|
Published at www.nejm.org November 11, 2009 (10.1056/NEJMc0910060) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In a 13-year-old boy with asthma, infection with the 2009 H1N1 virus developed and was confirmed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) testing of a nasopharyngeal aspirate. Administration of oseltamivir (60 mg twice a day for 5 days for this boy who weighed 32 kg) was begun, and the patient was discharged home the same day. Simultaneous with treatment of the index patient, postexposure prophylaxis with oseltamivir (75 mg once a day for 10 days) was prescribed to all household contacts (the boy's 59-year-old father, who had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and was taking prednisone at a dose of 5 mg daily; 50-year-old mother; and 15-year-old and 18-year-old sisters). Approximately 24 hours after oseltamivir prophylaxis was begun, influenza-like symptoms developed in the father (Figure 1). On day 8 of oseltamivir prophylaxis, the father consulted his general practitioner because of persistent cough. A nasopharyngeal aspirate collected at that time was positive for the 2009 H1N1 virus, according to RT-PCR testing and culture. The father had an uneventful clinical course, and a nasopharyngeal aspirate sampled at the end of his illness was negative for the 2009 H1N1 virus. Influenza-like symptoms did not develop in any other household contacts.
|
Our results indicate that the same neuraminidase mutation (H275Y) is associated with oseltamivir resistance not only in seasonal H1N13 and avian H5N14 viruses but now also in 2009 pandemic H1N1 strains. We hypothesize that the presence of subtherapeutic levels of oseltamivir at a time when viral replication had already begun was an important factor that led to the emergence of the resistant virus in the father of our index patient. Other oseltamivir-resistant strains of 2009 H1N1 virus detected during postexposure prophylaxis have been reported to the World Health Organization.5
These observations support the need for limiting the indications for postexposure prophylaxis. It also seems reasonable to rapidly convert prophylactic (once daily) regimens to therapeutic (twice daily) regimens as soon as influenza-like symptoms develop in a patient receiving prophylactic treatment. Monitoring for the H275Y mutation during outbreaks of 2009 H1N1 virus is important in order to rapidly identify transmission events that could lead to large-scale dissemination of an oseltamivir-resistant 2009 H1N1 virus, similar to what occurred with recent H1N1 virus seasonal strains.3
Mariana Baz, M.Sc.
Yacine Abed, Ph.D.
Jesse Papenburg, M.D.
Xavier Bouhy, B.Sc.
Marie-Ève Hamelin, Ph.D.
Guy Boivin, M.D.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec
Quebec, QC, Canada
guy.boivin{at}crchul.ulaval.ca
Financial and other disclosures provided by the authors are available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org.
This letter (10.1056/NEJMc0910060) was published on November 11, 2009, at NEJM.org.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | TERMS OF USE | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |