The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 332:983-987 April 13, 1995 Number 15
NextNext

Induction of Abortion with Mifepristone (RU 486) and Oral or Vaginal Misoprostol
Hazem El-Refaey, M.D., Dhamnasekar Rajasekar, M.B., B.Ch., Mona Abdalla, Ph.D., Lynda Calder, and Allan Templeton, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Medical termination of pregnancy can be successfully performed with a combination of mifepristone (RU 486) and a prostaglandin analogue. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial to compare oral with vaginal administration of the prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol for first-trimester abortion in women treated initially with mifepristone.

Methods The study population consisted of 270 women seeking abortion within 63 days after the onset of amenorrhea. The dose of mifepristone was 600 mg, and the dose of misoprostol was 800 µg. The study had two primary end points: expulsion of the conceptus without the need for a surgical procedure, and abortion within four hours after the administration of misoprostol.

Results Expulsion of the conceptus without the need for a surgical procedure occurred in 95 percent of the women who received misoprostol vaginally and in 87 percent of those who received it orally (P = 0.03). The rate of continued pregnancy was 7 percent with the oral regimen and 1 percent with the vaginal regimen (P = 0.01). Ninety-three percent of the women receiving misoprostol vaginally had abortions within four hours, as compared with only 78 percent of the women receiving the drug orally (P<0.001). Vomiting and diarrhea were reported more frequently by the women who received oral misoprostol than by those who received vaginal misoprostol (P = 0.04 and P = 0.002, respectively).

Conclusions After the administration of mifepristone, vaginal administration of misoprostol is more effective and better tolerated than oral administration for the induction of first-trimester abortion.


Source Information

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (H.E.-R., D.R., L.C., A.T.) and the Health Service Research Unit (M.A.), Medical School, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Address reprint requests to Dr. El-Refaey at the Obstetric Hospital, University College Hospital, Huntly St., London WC1E 6AU, United Kingdom.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Methotrexate and Misoprostol to Terminate Early Pregnancy
Perrone J., Hoffman R. S., Yankowitz J., Niebyl J. R., Grunberg S. M., Swanson K. T., Levitt N., Hausknecht R.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1996; 334:399-400, Feb 8, 1996. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.