The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 337:809-815 September 18, 1997 Number 12
NextNext

A Comparison of Clozapine and Haloperidol in Hospitalized Patients with Refractory Schizophrenia
Robert Rosenheck, M.D., Joyce Cramer, B.S., Weichun Xu, Ph.D., Jonathan Thomas, M.S., William Henderson, Ph.D., Linda Frisman, Ph.D., Carol Fye, R.Ph., M.S., Dennis Charney, M.D., for The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Clozapine in Refractory Schizophrenia

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Clozapine, a relatively expensive antipsychotic drug, is widely used to treat patients with refractory schizophrenia. It has a low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects but may cause agranulocytosis. There have been no long-term assessments of its effect on symptoms, social functioning, and the use and cost of health care.

Methods We conducted a randomized, one-year, double-blind comparative study of clozapine (in 205 patients) and haloperidol (in 218 patients) at 15 Veterans Affairs medical centers. All participants had refractory schizophrenia and had been hospitalized for the disease for 30 to 364 days in the previous year. All patients received case-management and social-rehabilitation services, as clinically indicated.

Results In the clozapine group, 117 patients (57 percent) continued their assigned treatment for the entire year, as compared with 61 (28 percent) of the patients in the haloperidol group (P<0.001). As judged according to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale of Schizophrenia, patients in the clozapine group had 5.4 percent lower symptom levels than those in the haloperidol group at all follow-up evaluations (mean score, 79.1 vs. 83.6; P = 0.02). The differences on a quality-of-life scale were not significant in the intention-to-treat analysis, but they were significant among patients who did not cross over to the other treatment (P = 0.003). Over a one-year period, patients assigned to clozapine had fewer mean days of hospitalization for psychiatric reasons than patients assigned to haloperidol (143.8 vs. 168.1 days, P = 0.03) and used more outpatient services (133.6 vs. 97.9 units of service, P = 0.03). The total per capita costs to society were high — $58,151 in the clozapine group and $60,885 in the haloperidol group (P = 0.41). The per capita costs of antipsychotic drugs were $3,199 in the clozapine group and $367 in the haloperidol group (P<0.001). Patients assigned to clozapine had less tardive dyskinesia and fewer extrapyramidal side effects. Agranulocytosis developed in three patients in the clozapine group; all recovered fully.

Conclusions For patients with refractory schizophrenia and high levels of hospital use, clozapine was somewhat more effective than haloperidol and had fewer side effects and similar overall costs.


Source Information

From the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, and the Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (R.R., J.C., L.F., D.C.); the Center for Cooperative Studies in Health Services, Hines Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Hines, Ill. (W.X., J.T., W.H.); and the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, N.M. (C.F.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Rosenheck at the Northeast Program Evaluation Center (182), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Ave., West Haven, CT 06516.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Review of Living Downstream
Frumkin H., Berke J. H., Schwartz R. S.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 338:268-269, Jan 22, 1998. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.