FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Volume 336:453-458 February 13, 1997 Number 7 Next

	Full Text PDF Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background Because of a belief that the use of cellular telephones while driving may cause collisions, several countries have restricted their use in motor vehicles, and others are considering such regulations. We used an epidemiologic method, the case–crossover design, to study whether using a cellular telephone while driving increases the risk of a motor vehicle collision.

Methods We studied 699 drivers who had cellular telephones and who were involved in motor vehicle collisions resulting in substantial property damage but no personal injury. Each person's cellular-telephone calls on the day of the collision and during the previous week were analyzed through the use of detailed billing records.

Results A total of 26,798 cellular-telephone calls were made during the 14-month study period. The risk of a collision when using a cellular telephone was four times higher than the risk when a cellular telephone was not being used (relative risk, 4.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 3.0 to 6.5). The relative risk was similar for drivers who differed in personal characteristics such as age and driving experience; calls close to the time of the collision were particularly hazardous (relative risk, 4.8 for calls placed within 5 minutes of the collision, as compared with 1.3 for calls placed more than 15 minutes before the collision; P<0.001); and units that allowed the hands to be free (relative risk, 5.9) offered no safety advantage over hand-held units (relative risk, 3.9; P not significant). Thirty-nine percent of the drivers called emergency services after the collision, suggesting that having a cellular telephone may have had advantages in the aftermath of an event.

Conclusions The use of cellular telephones in motor vehicles is associated with a quadrupling of the risk of a collision during the brief period of a call. Decisions about regulation of such telephones, however, need to take into account the benefits of the technology and the role of individual responsibility.

Source Information

From the Departments of Medicine (D.A.R.), Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics (R.J.T.), and Statistics (R.J.T.) and the Program in Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research (D.A.R.), University of Toronto, Toronto; and the Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, North York, Ont., Canada (D.A.R.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Redelmeier at Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, G-151, 2075 Bayview Ave., North York, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.

Full Text of this Article

Related Letters:

Cellular Telephones and Traffic Accidents
Cohen P. J., Quinlan K. P., Paltiel O., Ambrose A., Redelmeier D. A., Tibshirani R. J., Maclure M., Mittleman M. A.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 337:127-129, Jul 10, 1997. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Committee on Injury, Violence, and Poison Preventi, , Committee on Adolescence, (2006). The Teen Driver. Pediatrics 118: 2570-2581 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Katko, T. S. (2006). Road Safety Fatalities, Management, and Policy in Finland, 1970-2003. Public Works Management Policy 11: 126-138 [Abstract]  
• Smeeth, L., Donnan, P. T, Cook, D. G (2006). The use of primary care databases: case-control and case-only designs. Fam Pract 23: 597-604 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Walker, L., Williams, J., Jamrozik, K. (2006). Unsafe driving behaviour and four wheel drive vehicles: observational study. BMJ 333: 71- [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McEvoy, S. P, Stevenson, M. R, McCartt, A. T, Woodward, M., Haworth, C., Palamara, P., Cercarelli, R. (2005). Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study. BMJ 331: 428- [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Warner, L., Macaluso, M., Austin, H. D., Kleinbaum, D. K., Artz, L., Fleenor, M. E., Brill, I., Newman, D. R., Hook, E. W. III (2005). Application of the Case-Crossover Design to Reduce Unmeasured Confounding in Studies of Condom Effectiveness. Am J Epidemiol 161: 765-773 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Laflamme, L, Engstrom, K, Moller, J, Hallqvist, J (2004). Is perceived failure in school performance a trigger of physical injury? A case-crossover study of children in Stockholm County. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 407-411 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Anderson, C., Ni Mhurchu, C., Scott, D., Bennett, D., Jamrozik, K., Hankey, G. (2003). Triggers of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Role of Physical Exertion, Smoking, and Alcohol in the Australasian Cooperative Research on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Study (ACROSS). Stroke 34: 1771-1776 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pless, I B (2003). Expanding the precautionary principle. Inj. Prev. 9: 1-2 [Full Text]  
• Etienney, I, Beaugerie, L, Viboud, C, Flahault, A (2003). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as a risk factor for acute diarrhoea: a case crossover study. Gut 52: 260-263 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pless, I. B. (2002). Cell phone regulation. CMAJ 166: 14-15 [Full Text]  
• Sorock, G S, Lombardi, D A, Gabel, C L, Smith, G S, Mittleman, M A (2001). Case-crossover studies of occupational trauma: methodological caveats. Inj. Prev. 7: i38-42 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Therien, E.-J. (2001). The accidental cell phone user. CMAJ 165: 397-397 [Full Text]  
• (2001). Driven to distraction: cellular phones and traffic accidents. CMAJ 164: 1557-1557 [Full Text]  
• (2001). Les telephones cellulaires et les accidents de la circulation. CMAJ 164: 1559-1559 [Full Text]  
• Redelmeier, D. A., Tibshirani, R. J. (2001). Car phones and car crashes: some popular misconceptions. CMAJ 164: 1581-1582 [Full Text]  
• Peters, G. A., Peters, B. J. (2001). The distracted driver. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 121: 23-28 [Abstract]  
• Frumkin, H., Jacobson, A., Gansler, T., Thun, M. J. (2001). Cellular Phones and Risk of Brain Tumors. CA Cancer J Clin 51: 137-141 [Full Text]  
• Muscat, J. E., Malkin, M. G., Thompson, S., Shore, R. E., Stellman, S. D., McRee, D., Neugut, A. I., Wynder, E. L. (2000). Handheld Cellular Telephone Use and Risk of Brain Cancer. JAMA 284: 3001-3007 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• D'Alessio, S. J., Stolzenberg, L., Terry, W. C. III (1999). "Eyes on the Street": The Impact of Tennessee's Emergency Cellular Telephone Program on Alcohol-Related Fatal Crashes. Crime Delinquency 45: 453-466 [Abstract]  
• Redelmeier, D. A., Weinstein, M. C. (1999). Cost--Effectiveness of Regulations against Using a Cellular Telephone while Driving. Med Decis Making 19: 1-8 [Abstract]  
• Tsevat, J. (1999). Calling while Driving: Laws, Economics, and Commandments. Med Decis Making 19: 101-102  
• Cohen, P. J., Quinlan, K. P., Paltiel, O., Ambrose, A., Redelmeier, D. A., Tibshirani, R. J., Maclure, M., Mittleman, M. A. (1997). Cellular Telephones and Traffic Accidents. NEJM 337: 127-129 [Full Text]  
• (1997). DO CELLULAR PHONES CAUSE AUTO ACCIDENTS?. JWatch General 1997: 1-1 [Full Text]  
• Maclure, M., Mittleman, M. A. (1997). Cautions about Car Telephones and Collisions. NEJM 336: 501-502 [Full Text]