The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 330:1524-1525 May 26, 1994 Number 21
NextNext

After Quinlan: The Dilemma of the Persistent Vegetative State

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
In 1968 an ad hoc committee of Harvard Medical School recommended that death be defined as cessation of all brain function1. Before that time, a patient was not pronounced dead until heart and lung function had ceased. One by one, the states accepted brain death as the legal definition of death -- a movement that was accelerated when the President's Commission formulated the Uniform Determination of Death Act in 19812. All 50 states and the District of Columbia now accept this standard3. It is remarkable how rapidly the concept of brain death attracted an ethical, social, and . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


Related Letters:

Withdrawing Treatment in the Persistent Vegetative State
Youngner S. J., O'Toole E., Avila D., Beltran J. E., Goldberg C. K., Angell M.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1994; 331:1382-1383, Nov 17, 1994. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.