FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 336:224-226 January 16, 1997 Number 3 Next

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text Purchase this article Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article by Enriquez-Sarano, M.

To the Editor: Enriquez-Sarano et al. (Aug. 1 issue)¹ observed no change in angiographic measures of coronary atherosclerosis in 601 patients with isolated nonischemic valvular regurgitation, both mitral (n = 385) and aortic (n = 216), between 1980 and 1989. They acknowledge the limitations of the study, particularly with respect to the generalization of results to the general population.

The point of interest and perhaps concern is that both patients with aortic regurgitation and those with mitral regurgitation were included in the study. The hemodynamics of coronary blood flow in these two conditions are clearly different. In aortic regurgitation large-caliber . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References

HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.