The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 358:431-433 January 24, 2008 Number 4
NextNext

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

 

This Article
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Nallamothu, B. K.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: Several studies have evaluated the role of combination medical therapies administered upstream of primary percutaneous intervention (PCI). As noted in the review of the time to treatment in PCI, by Nallamothu et al. (Oct. 18 issue),1 these trials have failed to demonstrate a survival benefit from either full-dose fibrinolysis plus PCI or reduced-dose fibrinolysis in combination with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists plus PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. However, there is evidence of improved outcomes with early administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa anatagonists as compared with administration in the catheterization laboratory.2 A Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade of 2 or 3 was significantly more frequent in the group in which glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists were administered early than in the late-administration group, and there was a trend toward a reduction in mortality.2 A TIMI flow grade of 2 or 3 before PCI is associated with a decrease in adverse events and improved 1-year outcomes.2,3 Other studies have revealed decreased 30-day mortality and reinfarction rates with the use of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab.4 Thus, these data support early administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors to improve outcomes in patients undergoing primary PCI.


Roger Kapoor, M.D., M.B.A.
John R. Kapoor, M.D., Ph.D.
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305

References

  1. Nallamothu BK, Bradley EH, Krumholz HM. Time to treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1631-1638. [Free Full Text]
  2. Montalescot G, Borentain M, Payot L, Collet JP, Thomas D. Early vs late administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2004;292:362-366. [Free Full Text]
  3. Mehta RH, Harjai KJ, Cox D, et al. Clinical and angiographic correlates and outcomes of suboptimal coronary flow inpatients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1739-1746. [Free Full Text]
  4. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Stone GW, et al. Abciximab as adjunctive therapy to reperfusion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA 2005;293:1759-1765. [Free Full Text]

 
To the Editor: In their review of primary PCI, Nallamothu et al. reaffirm the importance of the time to treatment and underscore the point that the superiority of PCI over thrombolysis is limited in time, "reaching equipoise between 60 and 120 minutes." Therefore, facilitated PCI by means of pretreatment with tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) was seen as a logical option. But as the authors emphasize, this combination actually increased mortality. The incompatibility of t-PA with PCI may be related to t-PA's procoagulant effect and the significant rate of coronary reocclusion.1 In contrast, prourokinase follows another fibrinolytic paradigm2 and has a very different mode of action.3 Indeed, prourokinase caused no measurable thrombin generation and little reocclusion (1.4%),4 indicating that the above complications should not be seen as an inevitable accompaniment of all thrombolytic agents.

Therefore, it is surprising that in their discussion of future challenges, the authors do not include a thrombolytic agent that is compatible with PCI. Surely, the optimal reperfusion strategy would be immediate thrombolysis followed by PCI, thereby also addressing the critical issue of microvascular perfusion. This possibility may not be beyond reach.


Victor Gurewich, M.D.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, MA 02215
vgurewic{at}bidmc.harvard.edu

References

  1. Fitzgerald DJ, Fitzgerald GA. Role of thrombin and thromboxane A2 in reocclusion following coronary thrombolysis with tissue-type plasminogen activator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989;86:7585-7589. [Free Full Text]
  2. Pannell R, Black J, Gurewich V. Complementary modes of action of tissue-type plasminogen activator and pro-urokinase by which their synergistic effect on clot lysis may be explained. J Clin Invest 1988;81:853-859. [ISI][Medline]
  3. Liu JN, Gurewich V. A comparative study of the promotion of tissue plasminogen activator and pro-urokinase-induced plasminogen activation by fragments D and E-2 of fibrin. J Clin Invest 1991;88:2012-2017. [ISI][Medline]
  4. Weaver DA, Hartmann JR, Anderson JL, Reddy PS, Sobolski JC, Sasahara AA. New recombinant glycosylated prourokinase for the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:1242-1248. [Abstract]

