. Ferrara; University of Parma, Parma: V. Rizzoli; OspedaleCivile, Pescara: G. Fioritoni; Institute of Hematology and MedicalOncology Seragnoli, Bologna: G. Martinelli. the Netherlands Vrije Universiteit Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam:G. Ossenkoppele. New Zealand University of Auckland,Auckland: P. Browett. Norway Medisinsk Avdeling, Rikshospitalet,Oslo: T. Gedde-Dahl; Ullevål Sykehus, Oslo: J.-M. Tangen;Hvidovre Hospital, Betalende: I. Dahl. Spain HospitalClinic, Villarroel, Barcelona: J. Odriozola; University of Barcelona,Barcelona: J.C. Hernández Boluda; Hospital Universitariode la Princesa, Madrid: J.L. Steegman; Hospital Universitariode Salamanca, Salamanca: C. Cañizo; San Carlos ClinicalHospital, Madrid: J. Diaz; Institut Català d'Oncología,Barcelona: A. Granena; Hospital Lluis Alcanyis, Cta Xativa-Silla:M.N. Fernández. Sweden Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm:L. Stenke; Huddinge Sjukhus, Huddinge: C. Paul; MedicinklinikenUniversitetssjukhuset, Örebro: M. Bjoreman; Regionsjukhuset,Linköping: C. Malm; Sahlgrenska Hospital, Göteborg:H. Wadenvik; Endokrinsekt/Medklin Universitetssjukhuset, Lund:P.-G. Nilsson; Universitetssjukhuset Malmo University Hospital,Malmo: I. Turesson. Switzerland Kantonsspital, St. Gallen:U. Hess; University of Bern, Bern: M. Solenthaler. United Kingdom University of Nottingham and Nottingham City Hospital,Nottingham: N. Russell; Kings College, London: G. Mufti; St.George's Hospital, Medical School, London: J. Cavenagh; RoyalLiverpool University Hospital, Liverpool: R.E. Clark; CambridgeInstitute for Medical Research, Cambridge: A.R. Green; GlasgowRoyal Infirmary, Glasgow: T.L. Holyoake; Manchester Royal Infirmary,Manchester: G.S. Lucas; Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds: G. Smith;Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham: D.W. Milligan;Derriford Hospital, Plymouth: S.J. Rule; University Hospitalof Wales, Cardiff: A.K. Burnett; United States WaltDisney Memorial Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL: R. Moroose; RoswellPark Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY: M. Wetzler; Gibbs Cancer Center,Spartanburg, SC: J. Bearden; Ohio State University School ofMedicine, Columbus: S. Cataland; University of New Mexico HealthSciences Center, Albuquerque: I. Rabinowitz; University of MarylandCancer Center, Baltimore: B. Meisenberg; Montgomery Cancer Center,Montgomery, AL: K. Thompson; State University of New York UpstateMedical Center, Syracuse: S. Graziano; University of Alabamaat Birmingham, Birmingham: P. Emanuel; Hematology and Oncology,Inc., Dayton, OH: H. Gross; Billings Oncology Associates, Billings,MT: P. Cobb; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA:R. Bhatia; Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita: S. Dakhil; AltaBates Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berkeley, CA: D. Irwin; CancerResearch Center of Hawaii, Honolulu: B. Issell; University ofNebraska Medical Center, Omaha: S. Pavletic; Columbus CommunityClinical Oncology Program, Columbus, OH: P. Kuebler; MichiganState University Hematology/Oncology, Lansing: E. Layhe; BrownUniversity School of Medicine, Providence, RI: P. Butera; LoyolaUniversity Medical Center, Shreveport, LA: J. Glass; Duke UniversityMedical Center, Durham, NC: J. Moore; University of Vermont,Burlington: B. Grant; University of Tennessee, Memphis: H. Niell;University of Louisville Hospital, Louisville, KY: R. Herzig;Sarah Cannon Cancer Center, Nashville: H. Burris; Universityof Minnesota, Minneapolis: B. Peterson; Cleveland Clinic Foundation,Cleveland: M. Kalaycio; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center,Seattle: D. Stirewalt; University of Utah, Salt Lake City: W.Samlowski; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York:E. Berman; University of North Carolina School of Medicine,Charlotte: S. Limentani; Atlanta Cancer Center, Atlanta: T.Seay; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, ChapelHill: T. Shea; Indiana Blood and Marrow Institute, Beech Grove:L. Akard; San Juan Regional Cancer Center, Farmington, NM: G.Smith; University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center,Worcester: P. Becker; Washington University School of Medicine,St. Louis: S. Devine; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee:R. Hart; Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans:R. Veith; Decatur Memorial Hospital, Decatur, IL: J. Wade; RockyMountain Cancer Centers, Denver: M. Brunvand; Oncology-HematologyGroup of