FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 327:937-942 September 24, 1992 Number 13 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

A palpable mass in a woman's breast represents a potentially serious lesion and requires evaluation by history taking, physical examination, and mammography. The initial objective is to distinguish simple cysts from solid lesions, which can be accomplished with needle aspiration (Fig. 2). A solid lesion requires a firm diagnosis, and this usually calls for removing the lesion for histologic examination. A positive result on cytologic examination after aspiration is sufficiently accurate to justify one-stage diagnosis and treatment, with confirmation by examination of a frozen section obtained during the procedure. A negative or suspicious finding on cytologic evaluation is inconclusive, and outpatient biopsy is indicated. Perfection in diagnosis will require the removal of every solid mass. This can be expected to result in the biopsy of many benign lesions, but removal of many of them is desirable on other grounds. Although in some instances the probability of cancer may be exceedingly small, it is never zero. If biopsy is not recommended, the probability of cancer should be estimated so that the patient can decide whether the level of risk is acceptable to her.

Source Information

Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Shin, J. H., Han, B.-K., Ko, E. Y., Choe, Y. H., Nam, S.-J. (2009). Probably Benign Breast Masses Diagnosed by Sonography: Is There a Difference in the Cancer Rate According to Palpability?. Am. J. Roentgenol. 192: W187-W191 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kennedy, D. A., Lee, T., Seely, D. (2009). A Comparative Review of Thermography as a Breast Cancer Screening Technique. Integr Cancer Ther 8: 9-16 [Abstract]  
• Akhtar, S. S., Nadrah, H. M. (2005). Assessment of the quality of breast cancer care: a single institutional study from Saudi Arabia. Int J Qual Health Care 17: 301-305 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Graf, O., Helbich, T. H., Fuchsjaeger, M. H., Hopf, G., Morgun, M., Graf, C., Mallek, R., Sickles, E. A. (2004). Follow-up of Palpable Circumscribed Noncalcified Solid Breast Masses at Mammography and US: Can Biopsy Be Averted?. Radiology 233: 850-856 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shetty, M. K., Shah, Y. P., Sharman, R. S. (2003). Prospective Evaluation of the Value of Combined Mammographic and Sonographic Assessment in Patients With Palpable Abnormalities of the Breast. J Ultrasound Med 22: 263-268 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shetty, M. K., Shah, Y. P. (2002). Prospective Evaluation of the Value of Negative Sonographic and Mammographic Findings in Patients With Palpable Abnormalities of the Breast. J Ultrasound Med 21: 1211-1220 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ibrahim, A E K, Bateman, A C, Theaker, J M, Low, J L, Addis, B, Tidbury, P, Rubin, C, Briley, M, Royle, G T (2001). The role and histological classification of needle core biopsy in comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative assessment of impalpable breast lesions. J. Clin. Pathol. 54: 121-125 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Avril, N., Rose, C. A., Schelling, M., Dose, J., Kuhn, W., Bense, S., Weber, W., Ziegler, S., Graeff, H., Schwaiger, M. (2000). Breast Imaging With Positron Emission Tomography and Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose: Use and Limitations. JCO 18: 3495-3502 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rao, P. N., Levine, E., Myers, M. O., Prakash, V., Watson, J., Stolier, A., Kopicko, J. J., Kissinger, P., Raj, S. G., Raj, M. H. G. (1999). Elevation of Serum Riboflavin Carrier Protein in Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 8: 985-990 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Barton, M. B., Harris, R., Fletcher, S. W. (1999). Does This Patient Have Breast Cancer?: The Screening Clinical Breast Examination: Should It Be Done? How?. JAMA 282: 1270-1280 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lindfors, K. K., Rosenquist, C. J. (1995). The Cost-effectiveness of Mammographic Screening Strategies. JAMA 274: 881-884 [Abstract]  
• Kopans, D. B., Lindfors, K. K., Howell, L. P., Thickman, D., Parker, S., Clark, D., Logan-Young, W. W., Hoffman, N. Y., Janus, J. A., Donegan, W. L. (1993). Evaluation of a Breast Mass. NEJM 328: 810-812 [Full Text]