The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 335:1864-1869 December 19, 1996 Number 25
NextNext

Effect on the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation of Identifying Patients Capable of Breathing Spontaneously
E. Wesley Ely, M.D., M.P.H., Albert M. Baker, M.D., Donnie P. Dunagan, M.D., Henry L. Burke, M.D., Allen C. Smith, M.D., Patrick T. Kelly, M.D., Margaret M. Johnson, M.D., Rick W. Browder, M.D., David L. Bowton, M.D., and Edward F. Haponik, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Prompt recognition of the reversal of respiratory failure may permit earlier discontinuation of mechanical ventilation, without harm to the patient.

Methods We conducted a randomized, controlled trial in 300 adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation in medical and coronary intensive care units. In the intervention group, patients underwent daily screening of respiratory function by physicians, respiratory therapists, and nurses to identify those possibly capable of breathing spontaneously; successful tests were followed by two-hour trials of spontaneous breathing in those who met the criteria. Physicians were notified when their patients successfully completed the trials of spontaneous breathing. The control subjects had daily screening but no other interventions. In both groups, all clinical decisions, including the decision to discontinue mechanical ventilation, were made by the attending physicians.

Results Although the 149 patients randomly assigned to the intervention group had more severe disease, they received mechanical ventilation for a median of 4.5 days, as compared with 6 days in the 151 patients in the control group (P = 0.003). The median interval between the time a patient met the screening criteria and the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation was one day in the intervention group and three days in the control group (P<0.001). Complications — removal of the breathing tube by the patient, reintubation, tracheostomy, and mechanical ventilation for more than 21 days — occurred in 20 percent of the intervention group and 41 percent of the control group (P = 0.001). The number of days of intensive care and hospital care was similar in the two groups. Total costs for the intensive care unit were lower in the intervention group (median, $15,740, vs. $20,890 in the controls; P = 0.03); hospital costs were lower, though not significantly so (median, $26,229 and $29,048, respectively; P = 0.3).

Conclusions Daily screening of the respiratory function of adults receiving mechanical ventilation, followed by trials of spontaneous breathing in appropriate patients and notification of their physicians when the trials were successful, can reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and the cost of intensive care and is associated with fewer complications than usual care.


Source Information

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, N.C. (E.W.E., D.P.D., H.L.B., A.C.S., P.T.K., R.W.B., D.L.B., E.F.H.); Lynchburg Pulmonary Associates, Lynchburg, Va. (A.M.B.); and the Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla. (M.M.J.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Ely at the Section on Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
Epstein S. K., Merrill W. W., Teba L., Ely E. W., Haponik E. F.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1610-1611, May 29, 1997. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.