The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 332:821-822 March 23, 1995 Number 12
NextNext

Norplant

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Polaneczky, M.
To the Editor: The study by Polaneczky et al. (Nov. 3 issue)1 demonstrates clearly that the choice of the levonorgestrel implant (Norplant) by adolescent mothers for contraception is associated with higher rates of continued use and lower rates of pregnancy than the choice of oral contraceptives.1,2 This is because Norplant does not require the cooperation of the partner or the compliance of the adolescent mother.

Recent controversy, particularly about the difficult removal of these implants, threatens the viability of this safe and highly effective technique. We agree with Drs. Hatcher and Trussell2 that there is a compelling need for improved . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.