The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 331:1309-1310 November 10, 1994 Number 19
NextNext

Risk of Recurrence of Birth Defects

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Lie, R. T.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: Lie et al. (July 7 issue)1 report that if a woman's first child had a birth defect, the risk of her second child's being affected was increased, but that this excess risk in the second child was lower if the woman moved after the birth of her first child than if she stayed in the same place. They attribute this difference to environment.

There are a number of other explanations for this result. First, women who move to another municipality are likely to differ in a number of ways from those who do not move, with regard . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.