The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 329:696-702 September 2, 1993 Number 10
NextNext

Effect of Laboratory Variation in the Prothrombin-Time Ratio on the Results of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy
Mark H. Eckman, Herbert J. Levine, and Stephen G. Pauker

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Patients receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy may be subject to unnecessary risks of bleeding or thromboembolism because of variability in the commercial thromboplastins used to determine prothrombin time and consequent uncertainty about the actual intensity of anticoagulation.

Methods We explored the effect of this uncertainty on the benefits and risks of anticoagulation in patients with prosthetic heart valves, using models of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications as a function of the intensity of anticoagulation, with quality-adjusted life expectancy and average variable costs used to describe outcomes.

Results Anticoagulation provides a striking benefit for patients whose treatment is conducted within the recommended range of the international normalized ratio (INR) -- i.e., 2.5 to 3.5 -- but if uncertainty about the laboratory results causes the intensity of anticoagulation to fall outside this range, the gain becomes smaller. Uncertainty about the true intensity of anticoagulation may reduce the potential gain in life expectancy, adjusted for quality of life, by more than half and may increase the ratio of costs to effectiveness to almost five times the optimal value. Variability in the intensity of anticoagulation is even greater if older recommendations advocating a higher level of anticoagulation are followed.

Conclusions Uncertainty about the sensitivities of the commercially available thromboplastins used in the United States can have important clinical and economic effects. This problem could be eliminated if clinical laboratories uniformly reported the intensity of anticoagulation as the INR, by adjusting prothrombin-time ratios for variability in thromboplastins.


Source Information

From the Divisions of Clinical Decision Making (M.H.E., S.G.P.) and Cardiology (H.J.L., S.G.P.), Department of Medicine, New England Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Eckman at the Division of Clinical Decision Making, Box 302, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St., Boston, MA 02111.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Variation in the Prothrombin-Time Ratio during Oral Anticoagulation
Carr J. M., Horowitz G., O'Reilly R. A., Kearns P. J., Schuff-Werner P., Schutz E., Gonska B.-D., Eckman M. H., Levine H. J., Pauker S. G.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1994; 330:509-510, Feb 17, 1994. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.