In late January 1996, President Bill Clinton signed a continuingresolution to keep the government open. Among other things,the resolution prohibits the use of federal funds for researchon human embryos.1 This prohibition, which continues until September30, the end of the current fiscal year, would become permanentif Congress reaffirms it and the President concurs.1 Compromiselanguage to limit the prohibition to embryos created expresslyfor research purposes, but permitting federally funded researchon "spare" embryos (those created for procreation but no longerneeded) was defeated.2 A much stronger case can be made forusing spare embryos in . . . [Full Text of this Article]
The Human Embryo Research Panel
The Moral Framework Presented by the Panel
Creating Embryos for Research
The Politics of Abortion
References
Related Letters:
The Politics of Human-Embryo Research
Green R. M., Tauer C. A., Eppig J. J., Fletcher J. C., Waldron P., Annas G. J., Caplan A., Elias S.
Extract |
Full Text
N Engl J Med 1996;
335:1243-1245, Oct 17, 1996.
Correspondence
This article has been cited by other articles:
Prainsack, B.
(2006). 'Negotiating Life': The Regulation of Human Cloning and Embryonic Stem Cell Research in Israel. Social Studies of Science
36: 173-205
[Abstract]
Annas, G. J.
(2000). Ulysses and the Fate of Frozen Embryos -- Reproduction, Research, or Destruction?. NEJM
343: 373-376
[Full Text]
Annas, G. J.
(1998). The Shadowlands -- Secrets, Lies, and Assisted Reproduction. NEJM
339: 935-939
[Full Text]
Annas, G. J.
(1998). Why We Should Ban Human Cloning. NEJM
339: 122-125
[Full Text]
Green, R. M., Tauer, C. A., Eppig, J. J., Fletcher, J. C., Waldron, P., Annas, G. J., Caplan, A., Elias, S.
(1996). The Politics of Human-Embryo Research. NEJM
335: 1243-1245
[Full Text]