Some patients with cervical spinal cord injuries ask to die.It is generally held that a competent, informed adult has theright to forgo medical treatment, even life-sustaining therapy1.Furthermore, respect for patients' autonomy is not only a fundamentalethical principle, but is also sanctioned by law2,3. In particular,there are a number of published accounts of patients with high-levelcervical injuries who have been granted permission by the courtsto discontinue life support4,5,6,7,8. In all these cases, thepatients were beyond the acute phase of their injury when theymade their decisions.
Field, H. L.
(2008). A Patient With Acute Traumatic Quadriplegia Who Requested a DNR Order. Psychosomatics
49: 252-254
[Full Text]
Vince, T, Petros, A
(2006). Should children's autonomy be respected by telling them of their imminent death?. J. Med. Ethics
32: 21-23
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sensky, T.
(2002). Withdrawal of life sustaining treatment. BMJ
325: 175-176
[Full Text]
Fins, J. J., Bancroft, E. A., Edwards, M. J., Connor, W. E., Chin, A. E., Hedberg, K., Fleming, D. W.
(1999). Legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide in Oregon. NEJM
341: 212-213
[Full Text]
Fischer, G. S., Alpert, H. R., Stoeckle, J. D., Emanuel, L. L.
(1997). Can Goals of Care Be Used to Predict Intervention Preferences in an Advance Directive?. Arch Intern Med
157: 801-807
[Abstract]
Ditunno, J. F., Formal, C. S.
(1994). Chronic Spinal Cord Injury. NEJM
330: 550-556
[Full Text]
Ross, L. F., Johnson, D. H., Bennahum, D., Lehman, L. B., Flaherty, D. I., Conwill, D. E., Sorey, W. H., Herrin, V. E., Patterson, D. R., McCormick, T. R., Hudson, L. D.
(1993). Life Support for Patients with Cervical-Level Quadriplegia. NEJM
329: 663-664
[Full Text]