The practice of medicine has come under increasingly intensepublic examination during the past several years. Two reasonsfor this scrutiny are rapidly rising health care costs and theincreasing proportion of the population with limited accessto health care1. Health care expenditures in the United Statesexceed those in any other nation, and more than 37 million citizensare not covered by basic health insurance.
The public scrutiny has been facilitated by other developmentsin health care. First, many nonmedical groups, including economists,political scientists, and sociologists, have begun to studyhealth care from their own perspectives and . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Berwick, D., Davidoff, F., Hiatt, H., Smith, R., Mirvis, D. M, Bailey, J. E
(2001). Refining and implementing the Tavistock principles for everybody in health care Commentary: Justice in health care{---}a response to Tavistock. BMJ
323: 616-620
[Full Text]
Jos, P. H., Tompkins, M. E.
(1995). Administrative Practice and the Waning Promise of Professionalism for Public Administration. The American Review of Public Administration
25: 207-229
[Abstract]
(1994). William A. Glaser. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
19: 705-727
[Abstract]
Dresser, R. S.
(1994). Freedom of Conscience, Professional Responsibility, and Access to Abortion. J Law Med Ethics
22: 280-285
Schlafly, B., Potter, H. P., Mirvis, D. M.
(1993). Physicians' Autonomy. NEJM
329: 1048-1048
[Full Text]
Previous
