The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 336:1108-1109 April 10, 1997 Number 15
NextNext

Mandatory Radiographs after Tube Placement

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: Thomas et al. (Oct. 24 issue)1 touch on a controversial issue when they state that "radiographic confirmation of tube placement should be mandatory before material is lavaged through nasogastric tubes." There are a great many nasogastric and feeding tubes placed, and replaced, in this country. Chest radiography, usually performed at the bedside, is relatively expensive and may not be available in some institutions.

The word "mandatory" should be used reluctantly when applied to the practice of medicine, which remains an art as well as a science. I certainly agree that radiographs should be obtained in most patients . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


Related Letters:

Accidental Pneumothorax from a Nasogastric Tube
Thomas B., Cummin D., Falcone R. E.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1325-1326, Oct 24, 1996. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.