South Florida, Miami: L. Kalman; Memphis Cancer Center,Memphis, TN: D. Strickland; Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit: M.Shurafa; University of California, San Diego, Medical Center,La Jolla: A. Bashey; Western Pennsylvania Cancer Institute,Pittsburgh: R. Shadduck; Tulane Cancer Center, New Orleans:H. Safah; Southbay Oncology Hematology Partners, Campbell, CA:M. Rubenstein; University of Texas Southwest Medical Center,Dallas: R. Collins; Cancer Care Associates, Tulsa, OK: A. Keller;Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago: M. Tallman;Northern New Jersey Cancer Center, Hackensack: A. Pecora; Universityof Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh:M. Agha; Texas Oncology, Dallas: H. Holmes; and New Mexico OncologyHematology Consultants, Albuquerque: R. Guidice. Study ManagementCommittee: Oregon Health and Science University Cancer InstituteResearch and Patient Care, Portland: B.J. Druker; UniversityHospital, Poitier, France: F. Guilhot; University of Chicago,Chicago: R.A. Larson; University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastleupon Tyne, UK: S.G. O'Brien. Independent Data Monitoring Board:Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel: J. Rowe; Wayne State University,Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit: C.A. Schiffer;International Drug Development Institute, Brussels: M. Buyse.Protocol Working Group: Policlinico San OrsolaMalpighi,Bologna, Italy: M. Baccarani; Hospital Clinic, Barcelona: F.Cervantes; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands:J. Cornelissen; Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz,Germany: T. Fischer; Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim,Germany: A. Hochhaus; Hanson Institute Centre for Cancer, Adelaide,Australia: T. Hughes; Medical University of Vienna, Vienna:K. Lechner; Aarhus Amtssygehus, Aarhus, Denmark: J.L. Nielsen;CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France: J. Reiffers; HôpitalSaint Louis, Paris: P. Rousselot; San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital,Turin, Italy: G. Saglio; Vancouver Hospital, Vancouver, BC,Canada: J. Shepherd; Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden:B. Simonsson; University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland: A. Gratwohl;Imperial College, London: J.M. Goldman; University of MichiganHealth System, Ann Arbor: M. Talpaz; Mater Misericordiae PublicHospital, Brisbane, Australia: K. Taylor; and University HospitalGasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium: G. Verhoef.
Hassoun, P. M., Mouthon, L., Barbera, J. A., Eddahibi, S., Flores, S. C., Grimminger, F., Jones, P. L., Maitland, M. L., Michelakis, E. D., Morrell, N. W., Newman, J. H., Rabinovitch, M., Schermuly, R., Stenmark, K. R., Voelkel, N. F., Yuan, J. X.-J., Humbert, M.
(2009). Inflammation, Growth Factors, and Pulmonary Vascular Remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol
54: S10-S19
[Abstract][Full Text]
Quintas-Cardama, A., Kantarjian, H., Jones, D., Shan, J., Borthakur, G., Thomas, D., Kornblau, S., O'Brien, S., Cortes, J.
(2009). Delayed achievement of cytogenetic and molecular response is associated with increased risk of progression among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase receiving high-dose or standard-dose imatinib therapy. Blood
113: 6315-6321
[Abstract][Full Text]
Li, X., He, Y., Ruiz, C. H., Koenig, M., Cameron, M. D.
(2009). Characterization of Dasatinib and Its Structural Analogs as CYP3A4 Mechanism-Based Inactivators and the Proposed Bioactivation Pathways. Drug Metab. Dispos.
37: 1242-1250
[Abstract][Full Text]
Eley, T., Luo, F. R., Agrawal, S., Sanil, A., Manning, J., Li, T., Blackwood-Chirchir, A., Bertz, R.
(2009). Phase I Study of the Effect of Gastric Acid pH Modulators on the Bioavailability of Oral Dasatinib in Healthy Subjects. J Clin Pharmacol
49: 700-709
[Abstract][Full Text]
Dorr, D. A., Burdon, R., West, D. P., Lagman, J., Georgopoulos, C., Belknap, S. M., McKoy, J. M., Djulbegovic, B., Edwards, B. J., Weitzman, S. A., Boyle, S., Tallman, M. S., Talpaz, M., Sartor, O., Bennett, C. L.
(2009). Quality of Reporting of Serious Adverse Drug Events to an Institutional Review Board: A Case Study with the Novel Cancer Agent, Imatinib Mesylate. Clin. Cancer Res.
15: 3850-3855
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tyner, J. W., Deininger, M. W., Loriaux, M. M., Chang, B. H., Gotlib, J. R., Willis, S. G., Erickson, H., Kovacsovics, T., O'Hare, T., Heinrich, M. C., Druker, B. J.
