The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Sounding Board
PreviousPrevious
Volume 336:954-956 March 27, 1997 Number 13
NextNext

Unlimited Human Autonomy — A Cultural Bias?

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
Autonomy has become a dominant bioethical value in the Western world. It is the basis of many ethical decisions, and considerations of autonomy influence legislators, judges, and the public alike. The predominance of autonomy has been described by one of its critics as verging on the "tyrannous."1

In this essay I describe three recent events in Israel that run counter to this trend. They include court decisions and the enactment of laws that clearly place Israel in a unique, and perhaps lonely, position in the Western world. The most recent event was a decision2 by a district judge who ordered . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.