The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 335:668-670 August 29, 1996 Number 9
NextNext

Olestra and the FDA

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Blackburn, H.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: As participants in the Food Advisory Committee assembled by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to consider the petition for approval of Olestra submitted by Procter & Gamble, we have a view of the approval process and recommendation of the committee that differs from that presented by Dr. Blackburn (April 11 issue).1

The review process for Olestra involved the consideration of data from more than 200 studies in animals and humans (involving tens to thousands of subjects per study) conducted over a period of 25 years under both controlled and "free-living" conditions. The studies were reviewed by . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.