The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 332:351-355 February 9, 1995 Number 6
NextNext

The Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain — Bed Rest, Exercises, or Ordinary Activity?
Antti Malmivaara, M.D., Ph.D., Unto Häkkinen, M.Sc., Ph.D., Timo Aro, M.D., Ph.D., Maj-Len Heinrichs, R.N., Liisa Koskenniemi, M.D., Eeva Kuosma, M.Sc., Seppo Lappi, M.D., Raili Paloheimo, M.D., Carita Servo, M.D., Vesa Vaaranen, M.D., Ph.D., and Sven Hernberg, M.D., Ph.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Bed rest and back-extension exercises are often prescribed for patients with acute low back pain, but the effectiveness of these two competing treatments remains controversial.

Methods We conducted a controlled trial among employees of the city of Helsinki, Finland, who presented to an occupational health care center with acute, nonspecific low back pain. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: bed rest for two days (67 patients), back-mobilizing exercises (52 patients), or the continuation of ordinary activities as tolerated (the control group; 67 patients). Outcomes and costs were assessed after 3 and 12 weeks.

Results After 3 and 12 weeks, the patients in the control group had better recovery than those prescribed either bed rest or exercises. There were statistically significant differences favoring the control group in the duration of pain, pain intensity, lumbar flexion, ability to work as measured subjectively, Oswestry back-disability index, and number of days absent from work. Recovery was slowest among the patients assigned to bed rest. The overall costs of care did not differ significantly among the three groups.

Conclusions Among patients with acute low back pain, continuing ordinary activities within the limits permitted by the pain leads to more rapid recovery than either bed rest or back-mobilizing exercises.


Source Information

From the Departments of Occupational Medicine (A.M., T.A., V.V.) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (E.K., S.H.), Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; the National Research and Development Center for Welfare and Health (U.H.); and the City of Helsinki Occupational Health Care Centers (M.-L.H., L.K., S.L., R.P., C.S.) — all in Helsinki, Finland.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Malmivaara at the Department of Occupational Medicine, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 aA, FIN-00250 Helsinki, Finland.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain
Ernst E., Wilkinson M.J.B., Harding L., Malmivaara A., Aro T., Kuosma E.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1995; 332:1786-1787, Jun 29, 1995. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.