The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 338:101-106 January 8, 1998 Number 2
NextNext

Conflict of Interest in the Debate over Calcium-Channel Antagonists
Henry Thomas Stelfox, M.D., Grace Chua, M.D., Keith O'Rourke, M.B.A., and Allan S. Detsky, M.D., Ph.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Physicians' financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry are controversial because such relationships may pose a conflict of interest. It is unknown to what extent industry support of medical education and research influences the opinions and behavior of clinicians and researchers. The recent debate over the safety of calcium-channel antagonists provided an opportunity to examine the effect of financial conflicts of interest.

Methods We searched the English-language medical literature published from March 1995 through September 1996 for articles examining the controversy about the safety of calcium-channel antagonists. Articles were reviewed and classified as being supportive, neutral, or critical with respect to the use of calcium-channel antagonists. The authors of the articles were asked about their financial relationships with both manufacturers of calcium-channel antagonists and manufacturers of competing products (i.e., beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and nitrates). We examined the authors' published positions on the safety of calcium-channel antagonists according to their financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies.

Results Authors who supported the use of calcium-channel antagonists were significantly more likely than neutral or critical authors to have financial relationships with manufacturers of calcium-channel antagonists (96 percent, vs. 60 percent and 37 percent, respectively; P<0.001). Supportive authors were also more likely than neutral or critical authors to have financial relationships with any pharmaceutical manufacturer, irrespective of the product (100 percent, vs. 67 percent and 43 percent, respectively; P <0.001).

Conclusions Our results demonstrate a strong association between authors' published positions on the safety of calcium-channel antagonists and their financial relationships with pharmaceutical manufacturers. The medical profession needs to develop a more effective policy on conflict of interest. We support complete disclosure of relationships with pharmaceutical manufacturers for clinicians and researchers who write articles examining pharmaceutical products.


Source Information

From the Departments of Medicine (H.T.S., G.C., A.S.D.), Health Administration (K.O., A.S.D.), and Public Health Sciences (K.O.), University of Toronto; the Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital (A.S.D.); and the Department of Medicine, Toronto Hospital (A.S.D.) — all in Toronto.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Detsky at Mount Sinai Hospital, Rm. 427, 600 University Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Conflict of Interest in the Debate over Calcium-Channel Antagonists
Meltzer J. I., Opie L., Strandgaard S., Detsky A. S., Stelfox H. T.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 338:1696-1698, Jun 4, 1998. Correspondence

Conflicts of Interest and Libel Action
Leenen F. H.H., Detsky A. S.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2002; 346:1919-1920, Jun 13, 2002. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.