The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 337:1089-1090 October 9, 1997 Number 15
NextNext

Conventional versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal-Hernia Repair

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Liem, M. S.L.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: The study by Liem et al. (May 29 issue)1 comparing laparoscopic surgery with conventional surgery for inguinal-hernia repair demonstrated an advantage of laparoscopic repair in terms of recurrences and recovery. However, only 3 percent of the patients in the conventional-surgery group underwent open, tension-free repairs with mesh prostheses. This type of operation has become widely used in recent years by many surgeons and has a more favorable outcome than the classic Bassini open technique or its modifications. For example, of 3480 patients with primary inguinal hernias repaired with an open, tension-free method and with the use of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.