FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 332:972-975 April 6, 1995 Number 14

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text PDF Purchase this article Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

The Republican party's commitment to shrink the size of government, erase its budget deficit, and employ market forces to allocate medical resources will substantially shape this year's debate on the future federal role in health care. The Clinton administration is also caught up in an exercise to "reinvent" government. But unlike the Republicans, President Bill Clinton has come to the defense of Medicare, Social Security, and veterans' benefits, all of which are federal entitlement programs that serve the interests of influential voting blocs, such as the elderly and military veterans. These issues represent the battlefield on which the struggle over . . . [Full Text of this Article]

A Lower Priority for Health Care Reform

Medicare as a Target

Forcing the Hand of the Republicans

The Budget Process

The Committees and Key Republican Players

House and Senate Budget Committees

House Ways and Means and Senate Finance Committees

House Commerce and Senate Labor and Human Resources Committees

Changing the Federal Landscape

References

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Deckers, P. J. (2000). Health Care Reform and Undergraduate Medical Education: Implications for Surgeons. Arch Surg 135: 399-408 [Full Text]  
• Dalen, J. E. (1996). Managed Competition: Who Will Win? Who Will Lose?. Arch Intern Med 156: 2033-2035 [Abstract]  
• Dowling, P. (1995). Health Professional Shortage Areas, Health Status, and Reform. Arch Fam Med 4: 677-679 [Abstract]