|
|
|||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A series of recent books and journal articles have argued that community must be considered in deciding questions ranging from individual clinical cases of futile treatment to the allocation of resources and health care reform. Freedom and Community contributes to this discussion, but it does not address specific issues in bioethics. Instead, it develops a framework for rethinking a wider range of public-policy and ethical issues.
The thesis of this work is that individual autonomy and freedom are best understood within a naturalistic framework that gives primacy to the nurturing function of community. Ethical obligation originates neither in freedom nor
This article has been cited by other articles:
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |