The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 357:470-476 August 2, 2007 Number 5
NextNext

Prevalence of Rheumatic Heart Disease Detected by Echocardiographic Screening
Eloi Marijon, M.D., Phalla Ou, M.D., David S. Celermajer, Ph.D., F.R.A.C.P., Beatriz Ferreira, M.D., Ph.D., Ana Olga Mocumbi, M.D., Dinesh Jani, M.D., Christophe Paquet, M.D., M.P.H., Sophie Jacob, Ph.D., Daniel Sidi, M.D., Ph.D., and Xavier Jouven, M.D., Ph.D.

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-CME Exam

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Carapetis, J. R.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Epidemiologic studies of the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease have used clinical screening with echocardiographic confirmation of suspected cases. We hypothesized that echocardiographic screening of all surveyed children would show a significantly higher prevalence of rheumatic heart disease.

Methods Randomly selected schoolchildren from 6 through 17 years of age in Cambodia and Mozambique were screened for rheumatic heart disease according to standard clinical and echocardiographic criteria.

Results Clinical examination detected rheumatic heart disease that was confirmed by echocardiography in 8 of 3677 children in Cambodia and 5 of 2170 children in Mozambique; the corresponding prevalence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 2.2 cases per 1000 (95% CI, 0.7 to 3.7) for Cambodia and 2.3 cases per 1000 (95% CI, 0.3 to 4.3) for Mozambique. In contrast, echocardiographic screening detected 79 cases of rheumatic heart disease in Cambodia and 66 cases in Mozambique, corresponding to prevalence rates of 21.5 cases per 1000 (95% CI, 16.8 to 26.2) and 30.4 cases per 1000 (95% CI, 23.2 to 37.6), respectively. The mitral valve was involved in the great majority of cases (87.3% in Cambodia and 98.4% in Mozambique).

Conclusions Systematic screening with echocardiography, as compared with clinical screening, reveals a much higher prevalence of rheumatic heart disease (approximately 10 times as great). Since rheumatic heart disease frequently has devastating clinical consequences and secondary prevention may be effective after accurate identification of early cases, these results have important public health implications.


In poor and developing nations, rheumatic heart disease remains a major cause of morbidity and premature death and imposes a substantial burden on health care systems with limited budgets.1,2 Nevertheless, primary and secondary prevention efforts may be highly effective.1,3 Secondary prevention relies on accurate case detection for the appropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics and regular medical surveillance. Exact prevalence data are also highly desirable to facilitate health care planning.

Almost all population-based epidemiologic surveys have relied on careful clinical examination of school-age children, with confirmation of clinically suspected cases by echocardiography. Such surveys show current prevalence rates of rheumatic heart disease of approximately 1 to 5 cases per 1000 among school-age children in developing countries, with the highest rates in sub-Saharan Africa.2

Cardiac ultrasonography is known to be more sensitive than auscultation for the detection of pathologic valve disease,4 and the recent availability of high-quality portable ultrasound equipment makes it possible to screen large numbers of children at schools in developing nations. Furthermore, the 2004 World Health Organization Expert Consultation Report states that echocardiographically diagnosed, clinically silent rheumatic valve involvement should be managed as rheumatic heart disease until proved otherwise.3 We therefore hypothesized that comprehensive screening, including echocardiography in all children, might reveal a higher prevalence of cases than clinical examination with echocardiographic confirmation of clinically suspected cases only.

We performed two large, population-based studies of school-age children, one in Southeast Asia (Cambodia) and one in sub-Saharan Africa (Mozambique), to assess the feasibility of echocardiographic screening and to ascertain whether this method would yield a more realistic estimate of the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease than that obtained by screening with the use of predominantly clinical criteria.

Methods

Setting and Survey Methods

Our study was conducted in Cambodia and Mozambique, because these countries are representative of two regions of the developing world where previous surveys have documented an apparently high prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in school-age children2 and because local investigators and authorities were willing and able to participate in the studies. The two studies were carried out after prospective planning by a central group of investigators, which included establishing protocols for prospectively defined clinical and echocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of rheumatic valvular abnormalities.

