FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 298:650-658 March 23, 1978 Number 12 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

The financing system for medical costs in this country suffers from severe inflation and inequity. The tax-supported system of fee for service for doctors, third-party intermediaries and cost reimbursement for hospitals produces inflation by rewarding cost-increasing behavior and failing to provide incentives for economy. The system is inequitable because the government pays more on behalf of those who choose more costly systems of care, because tax benefits subsidize the health insurance of the well-to-do, while not helping many low-income people, and because employment health insurance does not guarantee continuity of coverage and is regressive in its financing. Analysis of previous proposals for national health insurance shows none to be capable of solving most of these problems. Direct economic regulation by government will not improve the situation. Cost controls through incentives and regulated competition in the private sector are most likely to be effective.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Enthoven, A. C., van de Ven, W. P.M.M. (2007). Going Dutch -- Managed-Competition Health Insurance in the Netherlands. NEJM 357: 2421-2423 [Full Text]  
• Wodchis, W. P., Ross, J. S., Detsky, A. S. (2007). Is P4P Really FFS?. JAMA 298: 1797-1799 [Full Text]  
• Enthoven, A. C., Fuchs, V. R. (2006). Employment-Based Health Insurance: Past, Present, And Future. Health Aff (Millwood) 25: 1538-1547 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hall, M. A., Havighurst, C. C. (2005). Reviving Managed Care With Health Savings Accounts. Health Aff (Millwood) 24: 1490-1500 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Berenson, R. A. (2005). Which Way For Competition? None Of The Above. Health Aff (Millwood) 24: 1536-1542 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rice, T., Desmond, K. A. (2004). The Distributional Consequences of a Medicare Premium Support Proposal. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 29: 1187-1226 [Abstract]  
• Enthoven, A. C. (2002). The Fortune 500 Model for Health Care: Is Now the Time to Change?. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 27: 37-48  
• Christianson, J. B., Parente, S. T., Taylor, R. (2002). Defined-Contribution Health Insurance Products: Development And Prospects. Health Aff (Millwood) 21: 49-64 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Reinhardt, U. E. (2001). Can Efficiency in Health Care Be Left to the Market?. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 26: 967-992  
• Reinhardt, U. E. (2000). Academic Medicine's Financial Accountability and Responsibility. JAMA 284: 1136-1138 [Full Text]  
• Schut, F. T. (1995). Health Care Reform in the Netherlands: Balancing Corporatism, Etatism, and Market Mechanisms. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 20: 615-652 [Abstract]  
• Ermann, D., Richmond, J. (1994). Managed Care Arrangements: Barriers to Cost Savings Potential. Med Care Res Rev 51: 125-148  
• Iglehart, J. K. (1993). Managed Competition. NEJM 328: 1208-1212 [Full Text]  
• Relman, A. S. (1993). Controlling Costs by "Managed Competition" -- Would It Work?. NEJM 328: 133-135 [Full Text]  
• Rice, T., Nelson, L., Colby, D. C. (1992). Will Medicare Beneficiaries Switch Physicians? A Test of Economic Competition. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 17: 3-24 [Abstract]  
• Rice, T., Gabel, J., de Lissovoy, G. (1989). PPOs: The Employer Perspective. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 14: 367-382 [Abstract]  
• Enthoven, A. (1988). Managed Competition of Alternative Delivery Systems. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 13: 305-321 [Abstract]  
• McCLURE, W. (1983). The Competition Strategy for Medical Care. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 468: 30-47 [Abstract]