The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Sounding Board
PreviousPrevious
Volume 338:1381-1382 May 7, 1998 Number 19
NextNext

Masked Monitoring in Clinical Trials — Blind Stupidity?

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
In randomized clinical trials of treatment, information about which subjects are receiving the new treatment and which are receiving the standard treatment is often withheld from both the researchers and the subjects. Such masking is a reasonable precaution to prevent bias. However, many trials have a special monitoring committee to decide when to stop or modify a trial, and this committee is also often asked to review masked data. Monitoring committees review interim results to make certain continued randomization does not expose one group of subjects to inferior treatment.1,2,3,4 When a significant difference emerges, enrollment is stopped or the design . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.