The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 358:2218-2230 May 22, 2008 Number 21
NextNext

Bivalirudin during Primary PCI in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Gregg W. Stone, M.D., Bernhard Witzenbichler, M.D., Giulio Guagliumi, M.D., Jan Z. Peruga, M.D., Bruce R. Brodie, M.D., Dariusz Dudek, M.D., Ran Kornowski, M.D., Franz Hartmann, M.D., Bernard J. Gersh, M.B., Ch.B., D.Phil., Stuart J. Pocock, Ph.D., George Dangas, M.D., Ph.D., S. Chiu Wong, M.D., Ajay J. Kirtane, M.D., Helen Parise, Sc.D., Roxana Mehran, M.D., for the HORIZONS-AMI Trial Investigators

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-Supplementary Material

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Morrow, D. A.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Treatment with the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, results in similar suppression of ischemia while reducing hemorrhagic complications in patients with stable angina and non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The safety and efficacy of bivalirudin in high-risk patients are unknown.

Methods We randomly assigned 3602 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who presented within 12 hours after the onset of symptoms and who were undergoing primary PCI to treatment with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor or to treatment with bivalirudin alone. The two primary end points of the study were major bleeding and combined adverse clinical events, defined as the combination of major bleeding or major adverse cardiovascular events, including death, reinfarction, target-vessel revascularization for ischemia, and stroke (hereinafter referred to as net adverse clinical events) within 30 days.

Results Anticoagulation with bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, resulted in a reduced 30-day rate of net adverse clinical events (9.2% vs. 12.1%; relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 0.92; P=0.005), owing to a lower rate of major bleeding (4.9% vs. 8.3%; relative risk, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.77; P<0.001). There was an increased risk of acute stent thrombosis within 24 hours in the bivalirudin group, but no significant increase was present by 30 days. Treatment with bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, resulted in significantly lower 30-day rates of death from cardiac causes (1.8% vs. 2.9%; relative risk, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.95; P=0.03) and death from all causes (2.1% vs. 3.1%; relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.00; P=0.047).

Conclusions In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who are undergoing primary PCI, anticoagulation with bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, results in significantly reduced 30-day rates of major bleeding and net adverse clinical events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00433966 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .)


Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with evolving ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction decreases infarct size and the rates of recurrent ischemia, reinfarction, and stroke and improves survival, as compared with pharmacologic reperfusion therapy.1,2 Nonetheless, the prognosis after primary PCI has remained essentially unchanged over the past decade, with neither stents nor other novel devices or drugs improving survival beyond that achievable with balloon angioplasty alone.3,4,5,6,7,8 Treatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors may decrease the short- and long-term risk of death,9,10 and these agents are used in more than 90% of patients who undergo primary PCI in the United States and in the majority of such patients in Europe.11,12 Nonetheless, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications and thrombocytopenia,3,10,13,14,15 which have been strongly associated with early and late mortality.15,16,17,18,19

The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin (Angiomax, the Medicines Company), when used instead of heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, has been shown in large-scale, randomized trials to reduce major and minor bleeding and thrombocytopenia while resulting in similar rates of ischemia after PCI in patients with stable angina, those with unstable angina, and those with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.20,21,22,23 Whether bivalirudin is safe and effective for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who are undergoing primary PCI has not, to our knowledge, been studied. We therefore performed a large-scale study to evaluate the clinical value of bivalirudin in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Methods

Trial

The Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) study was a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial that compared bivalirudin alone with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who were undergoing primary PCI. The trial was designed by the principal investigator (Dr. Stone), executive committee, and pharmacology committee and was sponsored and managed by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, a nonprofit foundation affiliated with Columbia University (receiving funding from many commercial entities that make products for use in cardiovascular medicine, in addition to various other sources), with grant support from Boston Scientific and the Medicines Company. Other than supplying financial support and the drugs and devices, the funding companies were not involved with study processes, including site selection and management, data collection, and analysis. The principal investigator had unrestricted access to the data after the database was locked, controlled the decision to publish, prepared the manuscript, and vouches for the integrity and completeness of the trial report. No agreements exist regarding confidentiality of the data among the funding companies, the sponsor, and the investigators.

