FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Volume 336:1473-1479 May 22, 1997 Number 21 Next

	Full Text PDF Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background A growing body of evidence suggests that electromagnetic interference may occur between cardiac pacemakers and wireless hand-held (cellular) telephones, posing a potential public health problem. Electromagnetic interference may occur when the pacemaker is exposed to an electromagnetic field generated by the cellular telephone.

Methods In this multicenter, prospective, crossover study, we tested 980 patients with cardiac pacemakers with five types of telephones (one analogue and four digital) to assess the potential for interference. Telephones were tested in a test mode and were programmed to transmit at the maximal power, simulating the worst-case scenario; in addition, one telephone was tested during actual transmission to simulate actual use. Patients were electrocardiographically monitored while the telephones were tested at the ipsilateral ear and in a series of maneuvers directly over the pacemaker. Interference was classified according to the type and clinical significance of the effect.

Results The incidence of any type of interference was 20 percent in the 5533 tests, and the incidence of symptoms was 7.2 percent. The incidence of clinically significant interference was 6.6 percent. There was no clinically significant interference when the telephone was placed in the normal position over the ear. Interference that was definitely clinically significant occurred in only 1.7 percent of tests, and only when the telephone was held over the pacemaker. Interference was more frequent with dual-chamber pacemakers (25.3 percent) than with single-chamber pacemakers (6.8 percent, P < 0.001) and more frequent with pacemakers without feed-through filters (28.9 to 55.8 percent) than with those with such filters (0.4 to 0.8 percent, P = 0.01).

Conclusions Cellular telephones can interfere with the function of implanted cardiac pacemakers. However, when telephones are placed over the ear, the normal position, this interference does not pose a health risk.

Source Information

From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. (D.L.H.); New England Medical Center, Boston (P.J.W., N.A.M.E., J.L.G.); University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (D.W.R.); and Health and Environmental Sciences Group, Ltd., Washington, D.C. (R.A.S., G.L.C., G.K.F., C.M.J.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Hayes at the Mayo Clinic, Department of Cardiology, 200 First St., SW, East 16, Rochester, MN, 55905.

