The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 360:2247-2248 May 21, 2009 Number 21
NextNext

Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets

 

This Article
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Sacks, F. M.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: Sacks et al. (Feb. 26 issue)1 compare weight-loss diets that vary in macronutrient content, with a targeted maximal difference in the proportion of calories derived from carbohydrates, fat, and protein of 30, 20, and 10 percentage points, respectively. The realized macronutrient differences were substantially smaller than the planned targets, and at 2 years, weight loss was similar in pairwise comparisons of intakes at the high and low extremes of each macronutrient. Neither the targeted nor the actual intakes of carbohydrates or fat in any of the diets would classify them as being substantially low in these macronutrients. Unfortunately, the diets were portrayed this way in the media.2 Given the small differences in reported macronutrient intake and the even smaller differences in biomarker-predicted intakes, one may conclude that small differences in dietary macronutrient content do not affect weight loss. However, the question of whether larger differences in macronutrients preferentially promote weight loss remains unanswered by this study.


Christy L. Boling, M.D.
Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Durham, NC 27705
christy.boling{at}duke.edu


Eric C. Westman, M.D., M.H.S.
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, NC 27710


William S. Yancy, M.D., M.H.S.
Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Durham, NC 27705

References

  1. Sacks FM, Bray GA, Carey VJ, et al. Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates. N Engl J Med 2009;360:859-873. [Free Full Text]
  2. Parker-Pope T. Study zeroes in on calories, not diet, for loss. New York Times. February 25, 2009.

 
The authors reply: Boling and colleagues raise a valid point. We did not test very-low-carbohydrate intake because we had a concern — based on previous studies — that participants would not be able to sustain such a low intake beyond the initial 2 to 4 months, even with continual instruction and assistance from the research staff of dietitians and behavioral psychologists. For example, Foster et al. found that after 3 months there was no difference in levels of urinary ketones between participants who were assigned to the Atkins diet, which starts with an intake of 20 g or less of carbohydrates per day and increases to an intake of 50 g or less per day (approximately 10% of the daily requirement of kilocalories), and participants who were assigned to conventional diets.1 Foster and colleagues opined that long-term adherence may be difficult, and other studies support this view, showing that adherence to carbohydrate goals deteriorates within 2 to 3 months and that intake increases to 37% at 6 months2 and to approximately 34 to 40% at 12 months.3,4,5 The Atkins approach may work well for some persons, but the data from randomized trials provide support for the view that low-carbohydrate diets, whether extreme or moderate, do not consistently result in more weight loss than other approaches. Moreover, our findings confirm that despite best efforts, studies that compare diets for weight loss have not shown large differences in dietary macronutrient composition.


Frank M. Sacks, M.D.
Harvard School of Public Health
Boston, MA 02115
fsacks{at}hsph.harvard.edu


George A. Bray, M.D.
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Baton Rouge, LA 70808


Catherine Loria, Ph.D.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Bethesda, MD 20892

References

  1. Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, et al. A randomized trial of a low-carbohydrate diet for obesity. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2082-2090. [Free Full Text]
  2. Samaha FF, Iqbal N, Seshadri P, et al. A low-carbohydrate as compared with a low-fat diet in severe obesity. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2074-2081. [Free Full Text]
  3. Dansinger ML, Gleason JA, Griffith JL, Selker JP, Schaefer EJ. Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: a randomized trial. JAMA 2005;293:43-53. [Free Full Text]
  4. Gardner CD, Kiazand A, Alhassan S, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal women. JAMA 2007;297:969-977. [Erratum, JAMA 2007;298:178.] [Free Full Text]
  5. Shai I, Schwarzfuchs D, Henkin Y, et al. Weight loss with a low-carbohydrate, Mediterranean, or low-fat diet. N Engl J Med 2008;359:229-241. [Free Full Text]

 

This Article
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Sacks, F. M.
-PubMed Citation


HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.