Patient Population

Consecutive patients 18 years of age or older who presented within 12 hours after the onset of symptoms and who had ST-segment elevation of 1 mm or more in two or more contiguous leads, new left bundle-branch block, or true posterior myocardial infarction were considered for enrollment. The principal exclusion criteria were contraindications to the study medications; prior administration of thrombolytic agents, bivalirudin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, low-molecular-weight heparin, or fondaparinux for the present admission (although prior unfractionated heparin was allowed); current use of warfarin; history of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, intracerebral mass, aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, or hemorrhagic stroke; stroke or transient ischemic attack within the previous 6 months or any permanent neurologic deficit; refusal to receive blood transfusions; gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the previous 2 months; major surgery within the previous 6 weeks; a known platelet count of less than 100,000 cells per cubic millimeter or a hemoglobin level of less than 10 g per deciliter, a planned elective surgical procedure that would necessitate an interruption in treatment with thienopyridines during the first 6 months after enrollment; coronary stent implantation within the previous 30 days; and noncardiac coexisting conditions that could limit life expectancy to less than 1 year or that might interfere with compliance with the protocol. The study was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at each participating center, and all patients gave written informed consent.

Study Protocol and Randomization

Patients were randomly assigned, in an open-label fashion and in a 1:1 ratio, to treatment with unfractionated heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (the control group) or to treatment with bivalirudin alone (Figure 1). Heparin was administered as an intravenous bolus of 60 IU per kilogram of body weight, with subsequent boluses targeted to an activated clotting time of 200 to 250 seconds. Bivalirudin was administered as an intravenous bolus of 0.75 mg per kilogram, followed by an infusion of 1.75 mg per kilogram per hour. If heparin was administered in a patient in the bivalirudin group, bivalirudin was started 30 minutes later but in all cases before PCI. Both antithrombin agents were discontinued, as specified by the protocol, at the completion of angiography or PCI but could be continued at low doses if they were clinically indicated. A glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor was administered before PCI in all the patients in the control group but was to be administered in the bivalirudin group only in patients with no reflow or with giant thrombus after PCI. Either abciximab (a bolus of 0.25 mg per kilogram followed by an infusion of 0.125 µg per kilogram per minute; maximum dose, 10 µg per minute) or double-bolus eptifibatide (a bolus of 180 µg per kilogram followed by an infusion of 2.0 µg per kilogram per minute, with a second bolus given 10 minutes after the first; no maximum dose prespecified), adjusted for renal impairment according to the label, was permitted at the discretion of the investigator and was continued for 12 hours (abciximab) or 12 to 18 hours (eptifibatide).

Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Get Slide
 
Figure 1. Randomization, Management Strategy, and Follow-up at 30 Days.

Two additional patients who did not give written consent were randomly assigned to bivalirudin, but the study drug was not administered and no data were collected for these patients. After coronary arteriography, a second round of randomization was performed, with eligible patients assigned to receive a paclitaxel-eluting stent or a bare-metal stent (not shown). Results of this randomization remain blinded. CABG denotes coronary-artery bypass grafting, GP glycoprotein, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, and STEMI ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

 
Aspirin (324 mg given orally or 500 mg administered intravenously) was given in the emergency room, after which 300 to 325 mg was given orally every day during the hospitalization, and 75 to 81 mg every day thereafter indefinitely. A loading dose of clopidogrel (either 300 mg or 600 mg, at the discretion of the investigator), or ticlopidine (500 mg), in the case of allergy to clopidogrel, was administered before catheterization, followed by 75 mg orally every day for at least 6 months (1 year or longer recommended).

Telephone randomization was performed with the use of a computerized, interactive voice-response system and a dynamic (minimization) allocation scheme that balanced the assignments for the administration of heparin before randomization; the administration of 300 mg or 600 mg of clopidogrel or 500 mg of ticlopidine before catheterization; planned administration of abciximab or eptifibatide for patients assigned to the control group; and the location of the study site (in the United States or outside the United States).