(2009). RNAi screen for rapid therapeutic target identification in leukemia patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
106: 8695-8700
[Abstract][Full Text]
Fava, C., Kantarjian, H. M., Jabbour, E., O'Brien, S., Jain, N., Rios, M. B., Garcia-Manero, G., Ravandi, F., Verstovsek, S., Borthakur, G., Shan, J., Cortes, J.
(2009). Failure to achieve a complete hematologic response at the time of a major cytogenetic response with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors is associated with a poor prognosis among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated or blast phase. Blood
113: 5058-5063
[Abstract][Full Text]
Baccarani, M., Rosti, G., Castagnetti, F., Haznedaroglu, I., Porkka, K., Abruzzese, E., Alimena, G., Ehrencrona, H., Hjorth-Hansen, H., Kairisto, V., Levato, L., Martinelli, G., Nagler, A., Lanng Nielsen, J., Ozbek, U., Palandri, F., Palmieri, F., Pane, F., Rege-Cambrin, G., Russo, D., Specchia, G., Testoni, N., Weiss-Bjerrum, O., Saglio, G., Simonsson, B.
(2009). Comparison of imatinib 400 mg and 800 mg daily in the front-line treatment of high-risk, Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia: a European LeukemiaNet Study. Blood
113: 4497-4504
[Abstract][Full Text]
Baccarani, M., Dreyling, M., On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group,
(2009). Chronic myelogenous leukemia: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol
20: iv105-iv107
[Full Text]
Castagnetti, F., Palandri, F., Amabile, M., Testoni, N., Luatti, S., Soverini, S., Iacobucci, I., Breccia, M., Rege Cambrin, G., Stagno, F., Specchia, G., Galieni, P., Iuliano, F., Pane, F., Saglio, G., Alimena, G., Martinelli, G., Baccarani, M., Rosti, G., for the GIMEMA CML Working Party,
(2009). Results of high-dose imatinib mesylate in intermediate Sokal risk chronic myeloid leukemia patients in early chronic phase: a phase 2 trial of the GIMEMA CML Working Party. Blood
113: 3428-3434
[Abstract][Full Text]
Arora, M., Weisdorf, D. J., Spellman, S. R., Haagenson, M. D., Klein, J. P., Hurley, C. K., Selby, G. B., Antin, J. H., Kernan, N. A., Kollman, C., Nademanee, A., McGlave, P., Horowitz, M. M., Petersdorf, E. W.
(2009). HLA-Identical Sibling Compared With 8/8 Matched and Mismatched Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow Transplant for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. JCO
27: 1644-1652
[Abstract][Full Text]
Abrahamsson, A. E., Geron, I., Gotlib, J., Dao, K.-H. T., Barroga, C. F., Newton, I. G., Giles, F. J., Durocher, J., Creusot, R. S., Karimi, M., Jones, C., Zehnder, J. L., Keating, A., Negrin, R. S., Weissman, I. L., Jamieson, C. H. M.
(2009). Glycogen synthase kinase 3{beta} missplicing contributes to leukemia stem cell generation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
106: 3925-3929
[Abstract][Full Text]
Jabbour, E., Kantarjian, H. M., Jones, D., Shan, J., O'Brien, S., Reddy, N., Wierda, W. G., Faderl, S., Garcia-Manero, G., Verstovsek, S., Rios, M. B., Cortes, J.
(2009). Imatinib mesylate dose escalation is associated with durable responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after cytogenetic failure on standard-dose imatinib therapy. Blood
113: 2154-2160
[Abstract][Full Text]
Daniels, J. M. A., Vonk-Noordegraaf, A., Janssen, J. J. W. M., Postmus, P. E., van Altena, R.
(2009). Tuberculosis complicating imatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukaemia. Eur Respir J
33: 670-672
[Abstract][Full Text]
Wong, S.-F.
(2009). Dasatinib dosing strategies in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia. J Oncol Pharm Pract
15: 17-27
[Abstract]
Li, Z., Beutel, G., Rhein, M., Meyer, J., Koenecke, C., Neumann, T., Yang, M., Krauter, J., von Neuhoff, N., Heuser, M., Diedrich, H., Gohring, G., Wilkens, L., Schlegelberger, B., Ganser, A., Baum, C.
(2009). High-affinity neurotrophin receptors and ligands promote leukemogenesis. Blood
113: 2028-2037
[Abstract][Full Text]
Palandri, F., Iacobucci, I., Soverini, S., Castagnetti, F., Poerio, A., Testoni, N., Alimena, G., Breccia, M., Rege-Cambrin, G., Tiribelli, M., Varaldo, R., Abruzzese, E., Martino, B., Luciano, L., Pane, F., Saglio, G., Martinelli, G., Baccarani, M., Rosti, G.
(2009). Treatment of Philadelphia-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with Imatinib: Importance of a Stable Molecular Response. Clin. Cancer Res.
