The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 331:1-4 July 7, 1994 Number 1
NextNext

A Population-Based Study of the Risk of Recurrence of Birth Defects
Rolv Terje Lie, Allen J. Wilcox, and Rolv Skjaerven

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Certain birth defects are known to recur in families, but most estimates of the risk of recurrence have come from clinic-based studies. In this study we estimated the risk of recurrent birth defects using a population-based registry.

Methods The study was based on the records of the first and second infants delivered by 371,933 women from 1967 through 1989. The records are maintained by the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. For the 9192 women whose first infant had a birth defect, we determined the relative risk of similar and dissimilar defects in the second infant. The reference population was women whose first infant had no defect.

Results Among first infants, 2.5 percent had a birth defect. The mothers of affected first infants were 2.4 times as likely as other women to have second infants with any registered defect. This increased risk was due primarily to an increased (7.6 times higher) risk of the same defect in the second infant as in the first (95 percent confidence interval, 6.5 to 8.8) and secondarily to a slightly increased (1.5 times higher) risk of a different defect in the second infant (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 1.7). Among the women who lived in the same municipality during both pregnancies, the relative risk of having a second infant with the same defect was 11.6, as compared with 5.1 among the women who moved to another municipality after the birth of their first infant (P<0.001).

Conclusions Among women whose first infant has a birth defect, the risk of the same defect in the second infant is substantially increased and the risk of a different defect in the second infant is slightly increased. Environment plays a strong part in repeated defects.


Source Information

From the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and the Section for Medical Informatics and Statistics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway (R.T.L., R.S.); the National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (R.T.L.); and the Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, N.C. (A.J.W.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Lie at the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, M.F.H. Bldg., N-5021 Haukeland Sykehus, Bergen, Norway, or to Dr. Wilcox at the Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Risk of Recurrence of Birth Defects
Hook E. B., Hughes-Davies T.H., Lie R. T., Wilcox A. J., Skjaerven R.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1994; 331:1309-1310, Nov 10, 1994. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.