Emergency coronary angiography with left ventriculography was performed after randomization, followed by triage, at the discretion of the physician, to PCI, coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), or medical management, as described previously.3 After patency was restored in the infarct-related vessel, eligible patients were randomly assigned again, in a 3:1 ratio, to either paclitaxel-eluting stents (TAXUS Express,2 Boston Scientific) or uncoated, bare-metal stents that were identical in appearance (Express,2 Boston Scientific). The protocol specified that enrollment would continue until 3000 patients had been randomly assigned to a treatment group in this second part of the study. Clinical follow-up was performed at 30 days (±7 days), 6 months (±14 days), and 1 year (±14 days) and then yearly for a total of 5 years. Prespecified analyses of the primary end points were planned at 30 days for the first randomization (the pharmacologic component of the study) and at 1 year for the second randomization (the stent component). The results of the second randomization currently remain blinded, and the 30-day results reported here are based on pooled data for the stent groups. There were no significant interactions between stent type and the primary end points at 30 days in the pharmacologic component, according to an unblinded, independent statistical monitoring group.

Statistical Analysis

Two primary 30-day end points were prespecified: major bleeding (not related to coronary-artery bypass grafting) and combined adverse clinical events, defined as the combination of major bleeding or a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events, including death, reinfarction, target-vessel revascularization for ischemia, and stroke (hereinafter referred to as net adverse clinical events). Major bleeding was defined as intracranial or intraocular hemorrhage; bleeding at the access site, with a hematoma that was 5 cm or larger or that required intervention; a decrease in the hemoglobin level of 4 g per deciliter or more without an overt bleeding source or 3 g per deciliter or more with an overt bleeding source; reoperation for bleeding; or blood transfusion. Bleeding was also assessed and adjudicated on the basis of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) scales. Major adverse cardiovascular events have been defined previously.24 Death from cardiac causes was defined as death due to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation or pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, stroke, procedural complications, or any death for which a cardiac cause could not be ruled out. Death from noncardiac causes included bleeding-related death. Stent thrombosis was defined as the definite or probable occurrence of a stent-related thrombotic event according to the Academic Research Consortium classification.25 An independent clinical events committee that was unaware of the treatment assignments adjudicated all end-point events by reviewing the medical records.

The primary analyses were performed for all patients who underwent randomization, according to the intention-to-treat principle; secondary analyses were performed for the patients who underwent primary PCI. Sequential noninferiority and superiority analysis with hierarchical end-point testing for both primary end points was prespecified, with type I error controlled by the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure.26 Noninferiority tests were based on the upper boundary of the two-sided 95% confidence interval, with the use of binomial proportions. The noninferiority margins for major bleeding and net adverse clinical events were prespecified at 1% and 3.2%, respectively. A two-sided alpha level of 0.05 was used for superiority testing. Assuming true 30-day event rates for major bleeding and net adverse clinical events of 9% and 12%, respectively, in the control group and 6% and 9%, respectively, in the bivalirudin group, with 1700 patients in each group, the trial had 99% power to show the superiority of bivalirudin for reducing the rate of major bleeding and 80% power to show its superiority for reducing the rate of net adverse clinical events.

Categorical outcomes were compared by means of the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared by means of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. In addition to the primary analysis, which was based on binomial proportions, time-to-event outcomes, determined with Kaplan–Meier methods, were compared by means of the log-rank test.

Results

Patients and Procedures

Between March 25, 2005, and May 7, 2007, a total of 3602 patients, at 123 centers in 11 countries, who had ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and were undergoing primary PCI were randomly assigned to treatment with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (1802 patients) or with bivalirudin alone (1800 patients) (Figure 1). After emergency angiography, the primary management strategy was primary PCI in 92.7% of the patients, deferred PCI in 0.2%, primary CABG in 1.7%, and medical management in 5.3%.

