Some of the earliest human records evidence an interest in therecognition and treatment of deafness. Even the most ancientand primitive tribes placed minerals and plant extracts in theear, with empirical or magical intent1. However, only in thepast several decades have physicians been able to treat adequatelythat most severe of ear disorders, profound sensorineural hearingloss (nerve deafness). Cochlear implants are electronic prosthesesthat partially replace the function of the cochlea, the hearingportion of the inner ear that transduces sound waves into codedelectrochemical signals. Because most nerve deafness is causedby the dysfunction . . . [Full Text of this Article]
References
Related Letters:
Cochlear Implants
Holmes M. D., Philip M. J., Schwab W. A., Pollard R. Q., Ebert D. A., Vanderbosch J., Levin F. M., Balkany T., Cohen N. L., Gantz B. J.
Extract |
Full Text
N Engl J Med 1993;
328:1786-1788, Jun 17, 1993.
Correspondence
This article has been cited by other articles:
Wooltorton, E.
(2002). Cochlear implant recipients at risk for meningitis. CMAJ
167: 670-670
[Full Text]
McKinley, A. M., Warren, S. F.
(2000). The Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants for Children With Prelingual Deafness. Journal of Early Intervention
23: 252-263
[Abstract]
TUCKER, B. P.
(1997). The ADA and Deaf Culture: Contrasting Precepts, Conflicting Results. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
549: 24-36
[Abstract]
Holmes, M. D., Philip, M. J., Schwab, W. A., Pollard, R. Q., Ebert, D. A., Vanderbosch, J., Levin, F. M., Balkany, T., Cohen, N. L., Gantz, B. J.
(1993). Cochlear Implants. NEJM
328: 1786-1788
[Full Text]