The first study was carried out in Cambodia in 2001 and 2002 after approval by the Ministry of Health. The investigators approached the directors of randomly selected schools in the capital of Phnom Penh, and all agreed to participate. All children in each school were invited to participate; those children whose parents or guardians gave oral informed consent were brought to the Phnom Penh Heart Center, where they underwent comprehensive clinical and echocardiographic examination (with a Philips Sonos 4500 4–7 MHz transducer) for signs of rheumatic heart disease. Images were recorded on super-VHS videotape for later review by an independent physician who was experienced in diagnosing rheumatic heart disease and was not aware of the clinical findings. The results of this study appeared to confirm our hypothesis that a much higher prevalence of rheumatic heart disease would be found with echocardiographic screening. We then decided to repeat the study with more rigorous randomization procedures for subject selection and with confirmation of echocardiographic findings by multiple independent observers.

We conducted a survey in Mozambique from May through October 2005 after approval of the survey by the ethics committee of the Ministry of Health and the Education Ministry. A total of 2170 pupils from six public primary schools were randomly selected from among the 1,140,000 children 6 through 17 years of age living in the capital city of Maputo. The overall sample was equally distributed among seven class levels, with 310 subjects per class level, in order to ensure an even age distribution. Two thirds of the children (1440) were from suburban schools and one third (730) were from urban schools. For each class level, classrooms were selected by means of a systematic randomization procedure with Epi Info software (version 3.3.2). In each selected classroom, all children for whom written informed consent could be obtained from a parent or guardian (91.6% of children) were included in the study.

For each child, any history of acute rheumatic fever was noted. The participating children then underwent a detailed clinical and echocardiographic examination (with a SonoSite 4.2 MHz transducer) at the school. Absentees were noted and revisits were made to examine all of them. All children in whom cardiac abnormalities were noted with the portable ultrasound system underwent repeated scanning at the Maputo Heart Institute (with a Philips Sonos 4500 4–7 MHz transducer). These images were recorded on super-VHS videotape for later analysis by three independent physicians experienced in diagnosing rheumatic heart disease.

In both studies, children with a diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever according to the revised Jones criteria were treated with salicylates and antibiotic agents.5 Each child in whom rheumatic valve lesions were detected by echocardiography was followed up with medical surveillance every 6 months, including clinical and echocardiographic review, initiation of antibiotic prophylaxis in cases of lesions considered to be significant according to World Health Organization criteria, and surgical treatment where clinically indicated.

Clinical and Echocardiographic Definitions

Clinical examination was performed by physicians experienced in the diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease. Careful cardiac auscultation was performed with the patient in the supine and left lateral decubitus positions. Children in whom an organic murmur was detected clinically and the presence of rheumatic heart disease was confirmed echocardiographically were classified as having clinically detected rheumatic heart disease.

The echocardiographic criteria were agreed on by all observers in both the Cambodian and the Mozambique studies before the ultrasound scans were read by echocardiographers who were unaware of the clinical findings. Only left-sided valves were examined for features of rheumatic heart disease; mild tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary regurgitation were frequently noted but were not regarded as indicating rheumatic heart disease. Rheumatic heart disease was defined by the presence of any definite evidence of mitral- or aortic-valve regurgitation seen in two planes by Doppler echocardiography, accompanied by at least two of the following three morphologic abnormalities of the regurgitant valve: restricted leaflet mobility, focal or generalized valvular thickening, and abnormal subvalvular thickening. For a definite diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease, these features had to be identified concordantly by each of the echocardiographers, all of whom were experienced in the diagnosis and treatment of rheumatic heart disease.

Statistical Analysis

Each study enrolled more than 2000 children and had more than 90% power at the 0.01 significance level to test the hypothesis that echocardiographic screening would reveal twice as many cases of rheumatic heart disease as would be expected on the basis of published prevalence data from clinical screening studies (5 cases per 1000 children).2 Our sample-size calculation was based on the results of previous studies of the clinical prevalence of rheumatic heart disease; since the prevalence observed in our studies was higher than expected, our sample sizes clearly were overestimated.

All data were analyzed at INSERM, Unit 780 Avenir, Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Villejuif, France, with SAS software (version 8.2). Descriptive data are presented as means ±SD; sample means were compared with an independent-samples Student's t-test. A two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. We calculated the fraction of children whose findings were normal by clinical criteria and abnormal by echocardiographic criteria. In addition, the rate of detection by echocardiographic screening was calculated by means of the total probability formula as follows: rate of detection = p1 + (1 – p1) x p2, where p1 is the probability of an abnormal result by clinical screening and p2 is the probability of an abnormal result by echocardiographic screening after a normal result by clinical screening.