The baseline features of the groups were well matched (Table 1). The median age was 60.2 years, and 76.6% of the patients were men. The infarct-related vessel was the left anterior descending artery in 40.7% of the patients who were undergoing primary PCI, and stents were implanted in 95.5% of those patients. Compliance with protocol-specified study medications was high (Table 2). Unfractionated heparin (typically a bolus without infusion) was administered before cardiac catheterization in approximately two thirds of the patients who were assigned to treatment with bivalirudin. A 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel was used almost twice as frequently as a 300-mg dose. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered in 129 patients (7.2%) who were assigned to bivalirudin treatment — in 47 because of a sustained absence of reflow after PCI, in 32 because of giant thrombus after PCI, and in the rest for various other clinical indications.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Get Slide
 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Get Slide
 
Table 2. Procedures and Study Medications.

 
Clinical Outcomes

At 30 days, patients who were assigned to receive bivalirudin alone, as compared with those who were assigned to receive heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, had a significantly reduced rate of net adverse clinical events (9.2% vs. 12.1%; relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.92; P=0.005), owing to a lower rate of major bleeding (4.9% vs. 8.3%; relative risk, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.77; P<0.001), with similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (5.4% and 5.5%, respectively; relative risk in the bivalirudin group, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.30; P=0.95) (Table 3 and Figure 2). In a post hoc analysis, with the exclusion of large hematomas from the protocol definition, the rate of major bleeding was reduced from 7.8% with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors to 4.7% with bivalirudin (P<0.001). Bivalirudin, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, also reduced hemorrhagic complications as defined by the TIMI and GUSTO scales, thrombocytopenia, and the need for blood transfusions (Table 3). Among patients in the control group, the peak activated clotting time did not differ significantly between those with major bleeding and those without major bleeding (median, 273 seconds and 263 seconds, respectively; P=0.12).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Get Slide
 
Table 3. Clinical Outcomes at 30 Days.

 
Figure 2
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Get Slide
 
Figure 2. Time-to-Event Curves through 30 Days.

Time-to-event curves through 30 days are shown for net adverse clinical events (Panel A), major bleeding (Panel B), major adverse cardiovascular events (Panel C), and death from cardiac and noncardiac causes (Panel D). Treatment with bivalirudin alone as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors resulted in reduced 30-day rates of net adverse clinical events (9.3% vs. 12.2%; hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.92; P=0.006) and major bleeding (5.0% vs. 8.4%; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.76; P<0.0001), similar 30-day rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (5.5% and 5.5%, respectively; hazard ratio,1.00; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.32; P=0.98), and reduced 30-day rates of death from cardiac causes (1.8% vs. 2.9%; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.96; P=0.03). P values are based on the log-rank test. Event rates represent Kaplan–Meier estimates. GP denotes glycoprotein.

 
Treatment with bivalirudin, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, resulted in significantly lower 30-day rates of death from cardiac causes (1.8% vs. 2.9%; relative risk, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.95; P=0.03) and death from all causes (2.1% vs. 3.1%; relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.00; P=0.047); rates of reinfarction, target-vessel revascularization, and stroke were not significantly different (Table 3 and Figure 2). There were no significant differences in the peak creatine kinase level or creatine kinase MB fraction between the bivalirudin group and the group that received heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (median peak creatine kinase level, 1433.0 U per liter and 1428.5 U per liter, respectively; P=0.79; median peak creatine kinase MB fraction, 162.8 U per liter and 160.1 U per liter, respectively; P=0.98). There were no significant interactions between the treatment assignment and either preprocedural unfractionated-heparin use or clopidogrel loading dose with respect to major adverse cardiovascular events or major bleeding (Table 4).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Get Slide
 
Table 4. Adverse Events According to Medication Administration before PCI.