Full Text of this Article

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Authors/Task Force Members, , Vardas, P. E., Auricchio, A., Blanc, J.-J., Daubert, J.-C., Drexler, H., Ector, H., Gasparini, M., Linde, C., Morgado, F. B., Oto, A., Sutton, R., Trusz-Gluza, M., ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), , Vahanian, A., Camm, J., De Caterina, R., Dean, V., Dickstein, K., Funck-Brentano, C., Filippatos, G., Hellemans, I., Kristensen, S. D., McGregor, K., Sechtem, U., Silber, S., Tendera, M., Widimsky, P., Zamorano, J. L., Document Reviewers, , Priori, S. G., Blomstrom-Lundqvist, C., Brignole, M., Terradellas, J. B., Camm, J., Castellano, P., Cleland, J., Farre, J., Fromer, M., Le Heuzey, J.-Y., Lip, G. Y., Merino, J. L., Montenero, A. S., Ritter, P., Schalij, M. J., Stellbrink, C. (2007). Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in Collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace 9: 959-998 [Full Text]  
• Authors/Task Force Members, , Vardas, P. E., Auricchio, A., Blanc, J.-J., Daubert, J.-C., Drexler, H., Ector, H., Gasparini, M., Linde, C., Morgado, F. B., Oto, A., Sutton, R., Trusz-Gluza, M., ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), , Vahanian, A., Camm, J., De Caterina, R., Dean, V., Dickstein, K., Funck-Brentano, C., Filippatos, G., Hellemans, I., Kristensen, S. D., McGregor, K., Sechtem, U., Silber, S., Tendera, M., Widimsky, P., Zamorano, J. L., Document Reviewers, , Priori, S. G., Blomstrom-Lundqvist, C., Brignole, M., Terradellas, J. B., Camm, J., Castellano, P., Cleland, J., Farre, J., Fromer, M., Le Heuzey, J.-Y., Lip, G. Y., Merino, J. L., Montenero, A. S., Ritter, P., Schalij, M. J., Stellbrink, C. (2007). Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in Collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 28: 2256-2295 [Full Text]  
• McCollough, C. H., Zhang, J., Primak, A. N., Clement, W. J., Buysman, J. R. (2007). Effects of CT Irradiation on Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices. Radiology 243: 766-774 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schoenfeld, M. H. (2007). Contemporary Pacemaker and Defibrillator Device Therapy: Challenges Confronting the General Cardiologist. Circulation 115: 638-653 [Full Text]  
• Derbyshire, S. W G, Burgess, A. (2006). Use of mobile phones in hospitals.. BMJ 333: 767-768 [Full Text]  
• Malm, D., Hallberg, L. R.-M. (2006). Patients' Experiences of Daily Living with a Pacemaker: A Grounded Theory Study.. J Health Psychol 11: 787-798 [Abstract]  
• Garatti, A., Bruschi, G., Girelli, C., Vitali, E. (2006). Small intestine capsule endoscopy in magnetic suspended axial left ventricular assist device patient. ICVTS 5: 1-4 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Marchant, W. (2004). Pacemakers and defibrillators: anaesthetic implications. Br J Anaesth 93: 875-875 [Full Text]  
• Hekmat, K., Salemink, B., Lauterbach, G., Schwinger, R.H.G., Südkamp, M., Weber, H.J., Mehlhorn, U. (2004). Interference by cellular phones with permanent implanted pacemakers: an update. Europace 6: 363-369 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kolb, C., Schmieder, S., Lehmann, G.u., Zrenner, B., Karch, M. R., Plewan, A., Schmitt, C. (2003). Do airport metal detectors interfere with implantable pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillators?. J Am Coll Cardiol 41: 2054-2059 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• NIEHAUS, M., TEBBENJOHANNS, J. (2001). Electromagnetic interference in patients with implanted pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart 86: 246-248 [Full Text]  
• Santini, M. (2001). Digital cellular telephones and ICDs. Eur Heart J 22: 1251-1252 [Abstract]  
• Chiladakis, J.A, Davlouros, P, Agelopoulos, G, Manolis, A.S (2001). In-vivo testing of digital cellular telephones in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Eur Heart J 22: 1337-1342 [Abstract]  
• Goldschlager, N., Epstein, A., Friedman, P., Gang, E., Krol, R., Olshansky, B., for the North American Society of Pacing and Elect, (2001). Environmental and Drug Effects on Patients With Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillators: A Practical Guide to Patient Treatment. Arch Intern Med 161: 649-655 [Full Text]  
• Collard, C. D., Body, S. C. (2000). Anesthetic Implications for Patients With Permanent Pacemakers. SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 4: 144-151 [Abstract]  
• Santucci, P. A., Haw, J., Trohman, R. G., Pinski, S. L. (1998). Interference with an Implantable Defibrillator by an Electronic Antitheft-Surveillance Device. NEJM 339: 1371-1374 [Full Text]  
• Zuckerman, B. D., Shein, M. J., Danzi, J. T., Carlo, G. L., Hayes, D. L., Johnson, C. M., Steffens, R. A., Bernstein, A. D., Roelke, M. (1997). Cardiac Pacemakers and Cellular Telephones. NEJM 337: 1006-1008 [Full Text]  
• (1997). Do Cellular Telephones Interfere with Pacemakers?. Journal Watch Cardiology 1997: 7-7 [Full Text]  
• (1997). ARE CELLULAR PHONES DANGEROUS NEAR PACEMAKERS?. JWatch General 1997: 1-1 [Full Text]  
• Roelke, M., Bernstein, A. D. (1997). Cardiac Pacemakers and Cellular Telephones. NEJM 336: 1518-1519 [Full Text]