|
|
|||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About the debate over futility, not a few have commented that the debate itself is futile. We will never establish an objective, uniform definition, so we should not try. Schneiderman and Jecker do not agree with this stance. In their book they issue a clarion call to physicians to take the lead in defining medical futility as a matter of professional duty. Rejecting definitions of futility based on the patient's goals alone, on prolonging noncognitive life, or on treatment that has only a physiologic effect, the authors offer their own definition of medical futility: "any effort to provide a benefit
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |