The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 328:1-9 January 7, 1993 Number 1
NextNext

The Diagnosis of Thoracic Aortic Dissection by Noninvasive Imaging Procedures
Christoph A. Nienaber, Yskert von Kodolitsch, Volkmar Nicolas, Volker Siglow, Angela Piepho, Carsten Brockhoff, Dietmar H. Koschyk, and Rolf P. Spielmann

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background and Methods This study was designed to assess the safety and reliability of new noninvasive imaging methods as compared with aortography in the diagnosis of dissection of the thoracic aorta. One hundred ten patients with clinically suspected aortic dissection followed a diagnostic protocol that included transthoracic and transesophageal color-flow Doppler echocardiography (TTE and TEE), contrast-enhanced x-ray computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Imaging results were compared in a blinded fashion and validated independently against intraoperative findings in 62 patients, autopsy findings in 7, and the results of contrast angiography in 64.

Results The sensitivities of MRI, TEE and x-ray CT for detecting dissection were similar, at 98.3, 97.7, and 93.8 percent, respectively; TTE had a sensitivity of only 59.3 percent (P<0.005). The specificities of both TTE (83.0 percent) and TEE (76.9 percent) were lower than those of x-ray CT (87.1 percent) and MRI (97.8 percent; P<0.05), mainly as a result of false positive findings in the ascending aorta. MRI and x-ray CT were more sensitive than TTE in detecting the formation of thrombus in the entire thoracic aorta (P<0.05), but were not superior to TEE in this regard. CT was not effective in detecting an entry site or aortic regurgitation, but MRI and TEE accurately identified both. Two patients died during or soon after CT and TEE, and three died between retrograde angiography and surgery.

Conclusions A noninvasive diagnostic strategy using MRI in all hemodynamically stable patients and TEE in patients who are too unstable to be moved should be considered the optimal approach to detecting dissection of the thoracic aorta. Comprehensive and detailed evaluation can thus be reduced to a single noninvasive diagnostic test in the investigation of suspected dissection of the thoracic aorta.


Source Information

From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II (C.A.N., Y.v.K., V.S., C.B., D.H.K.), the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (V.N.), and the Department of Thoracic Surgery (A.P.), Universitats-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, Hamburg; and the Department of Radiology, Christian-Albrechts-Universitat, Kiel (R.P.S.) -- both in Germany.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Nienaber at the Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Universitats-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-2000 Hamburg 20, Germany.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

The Diagnosis of Thoracic Aortic Dissection by Noninvasive Imaging Procedures
Hartnell G., Costello P., Goldstein S. A., Lindsay J., Vasan R., Nienaber C. A., Spielmann R. P., Cigarroa J. E., Eagle K. A., Isselbacher E. M.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1993; 328:1637-1638, Jun 3, 1993. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.