The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 336:1541-1547 May 29, 1997 Number 22
NextNext

Comparison of Conventional Anterior Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal-Hernia Repair
Mike S.L. Liem, M.D., Yolanda van der Graaf, M.D., Cees J. van Steensel, M.D., Roelof U. Boelhouwer, M.D., Geert-Jan Clevers, M.D., Willem S. Meijer, M.D., Laurents P.S. Stassen, M.D., Johannes P. Vente, M.D., Wibo F. Weidema, M.D., Augustinus J.P. Schrijvers, Ph.D., and Theo J.M.V. van Vroonhoven, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Inguinal hernias can be repaired by laparoscopic techniques, which have had better results than open surgery in several small studies.

Methods We performed a randomized, multicenter trial in which 487 patients with inguinal hernias were treated by extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair and 507 patients were treated by conventional anterior repair. We recorded information about postoperative recovery and complications and examined the patients for recurrences one and six weeks, six months, and one and two years after surgery.

Results Six patients in the open-surgery group but none in the laparoscopic-surgery group had wound abscesses (P = 0.03), and the patients in the laparoscopic-surgery group had a more rapid recovery (median time to the resumption of normal daily activity, 6 vs. 10 days; time to the return to work, 14 vs. 21 days; and time to the resumption of athletic activities, 24 vs. 36 days; P<0.001 for all comparisons). With a median follow-up of 607 days, 31 patients (6 percent) in the open-surgery group had recurrences, as compared with 17 patients (3 percent) in the laparoscopic-surgery group (P = 0.05). All but three of the recurrences in the latter group were within one year after surgery and were caused by surgeon-related errors. In the open-surgery group, 15 patients had recurrences during the first year, and 16 during the second year. Follow-up was complete for 97 percent of the patients.

Conclusions Patients with inguinal hernias who undergo laparoscopic repair recover more rapidly and have fewer recurrences than those who undergo open surgical repair.


Source Information

From the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht (M.S.L.L., T.J.M.V.V.); the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Utrecht, Utrecht (Y.G., A.J.P.S.); the Department of Surgery, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam (C.J.S., R.U.B., W.F.W.); the Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht (G.-J.C.); the Department of Surgery, St. Clara Hospital, Rotterdam (W.S.M.); the Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft (L.P.S.S.); and the Department of Surgery, Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden (J.P.V.) — all in the Netherlands.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Liem at the Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Utrecht, G04.228, P. O. Box 85.500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Conventional versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal-Hernia Repair
Avital S., Werbin N., Gilbert A. I., Graham M. F., Liem M. S.L., van Vroonhoven T. J.M.V.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 337:1089-1090, Oct 9, 1997. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.