 
Among 3124 patients in whom stents were successfully implanted, the overall rate of stent thrombosis at 30 days did not differ significantly between the group that received bivalirudin and the group that received heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (2.5% and 1.9%, respectively; P=0.30). However, in a prespecified analysis, within the first 24 hours, stent thrombosis occurred in 17 more patients in the bivalirudin group than in the group receiving heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (1.3% vs. 0.3%, P<0.001), whereas between 24 hours and 30 days, stent thrombosis occurred in 7 fewer patients in the bivalirudin group (1.2% vs. 1.7%, P=0.28). Nonetheless, patients in whom PCI was performed and who were assigned to receive bivalirudin rather than heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor had lower 30-day rates of death from cardiac causes (1.8% vs. 2.8%; relative risk, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.99; P=0.045), major bleeding (5.1% vs. 8.5%; relative risk, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.77; P<0.001), and net adverse clinical events (9.2% vs. 12.2%; relative risk, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.92; P=0.005).

Among the 25 patients in whom stent thrombosis developed within 24 hours, 2 patients died (8.0%), including 1 in each randomized group. In the entire study cohort, of the 93 patients who died within 30 days, death was preceded by major bleeding in 26 patients, 8 of whom were in the bivalirudin group (hazard ratio for death among patients with vs. those without major bleeding, 9.12; 95% CI, 5.73 to 14.52; P<0.001) and by definite stent thrombosis in 5 patients, 1 of whom was in the bivalirudin group (hazard ratio for death among patients with vs. those without definite stent thrombosis, 5.54; 95% CI, 2.24 to 13.69; P<0.001).

Discussion

In this prospective, randomized trial involving patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who were undergoing primary PCI, treatment with the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin (with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors administered in 7.2% of the patients because of suboptimal results of the PCI), as compared with treatment with heparin plus the routine use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, improved event-free survival at 30 days, owing to a significant reduction in major bleeding. The rates of major adverse cardiovascular events were similar in the two treatment groups. Bivalirudin reduced the rate of major bleeding, as classified not only by the protocol definition but also by the laboratory-based TIMI scale and the clinical GUSTO scale, and in addition reduced the rates of thrombocytopenia and blood transfusion, despite the significantly higher peak activated clotting time among patients treated with bivalirudin. Moreover, random assignment to bivalirudin alone as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors significantly reduced the rates of death from cardiac causes and from all causes at 30 days.

The reduction in mortality with bivalirudin as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the present trial may be attributable to the prevention of iatrogenic hemorrhagic complications. Previous trials have documented the independent relationship between major bleeding (with or without blood transfusions) and subsequent death.16,17,18,19 Major bleeding was a more powerful predictor of death than periprocedural myocardial infarction after PCI in the Randomized Evaluation of PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events 2 (REPLACE-2) trial, and the reduction in bleeding with bivalirudin as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors resulted in a trend toward reduced late mortality after PCI among the relatively low-risk patients in that study.27 In the present trial, more deaths occurred after major bleeding (26 deaths) than after reinfarction (10) or definite stent thrombosis (5). The 40% relative reduction in major bleeding in the bivalirudin group as compared with the group that received heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, with similar rates of ischemic complications, may thus explain the observed improvement in survival with bivalirudin in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, who are at higher risk than the patients in the REPLACE-2 trial. Moreover, anticoagulation with bivalirudin reduced the occurrence of severe thrombocytopenia, which has also been strongly associated with death among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and with PCI.14,15

Among patients in whom a stent was successfully implanted, assignment to bivalirudin, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, resulted in 17 more episodes of stent thrombosis within the first 24 hours, representing a significant 1.0% absolute increase, which was partially offset by 7 fewer events in the patients treated with bivalirudin between 24 hours and 30 days (absolute reduction, 0.5%). The early increase in stent thrombosis with bivalirudin alone may be explained by adenosine diphosphate–induced platelet activation before maximal thienopyridine blockade of the P2Y12 receptor28 or by residual thrombin activity after the discontinuation of bivalirudin. However, although the increase in acute thrombotic events probably underlies the increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events that was noted on the first day among patients treated with bivalirudin, the overall 30-day rates of reinfarction were not increased — 1.8% in each group — and only 2 of the 93 deaths in the study occurred after acute stent thrombosis (1 in each randomized group). The prognostic implications of acute stent thrombosis that occurs early in the hospital phase in closely monitored patients who have undergone primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and that affects a previously infarcted myocardial territory may thus differ from the implications of subacute stent thrombosis or acute thrombosis that occurs after discharge from the hospital in patients who have undergone elective PCI and whose left ventricular function was well preserved. Most important, the rate of death from cardiac causes (including deaths due to stent thrombosis) among patients who were treated with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor surpassed that among patients treated with bivalirudin by day 7, and by 30 days, a significant 37.9% relative reduction in death from cardiac causes (an absolute decrease of 1.1%) was seen in the group treated with bivalirudin. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether the risk of early stent thrombosis can be mitigated by treatment with more rapidly acting and potent thienopyridine agents,29,30 a longer course of bivalirudin, or both, without increasing the risk of bleeding. Pending such studies, the 1% incremental risk of stent thrombosis within the first 24 hours, with no significant difference in the rates at 30 days, must be placed in the context of the decrease in the rate of major bleeding and the subsequent 1% absolute reduction in mortality from cardiac causes that were achieved with the abbreviated use of bivalirudin (i.e., only during PCI) as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

