FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 335:1035-1041 October 3, 1996 Number 14 Next

	Full Text PDF Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background We studied the effect of state legislation requiring the disclosure of options for the treatment of breast cancer on the use of breast-conserving surgery in clinical practice.

Methods The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry provided data on women from 30 through 79 years of age who underwent breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy for local or regional breast cancer from 1983 through 1990. We examined the trend over time in the use of breast-conserving surgery among patients in four sites (Connecticut, Iowa, Seattle, and Utah) where there were no state laws specifically requiring the disclosure of options for the treatment of breast cancer by physicians. For four additional sites (Detroit, Atlanta, New Mexico, and Hawaii) that had such legislation, we determined whether the rate of breast-conserving surgery after the legislation was different from the expected rate.

Results An attorney rated the legislation as giving most direction to physicians in Michigan, followed by Hawaii, Georgia, and New Mexico. The rate of breast-conserving surgery was up to 8.7 percent higher than expected in Detroit for six months after the passage of the Michigan law (P<0.01). The rate was up to 13.2 percent higher than expected in Hawaii for 12 months after that state's law was passed (P<0.05) and up to 6.0 percent higher than expected in Atlanta for 3 months after the passage of the Georgia law (P<0.01). After these transient increases, the surgery rates reverted to the expected levels. No significant effect was detected in New Mexico, where only a resolution without legal force was passed.

Conclusions Legislation requiring physicians to disclose options for the treatment of breast cancer appeared to have only a slight and transient effect on the rate of use of breast-conserving surgery.

Source Information

From the Departments of Medicine (A.B.N.), Biostatistics (R.G.H.), Bioethics (R.S.), and Family and Community Medicine (M.S.G.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and the Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (J.S.G.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Nattinger at the Division of General Internal Medicine, Administrative Offices (FMLH-East), Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53226.

Full Text of this Article

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Bradley, C. T., Brasel, K. J. (2008). Core Competencies in Palliative Care for Surgeons: Interpersonal and Communication Skills. AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 24: 499-507 [Abstract]  
• Waljee, J. F., Rogers, M. A.M., Alderman, A. K. (2007). Decision Aids and Breast Cancer: Do They Influence Choice for Surgery and Knowledge of Treatment Options?. JCO 25: 1067-1073 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Luo, R., Giordano, S. H., Freeman, J. L., Zhang, D., Goodwin, J. S. (2006). Referral to Medical Oncology: A Crucial Step in the Treatment of Older Patients with Stage III Colon Cancer. The Oncologist 11: 1025-1033 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kimmick, G., Camacho, F., Foley, K. L., Levine, E. A., Balkrishnan, R., Anderson, R. (2006). Racial Differences in Patterns of Care Among Medicaid-Enrolled Patients With Breast Cancer. J Oncol Pract 2: 205-213 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nattinger, A. B. (2005). Variation in the Choice of Breast-Conserving Surgery or Mastectomy: Patient or Physician Decision Making?. JCO 23: 5429-5431 [Full Text]  
• Dillman, R. O., Chico, S., Finestone, S., Morrow, M. (2001). Utilization of Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer. JCO 19: 4350-4351 [Full Text]  
• Morrow, M., White, J., Moughan, J., Owen, J., Pajack, T., Sylvester, J., Frank Wilson, J., Winchester, D. (2001). Factors Predicting the Use of Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Breast Carcinoma. JCO 19: 2254-2262 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cyran, E. M., Crane, L. A., Palmer, L. (2001). Physician Sex and Other Factors Associated With Type of Breast Cancer Surgery in Older Women. Arch Surg 136: 185-191 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Baile, W. F., Buckman, R., Lenzi, R., Glober, G., Beale, E. A., Kudelka, A. P. (2000). SPIKES--A Six-Step Protocol for Delivering Bad News: Application to the Patient with Cancer. The Oncologist 5: 302-311 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Butler Nattinger, A., Hoffmann, R. G., Howell-Pelz, A., Goodwin, J. S. (1998). Effect of Nancy Reagan's Mastectomy on Choice of Surgery for Breast Cancer by US Women. JAMA 279: 762-766 [Abstract] [Full Text]