FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 333:1295-1299 November 9, 1995 Number 19

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text PDF Purchase this article Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

The Japanese health care system presents a tantalizing puzzle. On the positive side, universal health insurance has been achieved at relatively low cost and the health indexes of infant mortality and life expectancy at birth are among the best in the world. However, the system has been criticized for lack of good management, quality control, and attention to consumers.¹ In this article we will discuss the link between the positive and negative aspects of the Japanese system by describing the use of a universal fee schedule to define much of the health care system. We will then describe current efforts . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Principal Features of the Japanese System

Costs

Structure

National Fee Schedule

Private Practice versus Hospital Care

Dispensation of Drugs

Role of the Fee Schedule

Recent Attempts at Reform

Source Information

From the School of Policy Management and the Department of Hospital and Medical Administration, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan (N.I.); and the Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (J.C.C.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Ikegami at the Department of Hospital and medical Administration, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi Shinjuku, Tokyo 160, Japan.

References

Related Letters:

Survival after Age 80
Preston S. H., Elo I. T., Hughes-Davies T.H., Sallar A. M., Hogg R. S., Schechter M. T., Manton K. G., Vaupel J. C.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1996; 334:537-538, Feb 22, 1996. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Bezruchka, S., Namekata, T., Sistrom, M. G. (2008). Interplay of Politics and Law to Promote Health: Improving Economic Equality and Health: The Case of Postwar Japan. AJPH 98: 589-594 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Meltzer, D., Manning, W. G., Morrison, J., Shah, M. N., Jin, L., Guth, T., Levinson, W. (2002). Effects of Physician Experience on Costs and Outcomes on an Academic General Medicine Service: Results of a Trial of Hospitalists. ANN INTERN MED 137: 866-874 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rodwin, M. A., Okamoto, A. (2000). Physicians' Conflicts of Interest in Japan and the United States: Lessons for the United States. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 25: 343-376 [Abstract]  
• Ikegami, N. (1997). Public Long-term Care Insurance in Japan. JAMA 278: 1310-1314 [Abstract]  
• Manton, K. G., Corder, L., Stallard, E. (1997). Chronic disability trends in elderly United States populations: 1982-1994. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 2593-2598 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Miyasaka, K., Suzuki, Y., Sakai, H., Kondo, Y. (1997). Interactive Communication in High-technology Home Care: Videophones for Pediatric Ventilatory Care. Pediatrics 99: e1-e1 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Friedman, E. A. (1996). End-Stage Renal Disease Therapy: An American Success Story. JAMA 275: 1118-1122 [Abstract]  
• Preston, S. H., Elo, I. T., Hughes-Davies, T.H., Sallar, A. M., Hogg, R. S., Schechter, M. T., Manton, K. G., Vaupel, J. C. (1996). Survival after Age 80. NEJM 334: 537-538 [Full Text]