The present study has several strengths, including the enrollment of a broad cross section of patients. Nonetheless, several limitations should be noted. First, the logistic complexities of the trial necessitated an open-label design, introducing potential bias. However, compliance with the protocol procedure and the study medications was high, and the rate of provisional use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the bivalirudin group was low and similar to that in the double-blind REPLACE-2 trial.20 The relative reductions in hemorrhagic complications with bivalirudin as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the present trial were also similar to those in the REPLACE-2 trial.20 Potential bias was further mitigated by the use of blinded core laboratories and a clinical-event adjudication committee that required original-source documentation for event verification. Second, a heparin bolus was administered in the emergency room to approximately two thirds of the patients, with bivalirudin most commonly started in the cardiac catheterization laboratory 30 minutes later, before PCI. Interaction testing, however, showed that administration of bivalirudin significantly reduced major bleeding independently of preprocedural administration of heparin, and preprocedural administration of heparin before bivalirudin was associated with a weak trend toward reduced major adverse cardiovascular events at 30 days. Third, the trial was underpowered for low-frequency end points, including death. However, the mechanistic underpinnings for the observed reduction in the rate of death with bivalirudin (i.e., reduced risks of bleeding, transfusion, and thrombocytopenia), in concert with the consistency of our results with those of earlier studies,20,21,22,23 provide reassurance that this finding is probably valid. Fourth, reinfarction may be difficult to detect after primary PCI, although the nearly identical peak levels of cardiac enzymes after PCI in the two treatment groups suggest that there was no difference in the rate of reinfarction. Finally, although an independent, unblinded statistical monitoring group has found no interactions between the type of stent used and the randomly assigned study drug for the primary 30-day end points, longer-term follow-up, including unblinding of the stent randomization data at 1 year, is required to evaluate thoroughly the effect of bivalirudin in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who are undergoing primary PCI.

In conclusion, our trial shows that in patients with evolving ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who are undergoing primary PCI, the use of bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, results in significantly reduced 30-day rates of major bleeding and increased event-free survival.

Supported by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, with grant support from Boston Scientific and the Medicines Company.

Dr. Stone reports receiving consulting fees from Medtronic, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, and Bristol-Myers Squibb and grant support from Boston Scientific, the Medicines Company, and Abbott Vascular. Dr. Guagliumi reports receiving consulting fees from or serving on advisory boards for Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific and receiving grant support from Medtronic and Boston Scientific. Dr. Dudek reports receiving lecture fees from Nycomed. Dr. Gersh reports receiving consulting fees from or serving on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abbott Laboratories, and Boston Scientific and having equity interest in CV Therapeutics. Dr. Pocock reports receiving consulting fees from and serving on an advisory board for the Medicines Company. Dr. Kirtane reports receiving consulting fees from or serving on advisory boards for Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific and receiving lecture fees from the Medicines Company and Alphamedica. Dr. Mehran reports receiving lecture fees from Boston Scientific and the Medicines Company. Dr. Parise reports being employed by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

* The investigators, institutions, and research organizations participating in the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) Trial are listed in the Appendix.


