The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 328:1377-1382 May 13, 1993 Number 19
NextNext

Out-of-Hospital Transcutaneous Pacing by Emergency Medical Technicians in Patients with Asystolic Cardiac Arrest
Richard O. Cummins, Judith Reid Graves, Mary Pat Larsen, Alfred P. Hallstrom, Thomas R. Hearne, John Ciliberti, Ray M. Nicola, and Stanley Horan

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Transcutaneous cardiac pacemakers generate electrical stimuli that pace the heart through external electrodes that adhere to the chest wall. Transcutaneous pacing has been useful in some patients with bradycardia, but its efficacy in patients with asystole and full cardiac arrest has been limited, possibly because of delays in the initiation of pacing. We studied the efficacy of early transcutaneous pacing in patients with out-of-hospital asystolic cardiac arrest.

Methods For three years we provided transcutaneous pacemakers to about half the fire districts in a large emergency-medical-services system (the intervention group). In these districts, we authorized emergency medical technicians (EMTs) to begin transcutaneous pacing in patients with cardiac arrest and primary asystole or post-defibrillation asystole. Pacing was done as early as possible, before endotracheal intubation or intravenous medication. EMTs in the other fire districts (the control group) treated similar patients with basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation but without transcutaneous pacing.

Results The EMTs in the intervention group initiated transcutaneous pacing in 112 of the 278 patients with primary asystole. Of these patients, 22 (8 percent) were admitted to the hospital, and 11 (4 percent) were discharged. Among the 259 patients treated by the EMTs in the control group, 21 (8 percent) were admitted to the hospital, and 5 (2 percent) were discharged. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to the rate of hospital admission or survival. Survival after early pacing for post-defibrillation asystole was no better than survival after pacing for primary asystole.

Conclusions Transcutaneous pacing appears to offer no benefit in patients with asystolic cardiac arrest, even when it is performed as early as possible by EMTs in the field. Our data suggest that the widespread implementation of early transcutaneous pacing for out-of-hospital asystolic cardiac arrest would be ineffective.


Source Information

From the Center for Evaluation of Emergency Medical Services, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle (R.O.C., J.R.G.); the King County Emergency Medical Services Division, Seattle-King County Department of Public Health, Seattle (R.O.C., J.R.G., M.P.L., T.R.H., R.M.N., S.H.); the Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle (A.P.H.); and the Overlake Memorial Hospital, Bellevue, Wash. (J.C.). Presented in part at the 64th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, Anaheim, Calif., November 11-14, 1991.

Address reprint requests to Ms. Graves at the King County Emergency Medical Services Division, Seattle-King County Department of Public Health, 110 Prefontaine Pl. S., Suite 500, Seattle, WA 98104.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Transcutaneous Pacing in Patients with Asystolic Cardiac Arrest
Armon C., Cummins R. O.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1277, Oct 21, 1993. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.