15: 1059-1063
[Abstract][Full Text]
Jabbour, E., Cortes, J. E., Kantarjian, H. M.
(2009). Suboptimal Response to or Failure of Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: What Is the Optimal Strategy?. Mayo Clin Proc.
84: 161-169
[Abstract][Full Text]
Yong, A. S. M., Keyvanfar, K., Hensel, N., Eniafe, R., Savani, B. N., Berg, M., Lundqvist, A., Adams, S., Sloand, E. M., Goldman, J. M., Childs, R., Barrett, A. J.
(2009). Primitive quiescent CD34+ cells in chronic myeloid leukemia are targeted by in vitro expanded natural killer cells, which are functionally enhanced by bortezomib. Blood
113: 875-882
[Abstract][Full Text]
Redaelli, S., Piazza, R., Rostagno, R., Magistroni, V., Perini, P., Marega, M., Gambacorti-Passerini, C., Boschelli, F.
(2009). Activity of Bosutinib, Dasatinib, and Nilotinib Against 18 Imatinib-Resistant BCR/ABL Mutants. JCO
27: 469-471
[Full Text]
Goldman, J. M.
(2009). Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells: Now on the Run. JCO
27: 313-314
[Full Text]
Bixby, D., Talpaz, M.
(2009). Imatinib As Frontline Therapy for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic-phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book
2009: 395-401
[Abstract][Full Text]
Distler, J. H. W., Distler, O.
(2009). Imatinib as a novel therapeutic approach for fibrotic disorders. Rheumatology (Oxford)
48: 2-4
[Full Text]
O'Hare, T., Deininger, M. W.
(2008). Toward a Cure For Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res.
14: 7971-7974
[Full Text]
Druker, B. J.
(2008). Translation of the Philadelphia chromosome into therapy for CML. Blood
112: 4808-4817
[Abstract][Full Text]
Louvet, C., Szot, G. L., Lang, J., Lee, M. R., Martinier, N., Bollag, G., Zhu, S., Weiss, A., Bluestone, J. A.
(2008). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors reverse type 1 diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 18895-18900
[Abstract][Full Text]
Konig, H., Copland, M., Chu, S., Jove, R., Holyoake, T. L., Bhatia, R.
(2008). Effects of Dasatinib on Src Kinase Activity and Downstream Intracellular Signaling in Primitive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Hematopoietic Cells. Cancer Res.
68: 9624-9633
[Abstract][Full Text]
Marin, D., Milojkovic, D., Olavarria, E., Khorashad, J. S., de Lavallade, H., Reid, A. G., Foroni, L., Rezvani, K., Bua, M., Dazzi, F., Pavlu, J., Klammer, M., Kaeda, J. S., Goldman, J. M., Apperley, J. F.
(2008). European LeukemiaNet criteria for failure or suboptimal response reliably identify patients with CML in early chronic phase treated with imatinib whose eventual outcome is poor. Blood
112: 4437-4444
[Abstract][Full Text]
Williams, R.T., Sherr, C.J.
(2008). The INK4-ARF (CDKN2A/B) Locus in Hematopoiesis and BCR-ABL-induced Leukemias. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol
0: sqb.2008.73.039v2-sqb.2008.73.039
[Abstract]
Minami, Y., Stuart, S. A., Ikawa, T., Jiang, Y., Banno, A., Hunton, I. C., Young, D. J., Naoe, T., Murre, C., Jamieson, C. H. M., Wang, J. Y. J.
(2008). BCR-ABL-transformed GMP as myeloid leukemic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 17967-17972
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hasford, J., Lauseker, M., Gathmann, I., Pfirrmann, M., Larson, R. A., Guilhot, F., O'Brien, S. G, Druker, B. J., Hehlmann, R., Hochhaus, A., For the IRIS Study Group, , For the German CML Study Group,
(2008). Favorable Outcome of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Imatinib Vs Early Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.. ASH ANNUAL MEETING ABSTRACTS
112: 2123-2123
[Abstract]
Hughes, T. P., Branford, S., White, D. L., Reynolds, J., Koelmeyer, R., Seymour, J. F., Taylor, K., Arthur, C., Schwarer, A., Morton, J., Cooney, J., Leahy, M. F., Rowlings, P., Catalano, J., Hertzberg, M., Filshie, R., Mills, A. K., Fay, K., Durrant, S., Januszewicz, H., Joske, D., Underhill, C., Dunkley, S., Lynch, K., Grigg, A., on behalf of the Australasian Leukaemia and Lympho,
(2008). Impact of early dose intensity on cytogenetic and molecular responses in chronic- phase CML patients receiving 600 mg/day of imatinib as initial therapy. Blood
112: 3965-3973
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lozano, E, Segarra, M, Garcia-Martinez, A, Hernandez-Rodriguez, J, Cid, M C
(2008). Imatinib mesylate inhibits in vitro and ex vivo biological responses related to vascular occlusion in giant cell arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis
67: 1581-1588
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lee, S. J., Kukreja, M., Wang, T., Giralt, S. A., Szer, J., Arora, M., Woolfrey, A. E., Cervantes, F., Champlin, R. E., Gale, R. P., Halter, J., Keating, A., Marks, D. I., McCarthy, P. L., Olavarria, E., Stadtmauer, E. A., Abecasis, M., Gupta, V., Khoury, H. J., George, B., Hale, G. A., Liesveld, J. L., Rizzieri, D. A., Antin, J. H., Bolwell, B. J., Carabasi, M. H., Copelan, E., Ilhan, O., Litzow, M. R., Schouten, H. C., Zander, A. R., Horowitz, M. M., Maziarz, R. T.