Source Information

From Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York (G.W.S., G.D., A.J.K., H.P., R.M.); Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin (B.W.); Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy (G.G.); Silesian Center for Heart Disease, Lodz, Poland (J.Z.P.); LeBauer Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Moses Cone Hospital, Greensboro, NC (B.R.B.); Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland (D.D.); Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel (R.K.); Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany (F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (B.J.G.); London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London (S.J.P.); and New York–Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York (S.C.W.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Stone at Columbia University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 111 E. 59th St., 11th Fl., New York, NY 10022, or at gs2184{at}columbia.edu.

References

  1. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003;361:13-20. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Schömig A, Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, et al. A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1084-1089. [Free Full Text]
  3. Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, et al. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:957-966. [Free Full Text]
  4. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Ottervanger JP, et al. Comparison between stenting and balloon in elderly patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 2007;119:306-309. [CrossRef][Medline]
  5. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Stone GW, Antoniucci D, Neumann FJ, Chiarello M. Adjunctive mechanical devices to prevent distal embolization in patients undergoing mechanical revascularization for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2007;153:343-353. [CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Ross AM, Gibbons RJ, Stone GW, Kloner RA, Alexander RW. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of adenosine as an adjunct to reperfusion in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMISTAD-II). J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1775-1780. [Free Full Text]
  7. Armstrong PW, Granger CB, Adams PX, et al. Pexelizumab for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007;297:43-51. [Free Full Text]
  8. Alexander JH, Reynolds HR, Stebbins AL, et al. Effect of tilarginine acetate in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: the TRIUMPH randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007;297:1657-1666. [Free Full Text]
  9. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Stone GW, et al. Abciximab as adjunctive therapy to reperfusion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA 2005;293:1759-1765. [Free Full Text]
  10. Kandzari DE, Hasselblad V, Tcheng JE, et al. Improved clinical outcomes with abciximab therapy in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic overview of randomized clinical trials. Am Heart J 2004;147:457-462. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Dauerman HL, Frederick PD, Miller D, French WJ. Current incidence and clinical outcomes of bivalirudin administration among patients undergoing primary coronary intervention for stent thrombosis elevation acute myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis 2007;18:141-148. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Fox KA, Steg PG, Eagle KA, et al. Decline in rates of death and heart failure in acute coronary syndromes, 1999-2006. JAMA 2007;297:1892-1900. [Free Full Text]
  13. Montalescot G, Barragan P, Wittenberg O, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1895-1903. [Free Full Text]
  14. Kereiakes DJ, Berkowitz SD, Lincoff AM, et al. Clinical correlates and course of thrombocytopenia during percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of abciximab platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade. Am Heart J 2000;140:74-80. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Nikolsky E, Grines CL, Cox DA, et al. Impact of baseline platelet count in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction (from the CADILLAC trial). Am J Cardiol 2007;99:1055-1061. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Eikelboom JW, Mehta SR, Anand SS, Xie C, Fox KA, Yusuf S. Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2006;114:774-782. [Free Full Text]
  17. Kinnaird TD, Stabile E, Mintz GS, et al. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:930-935. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Rao SV, Jollis JG, Harrington RA, et al. Relationship of blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2004;292:1555-1562. [Free Full Text]
  19. Manoukian SV, Feit F, Mehran R, et al. Impact of major bleeding on 30-day mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the ACUITY trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1362-1368. [Free Full Text]
  20. Lincoff AM, Bittl JA, Harrington RA, et al. Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention: REPLACE-2 randomized trial. JAMA 2003;289:853-863. [Erratum, JAMA 2003;289:1638.] [Free Full Text]
  21. Lincoff AM, Kleiman NS, Kereiakes DJ, et al. Long-term efficacy of bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade vs heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary revascularization: REPLACE-2 randomized trial. JAMA 2004;292:696-703. [Erratum, JAMA 2006;296:46.] [Free Full Text]
  22. Stone GW, McLaurin BT, Cox DA, et al. Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2203-2216. [Free Full Text]
  23. Stone GW, Ware JH, Bertrand ME, et al. Antithrombotic strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early invasive management: one-year results from the ACUITY trial. JAMA 2007;298:2497-2506. [Free Full Text]
  24. Stone GW, Bertrand M, Colombo A, et al. Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) trial: study design and rationale. Am Heart J 2004;148:764-775. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 2007;115:2344-2351. [Free Full Text]
  26. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc [B] 1995;57:289-300.
  27. Feit F, Voeltz MD, Attubato MJ, et al. Predictors and impact of major hemorrhage on mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis of the REPLACE-2 trial. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1364-1369. [CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Zaman KA, Yoho JA, Hayes KM, Tantry US. Clopidogrel loading with eptifibatide to arrest the reactivity of platelets: results of the Clopidogrel Loading with Eptifibatide to Arrest the Reactivity of Platelets (CLEAR PLATELETS) study. Circulation 2005;111:1153-1159. [Free Full Text]
  29. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2001-2015. [Free Full Text]
  30. Greenbaum AB, Ohman EM, Gibson CM, et al. Preliminary experience with intravenous P2Y12 platelet receptor inhibition as an adjunct to reduced-dose alteplase during acute myocardial infarction: results of the Safety, Tolerability and Effect on Patency in Acute Myocardial Infarction (STEP-AMI) angiographic trial. Am Heart J 2007;154:702-709. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Appendix

