The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correction to Fariza and Castellote, N Engl J Med 329(20):1505-1507 November 11, 1993.

Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 330:1320 May 5, 1994 Number 18
NextNext

Clinical Light Damage by Indirect Ophthalmoscopy

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
-Related Article
 by Fariza, E.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: The letter by Fariza and Castellote (Nov. 11 issue)1 on light damage by indirect ophthalmoscopy contains photographs illustrating an acute change in both maculas of a patient with high myopia after retinal examination. I take issue with the supposition that the macular lesions were due to light toxicity.

The lesions probably represented hemorrhage caused by small areas of choroidal neovascularization emanating from breaks in Bruch's membrane (lacquer cracks) or within areas of chorioretinal atrophy. An exudative detachment within the macula can also occur when choroidal neovascularization is present, and would be consistent with the whitish changes seen . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


Related Letters:

Clinical Light Damage by Indirect Ophthalmoscopy
Fariza E., Castellote M.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1505-1507, Nov 11, 1993. Correspondence



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.