(2008). Impact of prior imatinib mesylate on the outcome of hematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood
112: 3500-3507
[Abstract][Full Text]
Giannoudis, A., Davies, A., Lucas, C. M., Harris, R. J., Pirmohamed, M., Clark, R. E.
(2008). Effective dasatinib uptake may occur without human organic cation transporter 1 (hOCT1): implications for the treatment of imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood
112: 3348-3354
[Abstract][Full Text]
Khorashad, J. S., de Lavallade, H., Apperley, J. F., Milojkovic, D., Reid, A. G., Bua, M., Szydlo, R., Olavarria, E., Kaeda, J., Goldman, J. M., Marin, D.
(2008). Finding of Kinase Domain Mutations in Patients With Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Responding to Imatinib May Identify Those at High Risk of Disease Progression. JCO
26: 4806-4813
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bewry, N. N., Nair, R. R., Emmons, M. F., Boulware, D., Pinilla-Ibarz, J., Hazlehurst, L. A.
(2008). Stat3 contributes to resistance toward BCR-ABL inhibitors in a bone marrow microenvironment model of drug resistance. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
7: 3169-3175
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cristofanilli, M., Morandi, P., Krishnamurthy, S., Reuben, J. M., Lee, B.-N., Francis, D., Booser, D. J., Green, M. C., Arun, B. K., Pusztai, L., Lopez, A., Islam, R., Valero, V., Hortobagyi, G. N.
(2008). Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec(R)) in advanced breast cancer-expressing C-Kit or PDGFR-{beta}: clinical activity and biological correlations. Ann Oncol
19: 1713-1719
[Abstract][Full Text]
Okabe, S., Tauchi, T., Ohyashiki, K.
(2008). Characteristics of Dasatinib- and Imatinib-Resistant Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Cells. Clin. Cancer Res.
14: 6181-6186
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tefferi, A.
(2008). The Need for Adequate Coverage of Oncology Topics in Internal Medicine Journals. Mayo Clin Proc.
83: 980-982
[Full Text]
Dulucq, S., Bouchet, S., Turcq, B., Lippert, E., Etienne, G., Reiffers, J., Molimard, M., Krajinovic, M., Mahon, F.-X.
(2008). Multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) polymorphisms are associated with major molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood
112: 2024-2027
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hoffmann, K. M., Moser, A., Lohse, P., Winkler, A., Binder, B., Sovinz, P., Lackner, H., Schwinger, W., Benesch, M., Urban, C.
(2008). Successful treatment of progressive cutaneous mastocytosis with imatinib in a 2-year-old boy carrying a somatic KIT mutation. Blood
112: 1655-1657
[Abstract][Full Text]
Quintarelli, C., Dotti, G., De Angelis, B., Hoyos, V., Mims, M., Luciano, L., Heslop, H. E., Rooney, C. M., Pane, F., Savoldo, B.
(2008). Cytotoxic T lymphocytes directed to the preferentially expressed antigen of melanoma (PRAME) target chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood
112: 1876-1885
[Abstract][Full Text]
Frohling, S., Dohner, H.
(2008). Chromosomal Abnormalities in Cancer. NEJM
359: 722-734
[Full Text]
Tam, C. S., Kantarjian, H., Garcia-Manero, G., Borthakur, G., O'Brien, S., Ravandi, F., Shan, J., Cortes, J.
(2008). Failure to achieve a major cytogenetic response by 12 months defines inadequate response in patients receiving nilotinib or dasatinib as second or subsequent line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood
112: 516-518
[Abstract][Full Text]
Dai, Y., Chen, S., Venditti, C. A., Pei, X.-Y., Nguyen, T. K., Dent, P., Grant, S.
(2008). Vorinostat synergistically potentiates MK-0457 lethality in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells sensitive and resistant to imatinib mesylate. Blood
112: 793-804
[Abstract][Full Text]
Quintas-Cardama, A., Cortes, J.
(2008). Therapeutic Options Against BCR-ABL1 T315I-Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res.
