FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 319:1251-1255 November 10, 1988 Number 19 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

To evaluate the safety and cost of outpatient cardiac catheterization, we conducted a randomized trial at three hospitals of outpatient (n = 192) as compared with inpatient (n = 189) cardiac catheterization in low-risk patients. Outpatients had the following complication rates as compared with inpatients: hematoma, 12 versus 8.5 percent; numbness or weakness of extremity, 0.5 versus 1.6 percent; cold or blue extremity, 1.6 versus 1.1 percent; and acute myocardial infarction, 1.6 versus 0.5 percent. None of these differences were statistically significant. No deaths or strokes occurred in either group. Twenty-three patients (12 percent) assigned to the outpatient group required hospitalization because of complications of catheterization. In the outpatient group, the relative risk for hematoma was 1.42 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.77 to 2.29), and the relative risk for myocardial infarction within one week was 2.95 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 28.1). There were no significant differences between the two groups in whether they resumed normal activities or in the rates of rehospitalization within one week of the procedure. Total catheterization-related charges per patient were $679 lower for outpatients, with a savings in total hospital charges (including charges for subsequent therapeutic procedures) of $885 per patient. We conclude that elective cardiac catheterization as an outpatient procedure for selected patients is feasible and safe. Given the small size of our sample, however, we urge caution in interpreting these findings, since they do not exclude a small increase in complication rates with outpatient cardiac catheterization.

Source Information

Massachusetts General Hospital, Cardiac Unit, Boston 02114.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Gronefeld, G., Ehrlich, J.R., Hohnloser, S.H. (2003). Comparison of outpatient vs inpatient direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: safety, efficacy and cost savings. Eur Heart J Suppl 5: H19-H24 [Abstract]  
• Brett, A., Grodin, M. (1991). Ethical Aspects of Human Experimentation in Health Services Research. JAMA 265: 1854-1857 [Abstract]  
• (1988). OUTPATIENT CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION. JWatch General 1988: 6-6 [Full Text]