The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 329:1501-1502 November 11, 1993 Number 20
NextNext

Hormonal Contraception

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Baird, D. T.
To the Editor: In their review of hormonal contraception (May 27 issue), Baird and Glasier state, "After differences in sexual activity and the use of barrier methods of contraception (which have a protective effect) have been accounted for, there appears to be no increase in the risk of cervical cancer among women who take a combined oral contraceptive"1.

Most of the case-control studies of cervical cancer reviewed in a recent report by the World Health Organization found the risks to be higher among long-term users of oral contraceptives, even after adjustment for socioeconomic status, sexual behavior, and screening history2. . . [Full Text of this Article]

References




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.