14: 4392-4399
[Abstract][Full Text]
de Lavallade, H., Apperley, J. F., Khorashad, J. S., Milojkovic, D., Reid, A. G., Bua, M., Szydlo, R., Olavarria, E., Kaeda, J., Goldman, J. M., Marin, D.
(2008). Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Incidence of Sustained Responses in an Intention-to-Treat Analysis. JCO
26: 3358-3363
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cortes, J. E.
(2008). Imatinib Therapy for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Where Do We Go Now?. JCO
26: 3308-3309
[Full Text]
Vajpai, N., Strauss, A., Fendrich, G., Cowan-Jacob, S. W., Manley, P. W., Grzesiek, S., Jahnke, W.
(2008). Solution Conformations and Dynamics of ABL Kinase-Inhibitor Complexes Determined by NMR Substantiate the Different Binding Modes of Imatinib/Nilotinib and Dasatinib. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 18292-18302
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hiwase, D. K., Saunders, V., Hewett, D., Frede, A., Zrim, S., Dang, P., Eadie, L., To, L. B., Melo, J., Kumar, S., Hughes, T. P., White, D. L.
(2008). Dasatinib Cellular Uptake and Efflux in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Cells: Therapeutic Implications. Clin. Cancer Res.
14: 3881-3888
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hexner, E. O., Serdikoff, C., Jan, M., Swider, C. R., Robinson, C., Yang, S., Angeles, T., Emerson, S. G., Carroll, M., Ruggeri, B., Dobrzanski, P.
(2008). Lestaurtinib (CEP701) is a JAK2 inhibitor that suppresses JAK2/STAT5 signaling and the proliferation of primary erythroid cells from patients with myeloproliferative disorders. Blood
111: 5663-5671
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kavalerchik, E., Goff, D., Jamieson, C. H.M.
(2008). Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells. JCO
26: 2911-2915
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mullighan, C. G., Williams, R. T., Downing, J. R., Sherr, C. J.
(2008). Failure of CDKN2A/B (INK4A/B-ARF)-mediated tumor suppression and resistance to targeted therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia induced by BCR-ABL. Genes Dev.
22: 1411-1415
[Abstract][Full Text]
Heaney, N. B., Copland, M., Stewart, K., Godden, J., Parker, A. N., McQuaker, I. G., Smith, G. M., Crawley, C., Shepherd, P., Holyoake, T. L.
(2008). Complete molecular responses are achieved after reduced intensity stem cell transplantation and donor lymphocyte infusion in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood
111: 5252-5255
[Abstract][Full Text]
Puttini, M., Redaelli, S., Moretti, L., Brussolo, S., Gunby, R. H, Mologni, L., Marchesi, E., Cleris, L., Donella-Deana, A., Drueckes, P., Sala, E., Lucchini, V., Kubbutat, M., Formelli, F., Zambon, A., Scapozza, L., Gambacorti-Passerini, C.
(2008). Characterization of compound 584, an Abl kinase inhibitor with lasting effects. haematol
93: 653-661
[Abstract][Full Text]
Palandri, F., Iacobucci, I., Castagnetti, F., Testoni, N., Poerio, A., Amabile, M., Breccia, M., Intermesoli, T., Iuliano, F., Rege-Cambrin, G., Tiribelli, M., Miglino, M., Pane, F., Saglio, G., Martinelli, G., Rosti, G., Baccarani, M., on behalf of the GIMEMA Working Party on CML,
(2008). Front-line treatment of Philadelphia positive chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib and interferon-{alpha}: 5-year outcome. haematol
93: 770-774
[Abstract][Full Text]
Larson, R. A., Druker, B. J., Guilhot, F., O'Brien, S. G., Riviere, G. J., Krahnke, T., Gathmann, I., Wang, Y., for the IRIS (International Randomized Interferon,
(2008). Imatinib pharmacokinetics and its correlation with response and safety in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a subanalysis of the IRIS study. Blood
111: 4022-4028
[Abstract][Full Text]
O'Hare, T., Eide, C. A., Tyner, J. W., Corbin, A. S., Wong, M. J., Buchanan, S., Holme, K., Jessen, K. A., Tang, C., Lewis, H. A., Romero, R. D., Burley, S. K., Deininger, M. W.
(2008). SGX393 inhibits the CML mutant Bcr-AblT315I and preempts in vitro resistance when combined with nilotinib or dasatinib. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 5507-5512
[Abstract][Full Text]
Holland, J. F.
(2008). Breaking the Cure Barrier 25 Years Later. JCO
26: 1575-1575
[Full Text]
Kenealy, L. K., Christenson, C. B., Williams, C. B.
(2008). Current Therapies for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Journal of Pharmacy Practice
21: 116-125
[Abstract]
Ramirez, P., DiPersio, J. F.
