The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 335:1933-1940 December 26, 1996 Number 26
NextNext

Improved Survival with an Implanted Defibrillator in Patients with Coronary Disease at High Risk for Ventricular Arrhythmia
Arthur J. Moss, M.D., W. Jackson Hall, Ph.D., David S. Cannom, M.D., James P. Daubert, M.D., Steven L. Higgins, M.D., Helmut Klein, M.D., Joseph H. Levine, M.D., Sanjeev Saksena, M.D., Albert L. Waldo, M.D., David Wilber, M.D., Mary W. Brown, M.S., Moonseong Heo, Ph.D., for The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Unsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with previous myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction is associated with a two-year mortality rate of about 30 percent. We studied whether prophylactic therapy with an implanted cardioverter–defibrillator, as compared with conventional medical therapy, would improve survival in this high-risk group of patients.

Methods Over the course of five years, 196 patients in New York Heart Association functional class I, II, or III with prior myocardial infarction; a left ventricular ejection fraction <0.35; a documented episode of asymptomatic unsustained ventricular tachycardia; and inducible, nonsuppressible ventricular tachyarrhythmia on electrophysiologic study were randomly assigned to receive an implanted defibrillator (n = 95) or conventional medical therapy (n = 101). We used a two-sided sequential design with death from any cause as the end point.

Results The base-line characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. During an average follow-up of 27 months, there were 15 deaths in the defibrillator group (11 from cardiac causes) and 39 deaths in the conventional-therapy group (27 from cardiac causes) (hazard ratio for overall mortality, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.26 to 0.82; P = 0.009). There was no evidence that amiodarone, beta-blockers, or any other antiarrhythmic therapy had a significant influence on the observed hazard ratio.

Conclusions In patients with a prior myocardial infarction who are at high risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmia, prophylactic therapy with an implanted defibrillator leads to improved survival as compared with conventional medical therapy.


Source Information

From the Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine (A.J.M., J.P.D.), the Department of Biostatistics (W.J.H., M.H.), and the Department of Community and Preventive Medicine (M.W.B.), University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, N.Y.; Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles (D.S.C.); Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, Calif. (S.L.H.); University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany (H.K.); St. Francis Hospital–Heart Center, Roslyn, N.Y. (J.H.L.); Eastern Heart Institute, Passaic, N.J. (S.S.); the Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland (A.L.W.); and the Cardiology Unit, University of Chicago, Chicago (D.W.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Moss at the Heart Research Follow-up Program, Box 653, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Implantable Defibrillators in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease at High Risk for Ventricular Arrhythmia
Clesham G. J., Petch M. C., Uretsky B. F., Moss A. J., Hall W. J., The MADIT Investigators
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1676-1677, Jun 5, 1997. Correspondence

Prophylactic Use of Implanted Cardiac Defibrillators in Patients at High Risk for Ventricular Arrhythmias after Coronary-Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Fruchter O., Suliman F.A.E., Bigger J. T., DiMarco J. P., Rottman J. N.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 338:1227-1228, Apr 23, 1998. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.