 
To the Editor: Nallamothu et al. note that fibrinolytic therapy remains a practical option for many patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction when there is no immediate access to a catheterization laboratory. Despite data showing the superiority of primary PCI over thrombolysis, aspects of prehospital fibrinolysis should be mentioned. Because the benefit of thrombolysis is maximal during the first 2 hours after the onset of symptoms, and most patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction present to hospitals without on-site PCI facilities, transport delays may limit the benefits of PCI ("time is myocardium"). Data from the Comparison of Angioplasty and Prehospital Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPTIM) trial showed that in the group of patients treated with prehospital thrombolysis who were randomized less than 2 hours after the onset of symptoms, as compared with the primary-PCI group, there was a trend toward lower 30-day mortality, and cardiogenic shock was less frequent (occurring in 1.3% of patients, vs. 5.3% in the primary-PCI group; P=0.032).1 Prehospital thrombolysis is safe, may shorten the time until reperfusion therapy by about 60 minutes,2 and is associated with a fourfold increase in aborted myocardial infarction, as compared with in-hospital treatment.3 Patients with ST-segment myocardial infarction who were treated with facilitated PCI after prehospital fibrinolysis had improved tissue perfusion and smaller infarcts, with a trend toward a better clinical outcome.4


Sebastian Szabo, M.D.
Thomas Oikonomopoulos, M.D.
Hans Martin Hoffmeister, M.D., Ph.D.
Städtisches Klinikum Solingen
42653 Solingen, Germany
krisztinaszb{at}aol.com

References

  1. Steg PG, Bonnefoy E, Chabaud S, et al. Impact of time to treatment on mortality after prehospital fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty: data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical trial. Circulation 2003;108:2851-2856. [Free Full Text]
  2. Chittari MS, Ahmad I, Chambers B, Knight F, Scriven A, Pitcher D. Retrospective observational case-control study comparing prehospital thrombolytic therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy for patients from same area. Emerg Med J 2005;22:582-585. [Free Full Text]
  3. Lamfers EJ, Hooghoudt TE, Hertzberger DP, Schut A, Stolwijk PW, Verheugt FW. Abortion of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction after reperfusion: incidence, patients' characteristics, and prognosis. Heart 2003;89:496-501. [Free Full Text]
  4. Thiele H, Engelmann L, Elsner K, et al. Comparison of pre-hospital combination-fibrinolysis plus conventional care with pre-hospital combination-fibrinolysis plus facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1956-1963. [Free Full Text]

 
The authors reply: Kapoor and Kapoor highlight the potential role of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in a "facilitated" approach, when used "upstream" of PCI. We agree that this strategy has been associated with improvements in TIMI flow grades but note the inconclusive data in regard to a clinical benefit.1 Indeed, the Facilitated Intervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events (FINESSE) trial investigators recently reported that upstream administration of abciximab did not provide an additional clinical benefit when compared with in-laboratory administration.2

Gurewich points out the existing limitations of fibrinolytic-therapy drugs that have been combined with PCI in contemporary trials. His observation that some drugs in this class (e.g., prourokinase) may be better suited for use with PCI because of diminished procoagulant effects is provocative, particularly given the higher rates of reinfarction noted with tenecteplase plus PCI in the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy for Acute Myocardial Infarction (ASSENT) 4 trial.3 However, recent results from the FINESSE and ASSENT-4 trials may make it challenging to pursue this area further.

We agree with Szabo and colleagues that prehospital fibrinolytic therapy is safe and effective when delivered within organized emergency-medical-service (EMS) systems that are capable of making a rapid diagnosis and treating eligible patients outside the hospital. However, several barriers — unrelated to the clinical benefit — continue to prevent the practical application of this strategy in the United States. These include limited funding and infrastructure within EMS systems in general, as well as concerns about legal liability and reimbursement.4 In addition, EMS systems with enough volume to justify dedicating resources to overcome these barriers are likely to be in urban areas where there is the potential for rapid access to primary PCI.5


Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, M.D., M.P.H.
Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Ann Arbor, MI 48109


Elizabeth H. Bradley, Ph.D.
Harlan M. Krumholz, M.D., S.M.
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520
harlan.krumholz{at}yale.edu

References

  1. Montalescot G, Borentain M, Payot L, Collet JP, Thomas D. Early vs late administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2004;292:362-366. [Free Full Text]
  2. Ellis SG. The Facilitated Intervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events (FINESSE) trial. Presented at the European Society of Cardiology Annual Congress, Vienna, September 1–5, 2007.
  3. Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ASSENT-4 PCI) Investigators. Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial. Lancet 2006;367:569-578. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Welsh RC, Ornato J, Armstrong PW. Prehospital management of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a time for reappraisal in North America. Am Heart J 2003;145:1-8. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Nallamothu BK, Bates ER, Wang Y, Bradley EH, Krumholz HM. Driving times and distances to hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: implications for prehospital triage of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation 2006;113:1189-1195. [Free Full Text]

 

This Article
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Nallamothu, B. K.
-PubMed Citation


HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.