(2008). Therapy Options in Imatinib Failures. The Oncologist
13: 424-434
[Abstract][Full Text]
Harb, J. G., Chyla, B. I., Huettner, C. S.
(2008). Loss of Bcl-x in Ph+ B-ALL increases cellular proliferation and does not inhibit leukemogenesis. Blood
111: 3760-3769
[Abstract][Full Text]
Wu, J., Meng, F., Lu, H., Kong, L., Bornmann, W., Peng, Z., Talpaz, M., Donato, N. J.
(2008). Lyn regulates BCR-ABL and Gab2 tyrosine phosphorylation and c-Cbl protein stability in imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells. Blood
111: 3821-3829
[Abstract][Full Text]
Laudadio, J., Deininger, M. W.N., Mauro, M. J., Druker, B. J., Press, R. D.
(2008). An Intron-Derived Insertion/Truncation Mutation in the BCR-ABL Kinase Domain in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing Kinase Inhibitor Therapy. J. Mol. Diagn.
10: 177-180
[Abstract][Full Text]
Deenik, W., van der Holt, B., Verhoef, G. E. G., Smit, W. M., Kersten, M. J., Kluin-Nelemans, H. C., Verdonck, L. F., Ferrant, A., Schattenberg, A. V. M. B., Janssen, J. J. W. M., Sonneveld, P., van Marwijk Kooy, M., Wittebol, S., Willemze, R., Wijermans, P. W., Westveer, P. H. M., Beverloo, H. B., Valk, P., Lowenberg, B., Ossenkoppele, G. J., Cornelissen, J. J.
(2008). Dose-finding study of imatinib in combination with intravenous cytarabine: feasibility in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood
111: 2581-2588
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tyner, J. W., Walters, D. K., Willis, S. G., Luttropp, M., Oost, J., Loriaux, M., Erickson, H., Corbin, A. S., O'Hare, T., Heinrich, M. C., Deininger, M. W., Druker, B. J.
(2008). RNAi screening of the tyrosine kinome identifies therapeutic targets in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood
111: 2238-2245
[Abstract][Full Text]
le Coutre, P., Ottmann, O. G., Giles, F., Kim, D.-W., Cortes, J., Gattermann, N., Apperley, J. F., Larson, R. A., Abruzzese, E., O'Brien, S. G., Kuliczkowski, K., Hochhaus, A., Mahon, F.-X., Saglio, G., Gobbi, M., Kwong, Y.-L., Baccarani, M., Hughes, T., Martinelli, G., Radich, J. P., Zheng, M., Shou, Y., Kantarjian, H.
(2008). Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant accelerated-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood
111: 1834-1839
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kantarjian, H., Schiffer, C., Jones, D., Cortes, J.
(2008). Monitoring the response and course of chronic myeloid leukemia in the modern era of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors: practical advice on the use and interpretation of monitoring methods. Blood
111: 1774-1780
[Full Text]
Konig, H., Holyoake, T. L., Bhatia, R.
(2008). Effective and selective inhibition of chronic myeloid leukemia primitive hematopoietic progenitors by the dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor SKI-606. Blood
111: 2329-2338
[Abstract][Full Text]
Takeuchi, E. E., Alison, D. L.
(2008). What's new in oncology: targeted therapy. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain
8: 36-38
[Full Text]
Baccarani, M., Pane, F., Saglio, G.
(2008). Monitoring treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. haematol
93: 161-169
[Full Text]
Lundan, T., Juvonen, V., Mueller, M. C., Mustjoki, S., Lakkala, T., Kairisto, V., Hochhaus, A., Knuutila, S., Porkka, K.
(2008). Comparison of bone marrow high mitotic index metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization to peripheral blood and bone marrow real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction on the International Scale for detecting residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia. haematol
93: 178-185
[Abstract][Full Text]
Marshall, H. M, Hammond, J. M
(2008). Treatment Options in Imatinib-Resistant Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
42: 259-264
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mesa, R. A.
(2008). Not too late for imatinib. Blood
111: 973-974
[Full Text]
Hochhaus, A., Druker, B., Sawyers, C., Guilhot, F., Schiffer, C. A., Cortes, J., Niederwieser, D. W., Gambacorti-Passerini, C., Stone, R. M., Goldman, J., Fischer, T., O'Brien, S. G., Reiffers, J. J., Mone, M., Krahnke, T., Talpaz, M., Kantarjian, H. M.
(2008). Favorable long-term follow-up results over 6 years for response, survival, and safety with imatinib mesylate therapy in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of interferon-{alpha} treatment. Blood
111: 1039-1043
[Abstract][Full Text]
Palandri, F., Iacobucci, I., Martinelli, G., Amabile, M., Poerio, A., Testoni, N., Soverini, S., Castagnetti, F., De Vivo, A., Breccia, M., Specchia, G., Abruzzese, E., Martino, B., Cilloni, D., Saglio, G., Pane, F., Liberati, A. M., Rosti, G., Baccarani, M.
