|
|
|||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Succinctly put, Matthews's book chronicles some of the pivotal events in the evolution of the art of medicine into the science of medicine. Starting with the debates surrounding Pierre Louis's numerical method in the 1800s, we traverse a series of intellectual, sociological, and political confrontations leading up to the introduction of the modern randomized clinical trial.
The first portion of the book focuses on the resistance to the aggregation that was inherent in Louis's numerical method. Louis stressed the need for carefully observed and recorded data. He championed the use of summary statistics as a means of investigating therapeutic efficacy.
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | TERMS OF USE | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |