The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 1997;337(17):1251.

Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 334:682-687 March 14, 1996 Number 11
NextNext

Treatment of Venous Thrombosis with Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin Administered in the Hospital as Compared with Subcutaneous Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Administered at Home
Maria M.W. Koopman, M.D., Paolo Prandoni, M.D., Franco Piovella, M.D., Paul A. Ockelford, M.D., Desiderius P.M. Brandjes, M.D., Jan van der Meer, M.D., Alexander S. Gallus, M.D., Gérald Simonneau, M.D., Colin H. Chesterman, M.D., Martin H. Prins, M.D., Patrick M.M. Bossuyt, Ph.D., Hanneke de Haes, Ph.D., Angelique G.M. van den Belt, M.D., Luc Sagnard, M.D., Pascal d'Azemar, M.D., Harry R. Büller, M.D., for The Tasman Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background An intravenous course of standard (unfractionated) heparin with the dose adjusted to prolong the activated partial-thromboplastin time to a desired length is the standard initial in-hospital treatment for patients with deep-vein thrombosis, but fixed-dose subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin appears to be as effective and safe. Because the latter treatment can be given on an outpatient basis, we compared the two treatments in symptomatic outpatients with proximal-vein thrombosis but no signs of pulmonary embolism.

Methods We randomly assigned patients to adjusted-dose intravenous standard heparin administered in the hospital (198 patients) or fixed-dose subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home, when feasible (202 patients). We compared the treatments with respect to recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, quality of life, and costs.

Results Seventeen of the 198 patients who received standard heparin (8.6 percent) and 14 of the 202 patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin (6.9 percent) had recurrent thromboembolism (difference, 1.7 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, -3.6 to 6.9). Major bleeding occurred in four patients assigned to standard heparin (2.0 percent) and one patient assigned to low-molecular-weight heparin (0.5 percent; difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, -0.7 to 2.7). Quality of life improved in both groups. Physical activity and social functioning were better in the patients assigned to low-molecular-weight heparin. Among the patients in that group, 36 percent were never admitted to the hospital at all, and 40 percent were discharged early. This treatment was associated with a mean reduction in hospital days of 67 percent, ranging from 29 percent to 86 percent in the various study centers.

Conclusions In patients with proximal-vein thrombosis, treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin at home is feasible, effective, and safe.


Source Information

From the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.M.W.K., M.H.P., P.M.M.B., H.H., A.G.M.B., H.R.B.); Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam (D.P.M.B.); the Istituto di Semeiotica Medica, Padua, Italy (P.P.); Medicina Interna e Oncologica Medica, Pavia, Italy (F.P.); Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand (P.A.O.); Academic Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (J.M.); Flinders Medical Center, Adelaide, Australia (A.S.G.); Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia (C.H.C.); Hôpital Clamart, Paris (G.S.).; and Sanofi Winthrop, Paris (L.S., P.A.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Koopman at the Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Center for Hemostasis, Thrombosis, Atherosclerosis, and Inflammation Research, Rm. F4-133, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.