|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Over the past 15 years, Internet technology has become integral to public health surveillance. Systems using informal electronic information have been credited with reducing the time to recognition of an outbreak, preventing governments from suppressing outbreak information, and facilitating public health responses to outbreaks and emerging diseases. Because Web-based sources frequently contain data not captured through traditional government communication channels, they are useful to public health agencies, including the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network of the World Health Organization (WHO), which relies on such sources for daily surveillance activities.
Early efforts in this area were made by the International Society for Infectious Diseases' Program for Monitoring Emerging Diseases, or ProMED-mail, which was founded in 1994 and has grown into a large, publicly available reporting system, with more than 45,000 subscribers in 188 countries.2 ProMED uses the Internet to disseminate information on outbreaks by e-mailing and posting case reports, including many gleaned from readers, along with expert commentary. In 1997, the Public Health Agency of Canada, in collaboration with the WHO, created the Global Public Health Intelligence Network (GPHIN), whose software retrieves relevant articles from news aggregators every 15 minutes, using extensive search queries. ProMED and GPHIN played critical roles in informing public health officials of the outbreak of SARS, or severe acute respiratory syndrome, in Guangdong, China, as early as November 2002, by identifying informal reports on the Web through news media and chat-room discussions.
More recently, the advent of openly available news aggregators and visualization tools has spawned a new generation of disease-surveillance "mashups" (Web application hybrids) that can mine, categorize, filter, and visualize online intelligence about epidemics in real time. For instance, HealthMap (see image) is an openly available public health intelligence system that uses data from disparate sources to produce a global view of ongoing infectious disease threats. It has between 1000 and 150,000 users per day, including public health officials, clinicians, and international travelers. Other similar systems include MediSys, Argus, EpiSPIDER, BioCaster, and the Wildlife Disease Information Node. Automated analysis of online video materials and radio broadcasts will soon provide additional sources for early detection.
|
Although news media represent an important adjunct to the public health infrastructure, the information they report pales in comparison to the potential collective intelligence that can be garnered from the public. An estimated 37 to 52% of Americans seek health-related information on the Internet each year, generally using search engines to find advice on conditions, symptoms, and treatments. Logs of users' chosen keywords and location information encoded in their computers' IP (Internet Protocol) addresses can be analyzed to provide a low-cost data stream yielding important insights into current disease trends.3 The power of these data has been demonstrated by studies of search engines provided by Google4 and Yahoo,5 in which data on searches using influenza-related keywords were used to generate an epidemic curve that closely matched that generated by traditional surveillance for influenza-related illness, deaths, and laboratory results. Google Flu Trends now provides a prospective view of current influenza search patterns throughout the United States. By making the information freely available to public health officials, clinicians, and ordinary citizens, such tools could help to guide medical decision making and underscore the importance of vaccination and other preventive measures.
An example of the power of search-term surveillance can be found in an examination of the recent peanut-butter–associated outbreak of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium. Using Google Insights for Search, a search-volume reporting tool from Google, we compared the epidemic curve of onset dates for confirmed infections with trends in the volume of Internet searches on related terms in the United States (see graph). Search terms included "diarrhea," "peanut butter," "food poisoning," "recall," and "salmonella," and search volumes were compared with the corresponding volumes from the previous year. The initial public report of salmonella was released on January 7, 2009, triggering an increase in searches for "salmonella," "recall," and "peanut butter," but we saw earlier peaks in searches for "diarrhea" and "food poisoning." Admittedly, these data provide only preliminary evidence of an emerging problem and require further study, but they highlight possibilities for early disease detection.
|
Broader Web-based networks are also proving useful for surveillance. Social-networking sites for clinicians, patients, and the general public hold potential for harnessing the collective wisdom of the masses for disease detection. Given the continued deployment of personally controlled electronic health records, we expect that patients' contributions to disease surveillance will increase. Eventually, mobile-phone technology, enabled by global positioning systems and coupled with short-message-service messaging (texting) and "microblogging" (with Twitter), might also come into play. For instance, an organization called Innovative Support to Emergencies, Diseases, and Disasters (InSTEDD) has developed open-source technology to permit seamless cross-border communication between mobile devices for early warning and response in resource-constrained settings.
These Internet-based systems are quickly becoming dominant sources of information on emerging diseases, though their effects on public health measures remain uncertain. Information overload, false reports, lack of specificity of signals, and sensitivity to external forces such as media interest may limit the realization of their potential for public health practice and clinical decision making. Sources such as analyses of search-term use and news media may also face difficulties with verification and follow-up. Though they hold promise, these new technologies require careful evaluation. Ultimately, the Internet provides a powerful communications channel, but it is health care professionals and the public who will best determine how to use this channel for surveillance, prevention, and control of emerging diseases.
Digital Resources for Disease Detection.
Sample Web-based data sources
ProMED-mail, www.promedmail.org
Global Public Health Intelligence Network (GPHIN), www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/media/nr-rp/2004/2004_gphin-rmispbk-eng.php
HealthMap, www.healthmap.org
MediSys, http://medusa.jrc.it
EpiSPIDER, www.epispider.org
BioCaster, http://biocaster.nii.ac.jp
Wildlife Disease Information Node, http://wildlifedisease.nbii.gov
H5N1 Google Earth mashup, www.nature.com/avianflu/google-earth
Avian Influenza Daily Digest and blog, www.aidailydigest.blogspot.com
Google Flu Trends, www.google.org/flutrends
Google Insights for Search, www.google.com/insights/search
DiSTRIBuTE, www.syndromic.org/projects/DiSTRIBuTE.htm
GeoSentinel, www.istm.org/geosentinel/main.html
Emerging Infections Network, http://ein.idsociety.org
Argus, http://biodefense.georgetown.edu
Sample health-related social-networking sites
Physicians, www.sermo.com
Patients, www.patientslikeme.com
Everyone, www.healthysocial.org
Dr. Brownstein, Mr. Freifeld, and Dr. Madoff report receiving grant support from Google.org. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Source Information
Dr. Brownstein is a faculty member at the Children's Hospital Informatics Program, Children's Hospital Boston, and an assistant professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School, Boston. Mr. Freifeld is a research software developer at the Children's Hospital Informatics Program in Boston and a master's candidate in the New Media Medicine Group of the MIT Media Laboratory in Cambridge, MA. Dr. Brownstein and Mr. Freifeld are the cocreators of the HealthMap system. Dr. Madoff is a professor of medicine at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, an infectious disease physician with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, and editor of ProMED-mail, a program of the International Society for Infectious Diseases.
This article (10.1056/NEJMp0900702) was published at NEJM.org on May 7, 2009.
References
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | TERMS OF USE | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |