FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Volume 335:689-695 September 5, 1996 Number 10 Next

	Full Text PDF Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article by Turner, M. J. PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background In an attempt to reduce the rate of cesarean section, obstetricians now offer a trial of labor to pregnant women who have had a previous cesarean section. Although a trial of labor is usually successful and is relatively safe, few studies have directly addressed the maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with this method of delivery.

Methods We performed a population-based, longitudinal study of 6138 women in Nova Scotia who had previously undergone cesarean section and had delivered a singleton live infant in the period from 1986 through 1992.

Results A total of 3249 women elected a trial of labor, and 2889 women chose to undergo a second cesarean section. There were no maternal deaths. The overall rate of maternal morbidity was 8.1 percent; 1.3 percent had major complications (a need for hysterectomy, uterine rupture, or operative injury) and 6.9 percent had minor complications (puerperal fever, a need for blood transfusion, or abdominal-wound infection). Although the overall rate of maternal complications did not differ significantly between the women who chose a trial of labor and the women who elected cesarean section (odds ratio for the trial-of-labor group, 0.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.8 to 1.1), major complications were nearly twice as likely among women undergoing a trial of labor (odds ratio, 1.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.0). Apgar scores, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, and perinatal mortality were similar among the infants whose mothers had a trial of labor and those whose mothers underwent elective cesarean section.

Conclusions Among pregnant women who have had a cesarean section, major maternal complications are almost twice as likely among those whose deliveries are managed with a trial of labor as among those who undergo an elective second cesarean section.

Source Information

From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (M.J.M., E.R.L., W.A.B.) and Epidemiology (M.J.M., A.F.O.), School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; and Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada (E.R.L.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. McMahon at the Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB 7570, 214 MacNider Bldg., Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7570.

Full Text of this Article

Related Letters:

Trial of Labor Compared with an Elective Second Cesarean Section
Turner M. J., McNally O., Gardeil F., Fruchter O., Saad A. H., Hale R. W., McMahon M. J., Luther E. R., Bowes W. A., Paul R. H.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 336:658-659, Feb 27, 1997. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Chang, J. J., Stamilio, D. M., Macones, G. A. (2008). Effect of Hospital Volume on Maternal Outcomes in Women with Prior Cesarean Delivery Undergoing Trial of Labor. Am J Epidemiol 167: 711-718 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hernandez-Diaz, S., Van Marter, L. J., Werler, M. M., Louik, C., Mitchell, A. A. (2007). Risk Factors for Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn. Pediatrics 120: e272-e282 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hoyert, D. L., Mathews, T.J., Menacker, F., Strobino, D. M., Guyer, B. (2006). Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: 2004. Pediatrics 117: 168-183 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Martin, J. A., Kochanek, K. D., Strobino, D. M., Guyer, B., MacDorman, M. F. (2005). Annual Summary of Vital Statistics--2003. Pediatrics 115: 619-634 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Landon, M. B., Hauth, J. C., Leveno, K. J., Spong, C. Y., Leindecker, S., Varner, M. W., Moawad, A. H., Caritis, S. N., Harper, M., Wapner, R. J., Sorokin, Y., Miodovnik, M., Carpenter, M., Peaceman, A. M., O'Sullivan, M. J., Sibai, B., Langer, O., Thorp, J. M., Ramin, S. M., Mercer, B. M., Gabbe, S. G., the National Institute of Child Health and Human D, (2004). Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery. NEJM 351: 2581-2589 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Guise, J.-M., McDonagh, M. S, Osterweil, P., Nygren, P., Chan, B. K S, Helfand, M. (2004). Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 329: 19- [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hannah, M. E. (2004). Planned elective cesarean section: A reasonable choice for some women?. CMAJ 170: 813-814 [Full Text]  
• Smith, G. C. S., Pell, J. P., Cameron, A. D., Dobbie, R. (2002). Risk of Perinatal Death Associated With Labor After Previous Cesarean Delivery in Uncomplicated Term Pregnancies. JAMA 287: 2684-2690 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lydon-Rochelle, M., Holt, V. L., Easterling, T. R., Martin, D. P. (2001). Risk of Uterine Rupture during Labor among Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery. NEJM 345: 3-8 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Seinera, P., Farina, C., Todros, T. (2000). Laparoscopic myomectomy and subsequent pregnancy: results in 54 patients. Hum Reprod 15: 1993-1996 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sachs, B. P., Kobelin, C., Castro, M. A., Frigoletto, F. (1999). The Risks of Lowering the Cesarean-Delivery Rate. NEJM 340: 54-57 [Full Text]  
• Paterson-Brown, S., Amu, O., Rajendran, S., Bolaji, I. I (1998). Controversies in management: Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? • Yes, as long as the woman is fully informed • Maternal choice alone should not determine method of delivery. BMJ 317: 462-465 [Full Text]  
• Greene, M. F., Roberts, D. J., Mark, E. J. (1998). Case 9-1998- Cardiovascular Collapse after Vaginal Delivery in a Patient with a History of Cesarean Section. NEJM 338: 821-826 [Full Text]  
• Turner, M. J., McNally, O., Gardeil, F., Fruchter, O., Saad, A. H., Hale, R. W., McMahon, M. J., Luther, E. R., Bowes, W. A., Paul, R. H. (1997). Trial of Labor Compared with an Elective Second Cesarean Section. NEJM 336: 658-659 [Full Text]  
• (1996). TRIAL OF LABOR VS. ANOTHER C-SECTION. JWatch General 1996: 1-1 [Full Text]  
• (1996). Trial of Labor vs. Another C-Section: How Safe Is Safe Enough?. JWatch Women's Health 1996: 3-3 [Full Text]  
• Paul, R. H. (1996). Toward Fewer Cesarean Sections -- The Role of a Trial of Labor. NEJM 335: 735-736 [Full Text]