The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 1993;329(2):148.

Original Article
Volume 328:521-526 February 25, 1993 Number 8
NextNext

The Emergence of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in New York City
Thomas R. Frieden, Timothy Sterling, Ariel Pablos-Mendez, James O. Kilburn, George M. Cauthen, and Samuel W. Dooley

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text

Commentary
-Letters
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background In the past decade the incidence of tuberculosis has increased nationwide and more than doubled in New York City, where there have been recent nosocomial outbreaks of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Methods We collected information on every patient in New York City with a positive culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis during April 1991. Drug-susceptibility testing was performed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Results Of the 518 patients with positive cultures, 466 (90 percent) had isolates available for testing. Overall, 33 percent of these patients had isolates resistant to one or more antituberculosis drugs, 26 percent had isolates resistant to at least isoniazid, and 19 percent had isolates resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin. Of the 239 patients who had received antituberculosis therapy, 44 percent had isolates resistant to one or more drugs and 30 percent had isolates resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin. Among the patients who had never been treated, the proportion with resistance to one or more drugs increased from 10 percent in 1982 through 1984 to 23 percent in 1991 (P = 0.003). Patients who had never been treated and who were infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or reported injection-drug use were more likely to have resistant isolates. Among patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, those with resistant isolates were more likely to die during follow-up through January 1992 (80 percent vs. 47 percent, P = 0.02). A history of antituberculosis therapy was the strongest predictor of the presence of resistant organisms (odds ratio, 2.7; P<0.001).

Conclusions There has been a marked increase in drug-resistant tuberculosis in New York City. Previously treated patients, those infected with HIV, and injection-drug users are at increased risk for drug resistance. Measures to control and prevent drug-resistant tuberculosis are urgently needed.


Source Information

From the Division of Field Epidemiology, Epidemiology Program Office (T.R.F.), the Division of Mycotic and Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases (J.O.K.), and the Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for Prevention Services (G.M.C., S.W.D.), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta; the Division of Disease Intervention, New York City Department of Health, New York (T.R.F.); and Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York (T.S., A.P.-M.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Frieden at 125 Worth St., Box 74, New York, NY 10013.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in New York City
Gensheimer K. F., Joffe I., Israel H. L., Frieden T. R., Dooley S. W.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1993; 329:134-135, Jul 8, 1993. Correspondence

The Law and Control of Tuberculosis
Trachtenberg A. I., Oravec L., Roberson D. W., Reichman L. B., Mangura B. T., Annas G. J.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1993; 329:136-138, Jul 8, 1993. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.