The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 335:1984-1985 December 26, 1996 Number 26
NextNext

Unsustained Ventricular Tachycardia — To Treat or Not to Treat

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
Physicians have long struggled with the vexing problem of how best to treat patients with myocardial infarction, reduced left ventricular function, and asymptomatic unsustained ventricular tachycardia who may be at risk for sudden death due to ventricular fibrillation. The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) was a randomized clinical trial that addressed whether such patients might benefit from an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator. In this trial patients with asymptomatic unsustained ventricular tachycardia who had inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation that remained inducible after the intravenous administration of procainamide were randomly assigned to receive implantable cardioverter–defibrillators or antiarrhythmic-drug therapy. The results . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.