Results

Cambodia

Of the 3677 children examined in Cambodia, 52.0% were male, and the mean age was 11.7±2.5 years (Table 1). Clinical evidence of rheumatic heart disease confirmed by echocardiography was found in 8 children, corresponding to a prevalence of 2.2 cases per 1000 children (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 3.7). Five of these eight children fulfilled the revised Jones criteria for acute rheumatic fever and were treated.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Get Slide
 
Table 1. Characteristics of the Patients.

 
Echocardiographic screening showed that 79 children had Doppler evidence of left-heart valve regurgitation and morphologic features of rheumatic heart disease, corresponding to a prevalence of 21.5 cases per 1000 children (95% CI, 16.8 to 26.2) (Figure 1). Thus, 71 children were found by echocardiography to have clinically silent rheumatic heart disease. Of the 79 children with a diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease, 61 (77.2%) had only mitral-valve disease, 8 had both aortic- and mitral-valve disease, and 10 had only aortic-valve disease. No cases of valvular stenosis were detected.

Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Get Slide
 
Figure 1. Prevalence of Rheumatic Valvular Abnormalities among Schoolchildren in Cambodia and Mozambique as Detected by Clinical Screening with Echocardiographic Confirmation and by Echocardiographic Screening.

The I bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.

 
Mozambique

Of the 2170 children examined in Mozambique, 47.5% were male, and the mean age was 10.6±2.5 years. Three children had a history of acute rheumatic fever but had no cardiac murmur on examination, one child had known rheumatic heart disease, and one had known congenital heart disease. Clinical evidence of rheumatic heart disease confirmed by echocardiography was found in 5 children, corresponding to a prevalence of 2.3 cases per 1000 (95% CI, 0.3 to 4.3). Two of these five children fulfilled the revised Jones criteria for acute rheumatic fever and were treated.

Echocardiographic screening showed that 124 children (5.7%) had Doppler evidence of left-heart valve regurgitation. Sixty-six of these children were concordantly confirmed by the three independent experts to have valvular rheumatic damage, corresponding to a prevalence of 30.4 cases per 1000 (95% CI, 23.2 to 37.6) (Figure 1). Of these 66 children, 63 (95.5%) had only mitral-valve disease, 2 had both aortic- and mitral-valve disease, and 1 had only aortic-valve disease (Figure 2). No cases of valvular stenosis were detected. A pairwise kappa test showed excellent agreement among the three observers.

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Get Slide
 
Figure 2. Outcome of Echocardiographic Screening for Rheumatic Heart Disease in Mozambique.

Definitive echocardiography was performed to identify rheumatic heart disease, defined by the presence of any definite evidence of mitral- or aortic-valve regurgitation seen in two planes on Doppler echocardiography, accompanied by at least two of the following three morphologic abnormalities of the regurgitant valve: restricted leaflet mobility, focal or generalized valvular thickening, and abnormal subvalvular thickening.

 
Of the 456 children with a detected cardiac murmur, 91 were suspected to have organic lesions at auscultation, but only 10 of them had cardiac lesions confirmed by echocardiography (5 had valvular lesions associated with rheumatic heart disease, and 5 had congenital heart lesions). The prevalence of echocardiographically diagnosed rheumatic heart disease was higher in girls than in boys (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.8; P=0.04) and in suburban than in urban children (P=0.04). The prevalence of subclinical rheumatic heart disease increased with age from 2.4% in the lowest tercile (9 years or less) to 4.1% in the highest tercile (12 years or more) (P=0.04).

By applying the observed prevalence in our sample of 2170 children to the whole population of children 6 through 17 years of age in Maputo (1,140,000), we estimate that 2622 cases of rheumatic heart disease would be detected by clinical screening as compared with 34,656 cases that would be detected by echocardiographic screening.

Discussion

Although there is little doubt that rheumatic heart disease remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in developing nations, recent reports of approximately 15 million cases in the developing world1,2 may underestimate the actual burden of this disease, because these estimates are based on prevalence data obtained by comprehensive clinical screening rather than echocardiographic screening. Our findings suggest that echocardiographic screening might detect approximately 10 times as many cases as clinical screening in school-age children in Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

Even echocardiographic screening of schoolchildren may underestimate the true prevalence of rheumatic heart disease, since the major risk factors for rheumatic fever include poverty, overcrowding, and poor access to medical services, all of which are probably associated with a reduced likelihood of attending school. Furthermore, the high prevalence rates we observed were for two populations of children with an average age of only 10 to 12 years, and community data from Australian aborigines suggest that the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease is much higher in children over 15 years of age.1,6