(2008). Long-Term Outcome of Complete Cytogenetic Responders After Imatinib 400 mg in Late Chronic Phase, Philadelphia-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: The GIMEMA Working Party on CML. JCO
26: 106-111
[Abstract][Full Text]
Jamieson, C. H.
(2008). Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells. ASH Education Book
2008: 436-442
[Abstract][Full Text]
Saglio, G., Pane, F., Martinelli, G.
(2008). State-of-the-art Monitoring for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book
2008: 313-317
[Abstract][Full Text]
Deininger, M. W.N.
(2008). Imatinib Resistance and the Difficulty of Eradicating Leukemia Stem Cells. Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book
2008: 318-323
[Abstract][Full Text]
McLaughlin, J., Cheng, D., Singer, O., Lukacs, R. U., Radu, C. G., Verma, I. M., Witte, O. N.
(2007). Sustained suppression of Bcr-Abl-driven lymphoid leukemia by microRNA mimics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
104: 20501-20506
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hehlmann, R., Gratwohl, A., Pfirrmann, M., Hasford, J., Hochhaus, A., Hossfeld, D. K., Heimpel, H.
(2007). Response: Drug treatment and allografting as first-line therapy in young patients with CML. Blood
110: 4618-4619
[Full Text]
Sessions, J.
(2007). Chronic myeloid leukemia in 2007. Am J Health Syst Pharm
64: S4-S9
[Abstract][Full Text]
Fausel, C.
(2007). Targeted chronic myeloid leukemia therapy: Seeking a cure. Am J Health Syst Pharm
64: S9-S15
[Abstract][Full Text]
Olavarria, E., Siddique, S., Griffiths, M. J., Avery, S., Byrne, J. L., Piper, K. P., Lennard, A. L., Pallan, L., Arrazi, J. M., Perz, J. B., O'Shea, D., Goldman, J. M., Apperley, J. F., Craddock, C. F.
(2007). Posttransplantation imatinib as a strategy to postpone the requirement for immunotherapy in patients undergoing reduced-intensity allografts for chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood
110: 4614-4617
[Abstract][Full Text]
Schnipper, L. E.
(2007). Update in Oncology. ANN INTERN MED
147: 775-782
[Full Text]
Gratwohl, A., Baldomero, H., Schwendener, A., Gratwohl, M., Apperley, J., Niederwieser, D., Frauendorfer, K., for the Joint Accreditation Committee of the Inter,
(2007). Predictability of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation rates. haematol
92: 1679-1686
[Abstract][Full Text]
de Kogel, C. E., Schellens, J. H. M.
(2007). Imatinib. The Oncologist
12: 1390-1394
[Full Text]
White, D. L., Saunders, V. A., Dang, P., Engler, J., Venables, A., Zrim, S., Zannettino, A., Lynch, K., Manley, P. W., Hughes, T.
(2007). Most CML patients who have a suboptimal response to imatinib have low OCT-1 activity: higher doses of imatinib may overcome the negative impact of low OCT-1 activity. Blood
110: 4064-4072
[Abstract][Full Text]
Chase, A., Grand, F. H., Cross, N. C. P.
(2007). Activity of TKI258 against primary cells and cell lines with FGFR1 fusion genes associated with the 8p11 myeloproliferative syndrome. Blood
110: 3729-3734
[Abstract][Full Text]
Klion, A. D., Robyn, J., Maric, I., Fu, W., Schmid, L., Lemery, S., Noel, P., Law, M. A., Hartsell, M., Talar-Williams, C., Fay, M. P., Dunbar, C. E., Nutman, T. B.
(2007). Relapse following discontinuation of imatinib mesylate therapy for FIP1L1/PDGFRA-positive chronic eosinophilic leukemia: implications for optimal dosing. Blood
110: 3552-3556
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kantarjian, H. M., Giles, F., Gattermann, N., Bhalla, K., Alimena, G., Palandri, F., Ossenkoppele, G. J., Nicolini, F.-E., O'Brien, S. G., Litzow, M., Bhatia, R., Cervantes, F., Haque, A., Shou, Y., Resta, D. J., Weitzman, A., Hochhaus, A., le Coutre, P.
(2007). Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective in patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase following imatinib resistance and intolerance. Blood
110: 3540-3546
[Abstract][Full Text]
Palandri, F., Iacobucci, I., Quarantelli, F., Castagnetti, F., Cilloni, D., Baccarani, M., on behalf of the GIMEMA Working Party on CML,
(2007). Long-term molecular responses to imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: comparison between complete cytogenetic responders treated in early and in late chronic phase. haematol
92: 1579-1580
[Abstract][Full Text]