The following investigators and institutions participated in the HORIZONS-AMI Trial: Executive Committee: G.W. Stone (principal investigator and chair), Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York; B.R. Brodie, LeBauer Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Moses Cone Hospital, Greensboro, NC; D.A. Cox, Mid Carolina Cardiology, Charlotte, NC; C.L. Grines, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI; B.D. Rutherford, St. Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, MO. Pharmacology Committee: D. Bhatt, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland; G. Dangas, Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York; F. Feit, New York University, New York; M. Ohman, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. European Steering Committee: H. Bonnier, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; A. Colombo, Colombus Hospital, Milan; E. Garcia, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Madrid; E. Grube, Heart Center Siegburg, Siegburg, Germany; G. Guagliumi, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy; A. Kastrati, Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany; P. Serruys, Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; H. Suryapranata, Hospital De Weezenlanden, Zwolle, the Netherlands. Country Leaders: the Netherlands: H. Bonnier and H. Suryapranata; Italy: A. Colombo and G. Guagliumi; Spain: E. Garcia; Germany: E. Grube and A. Kastrati; Israel: Y. Almagor; United Kingdom: A. Banning; Argentina: J. Belardi, L. Grinfeld; Poland: D. Dudek; Austria: K. Huber; Norway: D. Nilsen; Sweden: G. Olivecrona; Denmark: L. Rasmussen. Clinical Endpoints Committee: Cardiovascular Research Foundation Data Center, New York, S.C. Wong (chair). Field Officers: M. Farkouh (chair), M. Attubato, G. Dangas, F. Feit, R. Mehran. Site Management and Data Monitoring: J. Tyson and Associates (U.S.), D-Target (Europe), Tango (South America). Data Management: E-trials, Morrisville, NC, D. Winsted (manager). Data Coordination and Analysis: Cardiovascular Research Foundation Data Center, New York, R. Mehran (director), I. Bihl (operations), H. Parise (statistics). Data Safety and Monitoring Board: B.J. Gersh (chair), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; D. Faxon, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; S. King, Fuqua Heart Center, Atlanta; S.J. Pocock, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London; D.O. Williams, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI. Qualitative and Quantitative Coronary Angiographic Core Laboratory Analysis: Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, A.J. Lansky (director), E. Cristea (operations). Qualitative and Quantitative Electrocardiographic Core Laboratory Analysis: Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, J. Reiffel (director). Intravascular Ultrasound Core Laboratory Analysis: Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, G. Mintz (director). Biomarker Substudy Core Laboratory: BioSite, San Diego, CA.

For a full list of participating countries (with total enrollment), hospitals, and principal investigators, see the Supplementary Appendix (available with the full text of this article at www.nejm.org).


 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-Supplementary Material

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Morrow, D. A.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.