There are at least two pressing reasons to obtain accurate prevalence data on rheumatic valvular abnormalities in children: to guide regional health service planning and to accurately identify affected children to be targeted for secondary prevention. Although many cases of rheumatic valvular abnormalities in children may resolve spontaneously,7 many will progress to clinically manifested disease in young adulthood.1 Prophylactic antibiotic therapy and regular medical surveillance, if adequately administered, may be highly effective in preventing disease progression, even in children with subclinical disease.3

The field surveys reported here were planned and coordinated centrally from our institutions located in Paris, and the choice of countries for this project was based in part on our contacts in and knowledge of government and medical services in Cambodia and Mozambique. The initially surprising findings in Cambodia prompted us to undertake a similar study in Mozambique, with more rigorous protocols for randomized selection of schools and children, as well as protocols for follow-up of subjects, to assess the generalizability of our findings. Although environmental factors, genetic predisposition, specific virulence factors of group A streptococcus serotypes, management of antibiotic prophylaxis, and access to preventive care may all affect prevalence rates in specific areas, there is no reason to believe that our findings, which were remarkably similar in these two locations, would be valid only in the countries studied. We believe that this pattern is likely to be replicated elsewhere, while acknowledging that this question may require considerably more investigation.

Among more than 100 cross-sectional school surveys of rheumatic heart disease reported to date, we are aware of only one that included echocardiography of all surveyed children.8 In this study, which was conducted in Kenya, the prevalence of echocardiographically detected trivial mitral-valve regurgitation was 62 cases per 1000 and the prevalence of clinically detected rheumatic heart disease was 2.2 cases per 1000. Because these investigators did not present any data on valve morphology or the characteristics of the regurgitant jet, it was not clear whether the regurgitation was physiologic or was due to rheumatic or congenital disease. Indeed, many authors have emphasized the need to avoid overestimating the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease, which can result from inclusion of all cases of minor valve regurgitation, and to examine potentially affected valves for other structural or functional evidence of a rheumatic cause.4,9

There has been some debate concerning the echocardiographic signs of early rheumatic heart disease.4,9,10,11 Some groups have preferred an echocardiographic definition of rheumatic heart disease based on the length, velocity, and persistence of the regurgitant jet.3,12,13 However, these features may depend on the gain settings on the ultrasound equipment; thus, diagnosing subclinical rheumatic heart disease when Doppler criteria for abnormalities are also associated with morphologic valve changes would be expected to improve the specific diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease. In addition, the use of morphologic criteria combined with Doppler criteria for diagnosing rheumatic valve involvement may result in underdiagnosis of subclinical rheumatic heart disease, particularly in children who are screened soon after a first episode of acute rheumatic fever. Although portable ultrasound technology now makes it possible to perform most cardiac diagnostic assessments in schools, our findings support the need for a definitive cardiac ultrasound examination in suspected cases to avoid overdiagnosis.

Two recent reports have also advanced arguments in favor of echocardiographic screening in rheumatic heart disease prevalence studies. Meira and colleagues7 reported that in 34% of their patients with carditis, clinical examination after the acute phase showed normal findings, although progression to chronic subclinical valvular disease was confirmed by echocardiography in 82% of such cases. Furthermore, the latest report on rheumatic heart disease from the World Health Organization states that in areas where rheumatic heart disease is endemic, echocardiography may be used to diagnose "silent but significant rheumatic carditis of insidious onset" and recommends that such cases be managed as rheumatic heart disease until proved otherwise.3 Although echocardiographic criteria are still not included in the Jones criteria, this recommendation may represent a new step toward acknowledgment of subclinical lesions.

Even though portable echocardiographic equipment is now highly developed and accurate, echocardiographic screening may not be a practicable local solution for case identification under the current financial constraints on provision of diagnostic services in developing nations. Nevertheless, the observation that approximately 90% of cases of rheumatic heart disease in our study were clinically silent, occurring in asymptomatic children without audible murmurs, suggests that echocardiographic screening would be a desirable goal to optimize case identification and targeted (secondary) prevention measures. Funds for the purchase of the ultrasound equipment — the major expense of an ultrasound-based screening program for rheumatic heart disease — might be obtainable from charitable organizations. Our results might encourage a strategy of echocardiography-based screening programs for rheumatic heart disease, involving education and both primary and secondary prophylaxis, and based on accurate assessment of the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease.14

In summary, we have documented a much higher prevalence of rheumatic valvular abnormalities in school-age children than was previously suspected in both Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Comprehensive echocardiographic screening identified approximately 10 times as many children with rheumatic heart disease as were identified by the traditional strategy of clinical screening with echocardiographic confirmation. Because rheumatic heart disease remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in developing nations, these data have potentially important implications for case finding, delivery of effective primary and secondary prevention, and adequate planning of health services.

Supported by grants from La Chaîne de l'Espoir, Paris, and Cadeia da Esperança, Coimbra, Portugal.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

We thank the participating staff at the Phnom Penh Heart Center and the Maputo Heart Institute for their contributions to the study, and P. Ducimetière, J.P. Empana, and A. Kane at INSERM, Unité 780 Avenir, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, for their technical assistance.


Source Information

From the Departments of Pediatric Cardiology (E.M., D.S.) and Pediatric Radiology (P.O.), Hôpital Necker–Enfants Malades, Paris; the University Paris Descartes, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris (E.M., X.J.); the Maputo Heart Institute, Maputo, Mozambique (E.M., B.F., A.O.M., D.J.); the Phnom Penh Heart Center, Phnom Penh, Cambodia (P.O.); the Department of Medicine, Sydney University, Sydney (D.S.C.); the National Institute for Public Health Surveillance, Saint Maurice, France (C.P.); and INSERM, Unité 780 Avenir, Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Villejuif, France (S.J., X.J.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Marijon at the Hôpital Europeén Georges Pompidou, Service de Cardiologie 2, 20 rue Leblanc, 75908 Paris CEDEX 15, France, or at eloi_marijon{at}yahoo.fr.

References

  1. Carapetis JR, McDonald M, Wilson NJ. Acute rheumatic fever. Lancet 2005;366:155-168. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  2. Carapetis JR, Steer AC, Mulholland EK, Weber M. The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. Lancet Infect Dis 2005;5:685-694. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: report of a WHO Expert Consultation, Geneva, 29 October–1 November 2001. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
  4. Veasy LG. Time to take soundings in acute rheumatic fever. Lancet 2001;357:1994-1995. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Special Writing Group of the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young of the American Heart Association. Guidelines for the diagnosis of rheumatic fever: Jones Criteria, 1992 update. JAMA 1992;268:2069-2073. [Erratum, JAMA 1993;269:476.] [Abstract]
  6. Carapetis JR, Currie BJ, Mathews JD. Cumulative incidence of rheumatic fever in an endemic region: a guide to the susceptibility of the population? Epidemiol Infect 2000;124:239-244. [CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Meira ZM, Goulart EM, Colosimo EA, Mota CC. Long term follow up of rheumatic fever and predictors of severe rheumatic valvar disease in Brazilian children and adolescents. Heart 2005;91:1019-1022. [Free Full Text]
  8. Anabwani GM, Bonhoeffer P. Prevalence of heart disease in school children in rural Kenya using colour-flow echocardiography. East Afr Med J 1996;73:215-217. [ISI][Medline]
  9. Narula J, Kaplan EL. Echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic fever. Lancet 2001;358:2000-2000. [ISI][Medline]
  10. Vasan RS, Shrivastava S, Vijayakumar M, Narang R, Lister BC, Narula J. Echocardiographic evaluation of patients with acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic carditis. Circulation 1996;94:73-82. [Free Full Text]
  11. Figueroa FE, Fernandez MS, Valdes P, et al. Prospective comparison of clinical and echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic carditis: long term follow up of patients with subclinical disease. Heart 2001;85:407-410. [Free Full Text]
  12. Minich LL, Tani LY, Pagotto LT, Shaddy RE, Veasy LG. Doppler echocardiography distinguishes between physiologic and pathologic "silent" mitral regurgitation in patients with rheumatic fever. Clin Cardiol 1997;20:924-926. [ISI][Medline]
  13. Wilson NJ, Neutze JM. Echocardiographic diagnosis of subclinical carditis in acute rheumatic fever. Int J Cardiol 1995;50:1-6. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  14. McDonald M, Brown A, Noonan S, Carapetis JR. Preventing recurrent rheumatic fever: the role of register based programmes. Heart 2005;91:1131-1133. [Free Full Text]
Appendix

The principal investigators in this study were P. Ou in Cambodia and E. Marijon and B. Ferreira in Mozambique.


 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-CME Exam

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Carapetis, J. R.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

Rheumatic Heart Disease Detected by Echocardiographic Screening
Webb R., Wilson N. J., Lennon D., Marijon E., Celermajer D. S., Jouven X.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2007; 357:2088-2089, Nov 15, 2007. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.